改善COVID-19后医疗保健诊所的患者流程:数据验证和探索性分析方法

Aditi Jain, Aram Bahrini, Eric Nour, Harshal Patel, Emily Riggleman, Tyson Wittmann, Karen Measells, Kimberly Dowdell, Sara Riggs, R. Riggs
{"title":"改善COVID-19后医疗保健诊所的患者流程:数据验证和探索性分析方法","authors":"Aditi Jain, Aram Bahrini, Eric Nour, Harshal Patel, Emily Riggleman, Tyson Wittmann, Karen Measells, Kimberly Dowdell, Sara Riggs, R. Riggs","doi":"10.1109/SIEDS58326.2023.10137848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare clinics have faced increased inefficiencies due to an influx of patients returning to clinical care. The strain on nursing resources leads to long patient waiting times, which can lead to provider burnout and more stressful patient care. Here we compare the electronic medical record (EMR) timestamp data with observational data to understand better the current patient flow at the University Physicians of Charlottesville (UPC) clinic, a primary care clinic within the UVA Health System. Our overarching goal for this study is to propose data-driven solutions to improve clinic efficiency and reduce stress for providers, nurses, and staff. We implemented a two-phased analysis approach. The first phase involved cross-checking the EMR timestamp data with observed data to validate the consistency and reliability of the EMR timestamp data and thus allow us to confidently identify areas of improvement within the clinic, such as peak waiting periods. In the second phase, we used the validated data to analyze the distribution of delays during different appointment stages. Using a discrete event simulation, we recommend solutions that could improve the patient experience and reduce stress on medical personnel. The findings are further supported by graphical analyses of the delays in patient rooming depending on the time of day, length of the appointment, and provider. Overall, the two-phased approach will provide the clinic with a holistic understanding of the causes behind delays in patient care.","PeriodicalId":267464,"journal":{"name":"2023 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Patient Flow in a Healthcare Clinic Post COVID-19: A Data Validation and Exploratory Analysis Approach\",\"authors\":\"Aditi Jain, Aram Bahrini, Eric Nour, Harshal Patel, Emily Riggleman, Tyson Wittmann, Karen Measells, Kimberly Dowdell, Sara Riggs, R. Riggs\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SIEDS58326.2023.10137848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare clinics have faced increased inefficiencies due to an influx of patients returning to clinical care. The strain on nursing resources leads to long patient waiting times, which can lead to provider burnout and more stressful patient care. Here we compare the electronic medical record (EMR) timestamp data with observational data to understand better the current patient flow at the University Physicians of Charlottesville (UPC) clinic, a primary care clinic within the UVA Health System. Our overarching goal for this study is to propose data-driven solutions to improve clinic efficiency and reduce stress for providers, nurses, and staff. We implemented a two-phased analysis approach. The first phase involved cross-checking the EMR timestamp data with observed data to validate the consistency and reliability of the EMR timestamp data and thus allow us to confidently identify areas of improvement within the clinic, such as peak waiting periods. In the second phase, we used the validated data to analyze the distribution of delays during different appointment stages. Using a discrete event simulation, we recommend solutions that could improve the patient experience and reduce stress on medical personnel. The findings are further supported by graphical analyses of the delays in patient rooming depending on the time of day, length of the appointment, and provider. Overall, the two-phased approach will provide the clinic with a holistic understanding of the causes behind delays in patient care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":267464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS58326.2023.10137848\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS58326.2023.10137848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自2019冠状病毒病大流行开始以来,由于大量患者返回临床护理,医疗保健诊所面临的效率低下问题日益严重。护理资源的紧张导致患者等待时间过长,这可能导致提供者倦怠和更大的患者护理压力。在这里,我们将电子病历(EMR)时间戳数据与观察数据进行比较,以更好地了解夏洛茨维尔大学内科医生(UPC)诊所(UVA卫生系统内的初级保健诊所)当前的患者流量。我们这项研究的首要目标是提出数据驱动的解决方案,以提高诊所效率,减轻提供者、护士和工作人员的压力。我们实现了一个两阶段的分析方法。第一阶段涉及将EMR时间戳数据与观察到的数据进行交叉检查,以验证EMR时间戳数据的一致性和可靠性,从而使我们能够自信地确定诊所内需要改进的领域,例如高峰等待期。在第二阶段,我们使用验证的数据来分析不同预约阶段的延迟分布。通过离散事件模拟,我们推荐可以改善患者体验并减轻医务人员压力的解决方案。研究结果进一步支持图形分析的延迟病人的房间取决于一天的时间,预约的长度,和提供者。总的来说,两阶段的方法将为诊所提供一个全面的了解病人护理延误背后的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improving Patient Flow in a Healthcare Clinic Post COVID-19: A Data Validation and Exploratory Analysis Approach
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare clinics have faced increased inefficiencies due to an influx of patients returning to clinical care. The strain on nursing resources leads to long patient waiting times, which can lead to provider burnout and more stressful patient care. Here we compare the electronic medical record (EMR) timestamp data with observational data to understand better the current patient flow at the University Physicians of Charlottesville (UPC) clinic, a primary care clinic within the UVA Health System. Our overarching goal for this study is to propose data-driven solutions to improve clinic efficiency and reduce stress for providers, nurses, and staff. We implemented a two-phased analysis approach. The first phase involved cross-checking the EMR timestamp data with observed data to validate the consistency and reliability of the EMR timestamp data and thus allow us to confidently identify areas of improvement within the clinic, such as peak waiting periods. In the second phase, we used the validated data to analyze the distribution of delays during different appointment stages. Using a discrete event simulation, we recommend solutions that could improve the patient experience and reduce stress on medical personnel. The findings are further supported by graphical analyses of the delays in patient rooming depending on the time of day, length of the appointment, and provider. Overall, the two-phased approach will provide the clinic with a holistic understanding of the causes behind delays in patient care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Car Wash Deterrent System Solar-Powered Refrigerator on Wheels: An Engineering Design Challenge Adapting Hydropower Operations to Support Renewable Energy Transitions and Freshwater Sustainability in the Columbia River Basin Methods for the Spatial Analysis of Invasive Species and Ecosystem Fragmentation at Conservation Sites in Malta Using Drones * Investigating the Stability of Organic Materials for Commercial Dyeing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1