控制论和促进批判性思维的先驱——一种改变学校的方式

Teodora Surubaru, D. Isoc
{"title":"控制论和促进批判性思维的先驱——一种改变学校的方式","authors":"Teodora Surubaru, D. Isoc","doi":"10.33965/celda2019_201911l002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The requirement to assure the teaching of critical thinking put the school in front of its own weaknesses. A profound criticism highlights limitations, hindrances and obstacles that are difficult to pass without the personal efforts of the teachers. Following criticism, one can identify a set of requirements that would allow for improvement and upgrading. This set of requirements builds the specification of a cybernetic system developed to help the training process promoting the critical thinking. The new cybernetic system diminishes the role of the teacher as coordinator in approaching the field of interest, inclusively the building of the recommended bibliographic list and interventions in crises. The main stages of the training sessions coordinated by the cybernetic system aim at a) building a set of problems by the students; b) the classification of all proposed problems according to their opportunity established by the voting group; c) solving the proposed problems by the students; d) evaluating, by vote, all the solutions offered for the proposed problems. Using the formulated specification and the established operating algorithm the operating scheme of the cybernetic system is being built. The proposed scheme is intended to monitor and manage the training process. The results interpretation highlights the absolute novelty of such a system and analyzes how it satisfies the original specification. One observes the generality of the concept, the way it meets the requirement of promoting critical thinking, the fact that the promotion is made gradually and continuously.","PeriodicalId":385382,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2019)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CYBERNETICS AND PRECURSORS OF PROMOTING CRITICAL THINKING - A WAY TO CHANGE THE SCHOOL\",\"authors\":\"Teodora Surubaru, D. Isoc\",\"doi\":\"10.33965/celda2019_201911l002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The requirement to assure the teaching of critical thinking put the school in front of its own weaknesses. A profound criticism highlights limitations, hindrances and obstacles that are difficult to pass without the personal efforts of the teachers. Following criticism, one can identify a set of requirements that would allow for improvement and upgrading. This set of requirements builds the specification of a cybernetic system developed to help the training process promoting the critical thinking. The new cybernetic system diminishes the role of the teacher as coordinator in approaching the field of interest, inclusively the building of the recommended bibliographic list and interventions in crises. The main stages of the training sessions coordinated by the cybernetic system aim at a) building a set of problems by the students; b) the classification of all proposed problems according to their opportunity established by the voting group; c) solving the proposed problems by the students; d) evaluating, by vote, all the solutions offered for the proposed problems. Using the formulated specification and the established operating algorithm the operating scheme of the cybernetic system is being built. The proposed scheme is intended to monitor and manage the training process. The results interpretation highlights the absolute novelty of such a system and analyzes how it satisfies the original specification. One observes the generality of the concept, the way it meets the requirement of promoting critical thinking, the fact that the promotion is made gradually and continuously.\",\"PeriodicalId\":385382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2019)\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2019)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33965/celda2019_201911l002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33965/celda2019_201911l002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确保批判性思维教学的要求使学校面对自己的弱点。深刻的批评强调了没有教师个人努力就难以克服的限制、障碍和障碍。在批评之后,可以确定一组允许改进和升级的需求。这组需求建立了一个控制论系统的规范,该系统的开发有助于促进批判性思维的培训过程。新的控制论系统减少了教师作为接近感兴趣领域的协调员的作用,包括建立推荐书目列表和危机中的干预措施。由控制论系统协调的训练课程的主要阶段旨在a)由学生建立一套问题;B)根据投票小组确定的机会对所有提出的问题进行分类;C)解决学生提出的问题;D)通过投票来评估所有针对所提出问题的解决方案。根据制定的规范和建立的运行算法,建立了控制系统的运行方案。拟议的计划旨在监测和管理培训过程。结果解释强调了这种系统的绝对新颖性,并分析了它如何满足原始规范。人们观察到这个概念的普遍性,它如何满足促进批判性思维的要求,以及这种促进是逐步和持续进行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CYBERNETICS AND PRECURSORS OF PROMOTING CRITICAL THINKING - A WAY TO CHANGE THE SCHOOL
The requirement to assure the teaching of critical thinking put the school in front of its own weaknesses. A profound criticism highlights limitations, hindrances and obstacles that are difficult to pass without the personal efforts of the teachers. Following criticism, one can identify a set of requirements that would allow for improvement and upgrading. This set of requirements builds the specification of a cybernetic system developed to help the training process promoting the critical thinking. The new cybernetic system diminishes the role of the teacher as coordinator in approaching the field of interest, inclusively the building of the recommended bibliographic list and interventions in crises. The main stages of the training sessions coordinated by the cybernetic system aim at a) building a set of problems by the students; b) the classification of all proposed problems according to their opportunity established by the voting group; c) solving the proposed problems by the students; d) evaluating, by vote, all the solutions offered for the proposed problems. Using the formulated specification and the established operating algorithm the operating scheme of the cybernetic system is being built. The proposed scheme is intended to monitor and manage the training process. The results interpretation highlights the absolute novelty of such a system and analyzes how it satisfies the original specification. One observes the generality of the concept, the way it meets the requirement of promoting critical thinking, the fact that the promotion is made gradually and continuously.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
DESIGN OF WEB BASED DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT SYSTEM FOR SOLVING TWO SIGMA PROBLEM BECOMING STORYTELLERS: IMPROVING ESL STUDENTS' ACADEMIC ENGAGEMENT AND 21ST CENTURY SKILLS THROUGH INTERACTIVE DIGITAL STORYTELLING LIFELONG SELF-DIRECTED LEARNING IN THE DIGITAL AGE: AN ORIENTATION OF CURRENT SOFTWARE TOOLS SUPPORTING EXPERTS IN MAINTAINING AND UPDATING THEIR KNOWLEDGE AUTOMATIC ASSESSMENT TO ENHANCE ONLINE DICTIONARIES CONSULTATION SKILLS EMBEDDING VIRTUAL REALITY INTO COMPETENCE RECOGNITION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1