机器学习分类器在图像拼接检测中的性能评价

Sudeep D. Thepade, Divesh M. Bakshani, Tanvi Bhingurde, Shivaji Burghate, Shreepad Deshmankar
{"title":"机器学习分类器在图像拼接检测中的性能评价","authors":"Sudeep D. Thepade, Divesh M. Bakshani, Tanvi Bhingurde, Shivaji Burghate, Shreepad Deshmankar","doi":"10.1109/IBSSC51096.2020.9332167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Image Splicing is known as a conventional type of digital image manipulation. It is one such type of tampering; also called as image composition. A spliced (or composite) image is usually created by copying and pasting portions of the image onto the same or another image. Spliced image detection mainly deals with finding similarity present in an image and establishing a relationship between authentic image parts and pasted portions of the image. With the increasing popularity and usage of easily available image editing technologies, even for people with minimal expertise it has become much easier to edit image data. Hence splicing is becoming sophisticated day by day making it difficult to detect with naked eyes. Due to the advent of social media and other platforms these spliced images can be circulated in faster ways among users of those platforms and hence it becomes necessary to come up with methods of spliced image detection. This paper proposes use of Thepade’s Sorted BTC, various Machine Learning classifiers for splicing detection. Here TSTBTC-Nary is explored with values of n as 2, 4, 6,…16,18 attempted on some machine learning classifiers (BayesNet, NaiveBayes, Logistic, Simple Logistic, SVM, JRip, PART, J48, LMT) for various performance metrics. After validation on 3 benchmark datasets CASIA V1, Columbia and Columbia-Uncompressed, LMT classifier performs better closely followed by Simple Logistic and J48. Better image splicing capabilities are observed with TSTBTC 16-ary closely followed by 18-ary and 14-ary.","PeriodicalId":432093,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE Bombay Section Signature Conference (IBSSC)","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Appraise of Machine Learning Classifiers in Image Splicing Detection using Thepade’s Sorted Block Truncation Coding\",\"authors\":\"Sudeep D. Thepade, Divesh M. Bakshani, Tanvi Bhingurde, Shivaji Burghate, Shreepad Deshmankar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IBSSC51096.2020.9332167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Image Splicing is known as a conventional type of digital image manipulation. It is one such type of tampering; also called as image composition. A spliced (or composite) image is usually created by copying and pasting portions of the image onto the same or another image. Spliced image detection mainly deals with finding similarity present in an image and establishing a relationship between authentic image parts and pasted portions of the image. With the increasing popularity and usage of easily available image editing technologies, even for people with minimal expertise it has become much easier to edit image data. Hence splicing is becoming sophisticated day by day making it difficult to detect with naked eyes. Due to the advent of social media and other platforms these spliced images can be circulated in faster ways among users of those platforms and hence it becomes necessary to come up with methods of spliced image detection. This paper proposes use of Thepade’s Sorted BTC, various Machine Learning classifiers for splicing detection. Here TSTBTC-Nary is explored with values of n as 2, 4, 6,…16,18 attempted on some machine learning classifiers (BayesNet, NaiveBayes, Logistic, Simple Logistic, SVM, JRip, PART, J48, LMT) for various performance metrics. After validation on 3 benchmark datasets CASIA V1, Columbia and Columbia-Uncompressed, LMT classifier performs better closely followed by Simple Logistic and J48. Better image splicing capabilities are observed with TSTBTC 16-ary closely followed by 18-ary and 14-ary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":432093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE Bombay Section Signature Conference (IBSSC)\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE Bombay Section Signature Conference (IBSSC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IBSSC51096.2020.9332167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE Bombay Section Signature Conference (IBSSC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IBSSC51096.2020.9332167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

图像拼接是一种传统的数字图像处理方法。它就是这样一种篡改;也叫图像合成。拼接(或合成)图像通常是通过将图像的部分复制并粘贴到相同或另一图像上而创建的。拼接图像检测主要是寻找图像中存在的相似性,建立图像真实部分与粘贴部分之间的关系。随着容易获得的图像编辑技术的日益普及和使用,即使对于没有专业知识的人来说,编辑图像数据也变得更加容易。因此,拼接越来越复杂,很难用肉眼检测到。由于社交媒体和其他平台的出现,这些拼接图像可以更快地在这些平台的用户之间传播,因此有必要提出拼接图像检测方法。本文建议使用thepage的Sorted BTC,各种机器学习分类器进行拼接检测。在这里,TSTBTC-Nary在一些机器学习分类器(BayesNet, NaiveBayes, Logistic, Simple Logistic, SVM, JRip, PART, J48, LMT)上尝试了n为2,4,6,16,18的值,用于各种性能指标。在CASIA V1、Columbia和Columbia- uncompressed 3个基准数据集上验证后,LMT分类器性能较好,其次是Simple Logistic和J48。TSTBTC 16-ary具有较好的图像拼接能力,其次是18-ary和14-ary。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance Appraise of Machine Learning Classifiers in Image Splicing Detection using Thepade’s Sorted Block Truncation Coding
Image Splicing is known as a conventional type of digital image manipulation. It is one such type of tampering; also called as image composition. A spliced (or composite) image is usually created by copying and pasting portions of the image onto the same or another image. Spliced image detection mainly deals with finding similarity present in an image and establishing a relationship between authentic image parts and pasted portions of the image. With the increasing popularity and usage of easily available image editing technologies, even for people with minimal expertise it has become much easier to edit image data. Hence splicing is becoming sophisticated day by day making it difficult to detect with naked eyes. Due to the advent of social media and other platforms these spliced images can be circulated in faster ways among users of those platforms and hence it becomes necessary to come up with methods of spliced image detection. This paper proposes use of Thepade’s Sorted BTC, various Machine Learning classifiers for splicing detection. Here TSTBTC-Nary is explored with values of n as 2, 4, 6,…16,18 attempted on some machine learning classifiers (BayesNet, NaiveBayes, Logistic, Simple Logistic, SVM, JRip, PART, J48, LMT) for various performance metrics. After validation on 3 benchmark datasets CASIA V1, Columbia and Columbia-Uncompressed, LMT classifier performs better closely followed by Simple Logistic and J48. Better image splicing capabilities are observed with TSTBTC 16-ary closely followed by 18-ary and 14-ary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multiclass Spoken Language Identification for Indian Languages using Deep Learning Enhancement of Nighttime Image Visibility Using Wavelet Fusion of Equalized Color Channels and Luminance with Kekre’s LUV Color Space The paradigm shift towards e-Teaching: SWOT analysis from the perspective of Indian teachers Childhood Medulloblastoma Classification Using EfficientNets Unsupervised machine learning in industrial applications: a case study in iron mining
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1