团队道德氛围的测量:TECS的发展

J. May, A. Mead, J. K. Ellington
{"title":"团队道德氛围的测量:TECS的发展","authors":"J. May, A. Mead, J. K. Ellington","doi":"10.1109/ETHICS.2014.6893410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following paper explores the concept of ethical climate in undergraduate interdisciplinary project teams. Ethical climate is formed from the shared perceptions of individuals working in some organization toward the moral situations that occur. At the team level, ethical climate is the shared moral attitudes formed by individuals in a group after working together for some time. The paper introduces a new instrument for ethical climate developed for teams, the Team Ethical Climate Survey (TECS). This measure is based on the Ethical Climate Questionnaire [1], which was formulated around Kohlberg's (1981) cognitive stage theory of moral development. The authors initially proposed eight scales covering the spectrum of team ethics considerations: team interest, laws and codes, personal morality, rules and procedures, self-interest, care, shared ethics, and interdisciplinary professional ethics. These scales include supported scales from the ECQ as well as additional considerations that might be unique to multidisciplinary team decision-making. Initial findings of the TECS, including Cronbach's alpha reliability estimates for each scale are discussed. The authors used a commonly used test development tool, the content validation panel, in which subject matter experts evaluate the overlap between the test and the domain of interest. In the present study, subject matter experts (applied ethicists, engineers, and ethics researchers) evaluated relevance and wording of each test item and suggested several new questions for incorporation. Additional findings and implications for engineering faculty and professionals are provided. This paper presents the results of research to date on the ethics component of a collaborative effort involving team-based project programs at four universities funded by the National Science Foundation under a Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science (TUES) Phase 2 grant.","PeriodicalId":101738,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Science, Technology and Engineering","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Team Ethical Climate: Development of the TECS\",\"authors\":\"J. May, A. Mead, J. K. Ellington\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ETHICS.2014.6893410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The following paper explores the concept of ethical climate in undergraduate interdisciplinary project teams. Ethical climate is formed from the shared perceptions of individuals working in some organization toward the moral situations that occur. At the team level, ethical climate is the shared moral attitudes formed by individuals in a group after working together for some time. The paper introduces a new instrument for ethical climate developed for teams, the Team Ethical Climate Survey (TECS). This measure is based on the Ethical Climate Questionnaire [1], which was formulated around Kohlberg's (1981) cognitive stage theory of moral development. The authors initially proposed eight scales covering the spectrum of team ethics considerations: team interest, laws and codes, personal morality, rules and procedures, self-interest, care, shared ethics, and interdisciplinary professional ethics. These scales include supported scales from the ECQ as well as additional considerations that might be unique to multidisciplinary team decision-making. Initial findings of the TECS, including Cronbach's alpha reliability estimates for each scale are discussed. The authors used a commonly used test development tool, the content validation panel, in which subject matter experts evaluate the overlap between the test and the domain of interest. In the present study, subject matter experts (applied ethicists, engineers, and ethics researchers) evaluated relevance and wording of each test item and suggested several new questions for incorporation. Additional findings and implications for engineering faculty and professionals are provided. This paper presents the results of research to date on the ethics component of a collaborative effort involving team-based project programs at four universities funded by the National Science Foundation under a Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science (TUES) Phase 2 grant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":101738,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Science, Technology and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Science, Technology and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ETHICS.2014.6893410\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Science, Technology and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ETHICS.2014.6893410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

下面的文章探讨了本科跨学科项目团队中的伦理气候的概念。伦理氛围是由在某些组织中工作的个人对所发生的道德情况的共同看法形成的。在团队层面,道德氛围是一个团队中个人在一起工作一段时间后形成的共同的道德态度。本文介绍了为团队开发的一种新的道德气候工具——团队道德气候调查(TECS)。该测量基于道德气候问卷[1],该问卷是围绕Kohlberg(1981)的道德发展认知阶段理论制定的。作者最初提出了涵盖团队伦理考虑范围的八个量表:团队利益、法律和规范、个人道德、规则和程序、自利、关怀、共同伦理和跨学科职业道德。这些量表包括来自ECQ的支持量表,以及可能是多学科团队决策所特有的额外考虑因素。讨论了TECS的初步发现,包括每个量表的Cronbach α信度估计。作者使用了一种常用的测试开发工具,即内容验证面板,主题专家在其中评估测试和感兴趣的领域之间的重叠。在本研究中,主题专家(应用伦理学家、工程师和伦理学研究者)评估了每个测试项目的相关性和措辞,并提出了几个新问题。本文还提供了对工程学院和专业人员的其他发现和启示。本文介绍了迄今为止关于四所大学的团队合作项目的伦理部分的研究结果,这些项目由国家科学基金会在科学本科教育转型(TUES)第二阶段资助下资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measuring Team Ethical Climate: Development of the TECS
The following paper explores the concept of ethical climate in undergraduate interdisciplinary project teams. Ethical climate is formed from the shared perceptions of individuals working in some organization toward the moral situations that occur. At the team level, ethical climate is the shared moral attitudes formed by individuals in a group after working together for some time. The paper introduces a new instrument for ethical climate developed for teams, the Team Ethical Climate Survey (TECS). This measure is based on the Ethical Climate Questionnaire [1], which was formulated around Kohlberg's (1981) cognitive stage theory of moral development. The authors initially proposed eight scales covering the spectrum of team ethics considerations: team interest, laws and codes, personal morality, rules and procedures, self-interest, care, shared ethics, and interdisciplinary professional ethics. These scales include supported scales from the ECQ as well as additional considerations that might be unique to multidisciplinary team decision-making. Initial findings of the TECS, including Cronbach's alpha reliability estimates for each scale are discussed. The authors used a commonly used test development tool, the content validation panel, in which subject matter experts evaluate the overlap between the test and the domain of interest. In the present study, subject matter experts (applied ethicists, engineers, and ethics researchers) evaluated relevance and wording of each test item and suggested several new questions for incorporation. Additional findings and implications for engineering faculty and professionals are provided. This paper presents the results of research to date on the ethics component of a collaborative effort involving team-based project programs at four universities funded by the National Science Foundation under a Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science (TUES) Phase 2 grant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ethical education of an engineer with responsibility for a sustainable world Lessons learned from a year in the trenches: Teaching engineering ethics for P.E. licensure requirements Does “public” mean an engineer's nation? Introducing graduate and undergraduate students to research and professional ethics at Columbia University Towards a global Code of Ethics for engineers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1