第1卷第1期

C. Issue
{"title":"第1卷第1期","authors":"C. Issue","doi":"10.33697/ajur.2002.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper summarizes recent evidence on the trends in contingency in higher education. Contingent faculty employment, defined as the sum of full-time non-tenure track faculty employment and part-time faculty employment, increased both absolutely and relative to all faculty positions between 2002 and 2015, despite a modest downturn after 2011. The long-term growth of contingency since 2002 has primarily occurred in doctoral degree universities. The short-term decline in contingency since 2011 has primarily occurred in public associates’ degree colleges and in private for-profit colleges. This short-term decline is due to the contraction of the for-profit sector combined with a one-time drop in public associates’ degree colleges. The explanation of the long-term growth of contingency as an inevitable response to financial exigency is rejected. Contingency has increased due to the priorities of higher education administrators, not state budget cuts or other drops in revenue. *The author is grateful to Adrianna Kezar, Joe Berry, Sue Doe and Maria Maisto for their very helpful comments and conversations. ontingency has reached astonishingly high levels across higher education. Faculty members off the tenure-track teach most undergraduate classes at most colleges and universities. The tenure system and the protections it provides for academic freedom have been significantly weakened. These trends are one of the major forces C 9 : Volume 1, Issue 1 Published by Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University, 2017","PeriodicalId":406395,"journal":{"name":"HOLISTIC ECONOMICS","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Volume 1, Issue 1\",\"authors\":\"C. Issue\",\"doi\":\"10.33697/ajur.2002.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper summarizes recent evidence on the trends in contingency in higher education. Contingent faculty employment, defined as the sum of full-time non-tenure track faculty employment and part-time faculty employment, increased both absolutely and relative to all faculty positions between 2002 and 2015, despite a modest downturn after 2011. The long-term growth of contingency since 2002 has primarily occurred in doctoral degree universities. The short-term decline in contingency since 2011 has primarily occurred in public associates’ degree colleges and in private for-profit colleges. This short-term decline is due to the contraction of the for-profit sector combined with a one-time drop in public associates’ degree colleges. The explanation of the long-term growth of contingency as an inevitable response to financial exigency is rejected. Contingency has increased due to the priorities of higher education administrators, not state budget cuts or other drops in revenue. *The author is grateful to Adrianna Kezar, Joe Berry, Sue Doe and Maria Maisto for their very helpful comments and conversations. ontingency has reached astonishingly high levels across higher education. Faculty members off the tenure-track teach most undergraduate classes at most colleges and universities. The tenure system and the protections it provides for academic freedom have been significantly weakened. These trends are one of the major forces C 9 : Volume 1, Issue 1 Published by Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University, 2017\",\"PeriodicalId\":406395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HOLISTIC ECONOMICS\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HOLISTIC ECONOMICS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33697/ajur.2002.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HOLISTIC ECONOMICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33697/ajur.2002.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Volume 1, Issue 1
This paper summarizes recent evidence on the trends in contingency in higher education. Contingent faculty employment, defined as the sum of full-time non-tenure track faculty employment and part-time faculty employment, increased both absolutely and relative to all faculty positions between 2002 and 2015, despite a modest downturn after 2011. The long-term growth of contingency since 2002 has primarily occurred in doctoral degree universities. The short-term decline in contingency since 2011 has primarily occurred in public associates’ degree colleges and in private for-profit colleges. This short-term decline is due to the contraction of the for-profit sector combined with a one-time drop in public associates’ degree colleges. The explanation of the long-term growth of contingency as an inevitable response to financial exigency is rejected. Contingency has increased due to the priorities of higher education administrators, not state budget cuts or other drops in revenue. *The author is grateful to Adrianna Kezar, Joe Berry, Sue Doe and Maria Maisto for their very helpful comments and conversations. ontingency has reached astonishingly high levels across higher education. Faculty members off the tenure-track teach most undergraduate classes at most colleges and universities. The tenure system and the protections it provides for academic freedom have been significantly weakened. These trends are one of the major forces C 9 : Volume 1, Issue 1 Published by Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University, 2017
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Çevresel İnovasyon türlerinin etkileşimi The sociopolitical analysis of the common agricultural policies of the european union Danışmanlık işletmelerinin işlevleri ve aile işletmelerine katkıları Değişim çağında yeni nesil para: Kripto paraların avantaj ve dezavantajlarına yönelik inceleme Endüstri 4.0 kritik başarı faktörlerinin belirlenmesi: GOSB Teknopark firmaları üzerine uygulama
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1