{"title":"KOGNITIVNI STILOVI KOD STUDENATA RAZLIČITIH STUDIJSKIH ORIJENTACIJA","authors":"Anela Hasanagić, Yusra Ozcan","doi":"10.51728/issn.1840-4448.2016.14.165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cognitive style refers to a special, relatively consistent and stable manner in which one perceives the environment, interacts with it, masters learning, creates concepts, thinks and eventually makes decisions. In the current paper we use the model by Keen (1973) and Botkin (1974), according to which there are two main styles: systematic (deep approach) and intuitive style (surface approach). The study aims to examine whether and to what extent individual’s cognitive styles affect the decision making when it comes to a career choice, i.e. a field of study. Participants in the research were 153 students, from three fields of study: engineering, humanities, business and management. The Cognitive Styles Inventory by Martin L. P. (1998) was used as an instrument in the present study. The results show that the humanities students obtained statistically significantly higher score on the scale of intuitive style compared to the management and engineering students (F = 5,472, p < 0,005). Also the results indicate that there is a statistically significant but low correlation between intuitive cognitive style and academic success, operationalized as grade point avarage(r = 0,184*). No significant gender differences were found.","PeriodicalId":165050,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik radova 14","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik radova 14","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51728/issn.1840-4448.2016.14.165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
认知风格是指人们感知环境、与环境互动、掌握学习、创造概念、思考并最终做出决策的一种特殊的、相对一致的、稳定的方式。在本文中,我们使用Keen(1973)和Botkin(1974)的模型,根据该模型,有两种主要风格:系统(深层方法)和直觉风格(表面方法)。这项研究的目的是考察个人的认知风格是否以及在多大程度上影响了职业选择(即研究领域)的决策。这项研究的参与者是153名学生,他们来自工程、人文、商业和管理三个学习领域。本研究采用Martin L. P.(1998)的认知风格量表作为研究工具。结果显示,人文专业学生在直观风格量表上得分显著高于管理专业和工科专业学生(F = 5,472, p < 0.005)。结果还表明,直觉认知风格与学业成功之间存在统计学上显著但较低的相关性(r = 0,184*)。没有发现显著的性别差异。
KOGNITIVNI STILOVI KOD STUDENATA RAZLIČITIH STUDIJSKIH ORIJENTACIJA
Cognitive style refers to a special, relatively consistent and stable manner in which one perceives the environment, interacts with it, masters learning, creates concepts, thinks and eventually makes decisions. In the current paper we use the model by Keen (1973) and Botkin (1974), according to which there are two main styles: systematic (deep approach) and intuitive style (surface approach). The study aims to examine whether and to what extent individual’s cognitive styles affect the decision making when it comes to a career choice, i.e. a field of study. Participants in the research were 153 students, from three fields of study: engineering, humanities, business and management. The Cognitive Styles Inventory by Martin L. P. (1998) was used as an instrument in the present study. The results show that the humanities students obtained statistically significantly higher score on the scale of intuitive style compared to the management and engineering students (F = 5,472, p < 0,005). Also the results indicate that there is a statistically significant but low correlation between intuitive cognitive style and academic success, operationalized as grade point avarage(r = 0,184*). No significant gender differences were found.