算法作曲比较

Panida Wiriyachaiporn, Kankawee Chanasit, A. Suchato, P. Punyabukkana, E. Chuangsuwanich
{"title":"算法作曲比较","authors":"Panida Wiriyachaiporn, Kankawee Chanasit, A. Suchato, P. Punyabukkana, E. Chuangsuwanich","doi":"10.1109/JCSSE.2018.8457397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the application of Machine Learning (ML) algorithm as an algorithmic music composer, compared to a rule-based algorithm. The ML model is based on LSTMs which takes in previous notes and predicts the next set of notes based on a midi format. For the rule-based method, we apply chord progression rules and binary rhythm pattern theory. We used both algorithms to generate music in two different genres, namely rock, and jazz. To evaluate the effectiveness of the algorithms, fifteen raters are asked to identify the genre of the generated songs. The results showed 77.33% of the rulebased algorithms Jazz songs were correctly identified, compared to the 62.67% generated by the LSTM. For the rock genre, only 49.33% percent of rule-based algorithms songs and 44% Machine Learning algorithms songs were correctly identified. In terms of music satisfaction, the rule-based algorithm on average obtains higher scores in both genres, 2.17 for Jazz and 2.42 for Rock while Machine Learning algorithm receives 1.83 for Jazz songs and 1.57 for Rock.","PeriodicalId":338973,"journal":{"name":"2018 15th International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (JCSSE)","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Algorithmic Music Composition Comparison\",\"authors\":\"Panida Wiriyachaiporn, Kankawee Chanasit, A. Suchato, P. Punyabukkana, E. Chuangsuwanich\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/JCSSE.2018.8457397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents the application of Machine Learning (ML) algorithm as an algorithmic music composer, compared to a rule-based algorithm. The ML model is based on LSTMs which takes in previous notes and predicts the next set of notes based on a midi format. For the rule-based method, we apply chord progression rules and binary rhythm pattern theory. We used both algorithms to generate music in two different genres, namely rock, and jazz. To evaluate the effectiveness of the algorithms, fifteen raters are asked to identify the genre of the generated songs. The results showed 77.33% of the rulebased algorithms Jazz songs were correctly identified, compared to the 62.67% generated by the LSTM. For the rock genre, only 49.33% percent of rule-based algorithms songs and 44% Machine Learning algorithms songs were correctly identified. In terms of music satisfaction, the rule-based algorithm on average obtains higher scores in both genres, 2.17 for Jazz and 2.42 for Rock while Machine Learning algorithm receives 1.83 for Jazz songs and 1.57 for Rock.\",\"PeriodicalId\":338973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 15th International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (JCSSE)\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 15th International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (JCSSE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/JCSSE.2018.8457397\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 15th International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (JCSSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/JCSSE.2018.8457397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本文介绍了机器学习(ML)算法作为算法音乐作曲家的应用,并与基于规则的算法进行了比较。ML模型基于lstm, lstm接收之前的音符,并根据midi格式预测下一组音符。对于基于规则的方法,我们采用和弦进行规则和二元节奏模式理论。我们使用这两种算法来生成两种不同类型的音乐,即摇滚和爵士。为了评估算法的有效性,15名评分者被要求识别生成的歌曲的类型。结果表明,77.33%的基于规则的算法正确识别了爵士歌曲,而LSTM算法的识别率为62.67%。对于摇滚类型,只有49.33%的基于规则的算法歌曲和44%的机器学习算法歌曲被正确识别。在音乐满意度方面,基于规则的算法在两种类型的平均得分都较高,爵士乐为2.17分,摇滚为2.42分,而机器学习算法在爵士乐和摇滚方面的得分分别为1.83分和1.57分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Algorithmic Music Composition Comparison
This paper presents the application of Machine Learning (ML) algorithm as an algorithmic music composer, compared to a rule-based algorithm. The ML model is based on LSTMs which takes in previous notes and predicts the next set of notes based on a midi format. For the rule-based method, we apply chord progression rules and binary rhythm pattern theory. We used both algorithms to generate music in two different genres, namely rock, and jazz. To evaluate the effectiveness of the algorithms, fifteen raters are asked to identify the genre of the generated songs. The results showed 77.33% of the rulebased algorithms Jazz songs were correctly identified, compared to the 62.67% generated by the LSTM. For the rock genre, only 49.33% percent of rule-based algorithms songs and 44% Machine Learning algorithms songs were correctly identified. In terms of music satisfaction, the rule-based algorithm on average obtains higher scores in both genres, 2.17 for Jazz and 2.42 for Rock while Machine Learning algorithm receives 1.83 for Jazz songs and 1.57 for Rock.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Android Forensic and Security Assessment for Hospital and Stock-and-Trade Applications in Thailand Traffic State Prediction Using Convolutional Neural Network Development of Low-Cost in-the-Ear EEG Prototype JCSSE 2018 Title Page JCSSE 2018 Session Chairs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1