Anela Hasanagić, Yusra Ozcan
{"title":"KOGNITIVNI STILOVI KOD STUDENATA RAZLIČITIH STUDIJSKIH ORIJENTACIJA","authors":"Anela Hasanagić, Yusra Ozcan","doi":"10.51728/issn.1840-4448.2016.14.165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cognitive style refers to a special, relatively consistent and stable manner in which one perceives the environment, interacts with it, masters learning, creates concepts, thinks and eventually makes decisions. In the current paper we use the model by Keen (1973) and Botkin (1974), according to which there are two main styles: systematic (deep approach) and intuitive style (surface approach). The study aims to examine whether and to what extent individual’s cognitive styles affect the decision making when it comes to a career choice, i.e. a field of study. Participants in the research were 153 students, from three fields of study: engineering, humanities, business and management. The Cognitive Styles Inventory by Martin L. P. (1998) was used as an instrument in the present study. The results show that the humanities students obtained statistically significantly higher score on the scale of intuitive style compared to the management and engineering students (F = 5,472, p < 0,005). Also the results indicate that there is a statistically significant but low correlation between intuitive cognitive style and academic success, operationalized as grade point avarage(r = 0,184*). No significant gender differences were found.","PeriodicalId":165050,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik radova 14","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik radova 14","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51728/issn.1840-4448.2016.14.165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认知风格是指人们感知环境、与环境互动、掌握学习、创造概念、思考并最终做出决策的一种特殊的、相对一致的、稳定的方式。在本文中,我们使用Keen(1973)和Botkin(1974)的模型,根据该模型,有两种主要风格:系统(深层方法)和直觉风格(表面方法)。这项研究的目的是考察个人的认知风格是否以及在多大程度上影响了职业选择(即研究领域)的决策。这项研究的参与者是153名学生,他们来自工程、人文、商业和管理三个学习领域。本研究采用Martin L. P.(1998)的认知风格量表作为研究工具。结果显示,人文专业学生在直观风格量表上得分显著高于管理专业和工科专业学生(F = 5,472, p < 0.005)。结果还表明,直觉认知风格与学业成功之间存在统计学上显著但较低的相关性(r = 0,184*)。没有发现显著的性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
KOGNITIVNI STILOVI KOD STUDENATA RAZLIČITIH STUDIJSKIH ORIJENTACIJA
Cognitive style refers to a special, relatively consistent and stable manner in which one perceives the environment, interacts with it, masters learning, creates concepts, thinks and eventually makes decisions. In the current paper we use the model by Keen (1973) and Botkin (1974), according to which there are two main styles: systematic (deep approach) and intuitive style (surface approach). The study aims to examine whether and to what extent individual’s cognitive styles affect the decision making when it comes to a career choice, i.e. a field of study. Participants in the research were 153 students, from three fields of study: engineering, humanities, business and management. The Cognitive Styles Inventory by Martin L. P. (1998) was used as an instrument in the present study. The results show that the humanities students obtained statistically significantly higher score on the scale of intuitive style compared to the management and engineering students (F = 5,472, p < 0,005). Also the results indicate that there is a statistically significant but low correlation between intuitive cognitive style and academic success, operationalized as grade point avarage(r = 0,184*). No significant gender differences were found.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MJESTO ŠERIJATSKOG NASLJEDNOG PRAVA KOD BOSANSKOHERCEGOVAČKIH MUSLIMANA U PROŠLOSTI I SADAŠNJOSTI ODABRANOST I VRIJEDNOST EHLI-BEJTA BOG KAO BITAK U ISLAMSKOJ FILOZOFIJI MOĆ IGRE U PODSTICANJU PSIHOLOŠKOG RAZVOJA DJECE I MLADIH PRUŽANJE PODRŠKE DJECI NAKON GUBITKA BLISKE OSOBE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1