{"title":"罗伊去世后,宪法对我意味着什么:在Anzaldúan Nepantla看到有希望的团结","authors":"L. Stevenson","doi":"10.1353/tt.2023.a901203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the last two years, I have been conducting research that positions Heidi Schreck’s predominantly one-woman play, What the Constitution Means to Me (2019, dir. Oliver Butler), which she both wrote and starred in, within a canon of feminist storytelling and scholarship. On June 24, 2022, one day before I shared my findings at the international feminist media studies conference “Console-ing Passions,” the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) issued its decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. With its overturning of Roe v. Wade, I found myself, like Schreck, having to add devastating corrections to an already tragic script. Unlike me, though, Schreck anticipated the ever-changing present, noting in the play’s stage directions that certain data in the script “are based on published statistics from the National Sexual Violence Resource Center in the year 2019. They should be updated in performance to reflect the current reality” (38).","PeriodicalId":209215,"journal":{"name":"Theatre Topics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What the Constitution Means to Me Now That Roe Is Dead: Seeing Hopeful Solidarity in the Anzaldúan Nepantla\",\"authors\":\"L. Stevenson\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/tt.2023.a901203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For the last two years, I have been conducting research that positions Heidi Schreck’s predominantly one-woman play, What the Constitution Means to Me (2019, dir. Oliver Butler), which she both wrote and starred in, within a canon of feminist storytelling and scholarship. On June 24, 2022, one day before I shared my findings at the international feminist media studies conference “Console-ing Passions,” the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) issued its decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. With its overturning of Roe v. Wade, I found myself, like Schreck, having to add devastating corrections to an already tragic script. Unlike me, though, Schreck anticipated the ever-changing present, noting in the play’s stage directions that certain data in the script “are based on published statistics from the National Sexual Violence Resource Center in the year 2019. They should be updated in performance to reflect the current reality” (38).\",\"PeriodicalId\":209215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theatre Topics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theatre Topics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/tt.2023.a901203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theatre Topics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tt.2023.a901203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在过去的两年里,我一直在进行一项研究,将海蒂·施雷克(Heidi Schreck)的独角戏《宪法对我意味着什么》(What the Constitution to Me, 2019年,导演)定位为《奥利弗·巴特勒》(Oliver Butler),她自己编剧并主演了这部电影,堪称女权主义叙事和学术的典范。2022年6月24日,就在我在国际女权主义媒体研究会议“抚慰激情”上分享我的发现的前一天,美国最高法院(SCOTUS)发布了多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案的判决。随着罗伊诉韦德案(Roe v. Wade)的判决被推翻,我发现自己和施莱克一样,不得不在本已悲惨的剧本上添加毁灭性的修正。不过,与我不同的是,施雷克预测到了不断变化的现实,他在剧本的舞台指示中指出,剧本中的某些数据“是基于2019年国家性暴力资源中心(National Sexual Violence Resource Center)公布的统计数据”。它们的执行情况应加以更新,以反映当前的现实”(38)。
What the Constitution Means to Me Now That Roe Is Dead: Seeing Hopeful Solidarity in the Anzaldúan Nepantla
For the last two years, I have been conducting research that positions Heidi Schreck’s predominantly one-woman play, What the Constitution Means to Me (2019, dir. Oliver Butler), which she both wrote and starred in, within a canon of feminist storytelling and scholarship. On June 24, 2022, one day before I shared my findings at the international feminist media studies conference “Console-ing Passions,” the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) issued its decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. With its overturning of Roe v. Wade, I found myself, like Schreck, having to add devastating corrections to an already tragic script. Unlike me, though, Schreck anticipated the ever-changing present, noting in the play’s stage directions that certain data in the script “are based on published statistics from the National Sexual Violence Resource Center in the year 2019. They should be updated in performance to reflect the current reality” (38).