{"title":"E-learning ako komunikačná situácia s potenciálom a limitmi: názory a skúsenosti vysokoškolákov","authors":"P. Rankov","doi":"10.54937/dspt.2023.23.2.45-59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Student discourse on e-learning was investigated in six separate research studies from autumn 2020 to summer 2022. Udes qualitative methods were authobiografical retrospective essay, structured interview and questionnaire with open questions. The respondents were Slovak and Czech university students. The corpus of text data was evaluated by discourse analysis. Most students find e-learning more demanding than face-to-face education in terms of concentration and fatigue. The home environment gives students distraction and the computer is a multitasking medium. E-learning does not sufficiently support interactive communication with feedback between teachers and students, but it is also not a sufficient platform for effective communication between students. Direct interpersonal communication is important for building informal student relationships that support a creative atmosphere in the student group. Most respondents prefer face-to-face education, but with the advantages of online technologies, e.g. in case of illness or for dissemination of study materials.","PeriodicalId":142093,"journal":{"name":"Disputationes Scientificae Universitatis Catholicae in Ružomberok","volume":"294 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disputationes Scientificae Universitatis Catholicae in Ružomberok","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54937/dspt.2023.23.2.45-59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从2020年秋季到2022年夏季,六项独立的研究调查了学生对电子学习的看法。定性方法主要有:作者追溯性论文法、结构化访谈法和开放性问卷法。受访者是斯洛伐克和捷克的大学生。通过语篇分析对文本数据进行评价。大多数学生发现,在注意力集中和疲劳方面,电子学习比面对面的教育要求更高。家庭环境让学生分心,而电脑是一个多任务处理的媒介。E-learning没有充分支持师生之间的互动交流和反馈,但也不是学生之间有效交流的充分平台。直接的人际交流对于建立非正式的学生关系是很重要的,这种关系支持学生群体中的创造性氛围。大多数受访者更喜欢面对面的教育,但有在线技术的优势,例如在生病或传播学习材料的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
E-learning ako komunikačná situácia s potenciálom a limitmi: názory a skúsenosti vysokoškolákov
Student discourse on e-learning was investigated in six separate research studies from autumn 2020 to summer 2022. Udes qualitative methods were authobiografical retrospective essay, structured interview and questionnaire with open questions. The respondents were Slovak and Czech university students. The corpus of text data was evaluated by discourse analysis. Most students find e-learning more demanding than face-to-face education in terms of concentration and fatigue. The home environment gives students distraction and the computer is a multitasking medium. E-learning does not sufficiently support interactive communication with feedback between teachers and students, but it is also not a sufficient platform for effective communication between students. Direct interpersonal communication is important for building informal student relationships that support a creative atmosphere in the student group. Most respondents prefer face-to-face education, but with the advantages of online technologies, e.g. in case of illness or for dissemination of study materials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Využívanie online priestoru v rámci sociálneho poradenstva, supervízie a psychoterapie Expresívne a emocionálne výrazy v literárnokritických recenziách prezentované v literárnych periodikách a mienkotvorných časopisoch (so zreteľom na rok 2021) Koncept STEM vo vzdelávaní žiakov so špeciálnymi potrebami Filozofické predpoklady edukačných vied Artefakt – od procesu k recepcii
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1