家禽生产中的抗生素使用;在斯里兰卡选定的一个地区进行的横断面研究

H. A. Ubeysekara, N. Ranaweera, H. H. Peris, W. Wijayaratne
{"title":"家禽生产中的抗生素使用;在斯里兰卡选定的一个地区进行的横断面研究","authors":"H. A. Ubeysekara, N. Ranaweera, H. H. Peris, W. Wijayaratne","doi":"10.4038/gmj.v26i2.8050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Rampant use of antibiotics in animal husbandry contributes significantly to the development and spread of antibiotic resistance. This study determines the antibiotic activity in poultry feed and assesses the knowledge on feeding practices and their potential effects on antimicrobial resistance among poultry farm owners. Methods: Poultry feed available for sale in shops and ready to serve poultry feed and water samples from selected farms in Kegalle District, Sri Lanka were tested for the antibiotic activity using the agar well diffusion method against three control organisms; Staphylococcus aureus ATCC25923, Escherichia coli ATCC25922 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC27853 and the zone of inhibition around each well was measured. All farm owners were interviewed and basic details regarding the farm such as area, number of animals, water source and the awareness of farm owners regarding antibiotic use in poultry feeds and water source were obtained. Results: No antibiotic activity was detected in commercially available poultry feed in selected shops (5/5) and ready to serve poultry feed in selected farms (18/18). An antibacterial effect was detected in water samples collected from 33.33% (6/18) of farms. Seventy-eight percent (14/18) of farm owners declared that they administer different types of additives containing antibiotics along with drinking water served to animals. Forty-four percent of farm owners believe that usage of antibiotics in poultry is not a good practice and harmful for human health while a similar percentage claim that it is a favorable practice as it benefits them economically. None of the farm owners were aware that the use of antibiotics in poultry can contribute to the increasing antibiotic resistance in the community. Conclusion: Commercially available poultry feeds in shops and ready to serve poultry feeds in farms did not demonstrate any antibiotic activity. However, antibiotic activity was detected in drinking water served to animals due to incorporation of antibiotic containing additives beyond the prevailing guidelines. The awareness of farm owners on antibiotic use in poultry and its effects on the increase of antibiotic resistance in the community is unsatisfactory.","PeriodicalId":194530,"journal":{"name":"Galle Medical Journal","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibiotic use in poultry production; a cross-sectional study in a selected district in Sri Lanka\",\"authors\":\"H. A. Ubeysekara, N. Ranaweera, H. H. Peris, W. Wijayaratne\",\"doi\":\"10.4038/gmj.v26i2.8050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Rampant use of antibiotics in animal husbandry contributes significantly to the development and spread of antibiotic resistance. This study determines the antibiotic activity in poultry feed and assesses the knowledge on feeding practices and their potential effects on antimicrobial resistance among poultry farm owners. Methods: Poultry feed available for sale in shops and ready to serve poultry feed and water samples from selected farms in Kegalle District, Sri Lanka were tested for the antibiotic activity using the agar well diffusion method against three control organisms; Staphylococcus aureus ATCC25923, Escherichia coli ATCC25922 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC27853 and the zone of inhibition around each well was measured. All farm owners were interviewed and basic details regarding the farm such as area, number of animals, water source and the awareness of farm owners regarding antibiotic use in poultry feeds and water source were obtained. Results: No antibiotic activity was detected in commercially available poultry feed in selected shops (5/5) and ready to serve poultry feed in selected farms (18/18). An antibacterial effect was detected in water samples collected from 33.33% (6/18) of farms. Seventy-eight percent (14/18) of farm owners declared that they administer different types of additives containing antibiotics along with drinking water served to animals. Forty-four percent of farm owners believe that usage of antibiotics in poultry is not a good practice and harmful for human health while a similar percentage claim that it is a favorable practice as it benefits them economically. None of the farm owners were aware that the use of antibiotics in poultry can contribute to the increasing antibiotic resistance in the community. Conclusion: Commercially available poultry feeds in shops and ready to serve poultry feeds in farms did not demonstrate any antibiotic activity. However, antibiotic activity was detected in drinking water served to animals due to incorporation of antibiotic containing additives beyond the prevailing guidelines. The awareness of farm owners on antibiotic use in poultry and its effects on the increase of antibiotic resistance in the community is unsatisfactory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":194530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Galle Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Galle Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4038/gmj.v26i2.8050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Galle Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/gmj.v26i2.8050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:畜牧业中抗生素的滥用极大地促进了抗生素耐药性的发展和传播。本研究确定了家禽饲料中的抗生素活性,并评估了饲养实践知识及其对家禽养殖场主抗菌素耐药性的潜在影响。方法:采用琼脂孔扩散法对斯里兰卡Kegalle区选定农场的家禽饲料和水样进行抗生素活性测试,检测商店出售的家禽饲料和准备供应的家禽饲料和水样对三种对照生物的抗生素活性;测定金黄色葡萄球菌ATCC25923、大肠杆菌ATCC25922和铜绿假单胞菌ATCC27853及其各孔周围的抑制区。对所有农场主进行了访谈,并获得了有关农场的基本细节,如面积、动物数量、水源以及农场主对家禽饲料和水源中抗生素使用的认识。结果:选定商店(5/5)的市售家禽饲料和选定农场(18/18)的待售家禽饲料均未检出抗生素活性。33.33%(6/18)的养殖场水样检测出抗菌效果。78%(14/18)的农场主声称,他们在给动物提供的饮用水中添加了不同类型的含有抗生素的添加剂。44%的农场主认为,在家禽中使用抗生素不是一种好的做法,对人类健康有害,而同样比例的农场主声称,这是一种有利的做法,因为它在经济上有利于他们。没有一个农场主意识到在家禽中使用抗生素会导致社区中抗生素耐药性的增加。结论:商店的市售家禽饲料和农场的即食家禽饲料未显示出任何抗生素活性。然而,在提供给动物的饮用水中检测到抗生素活性,这是由于添加了超出现行准则的含抗生素添加剂。养殖户对家禽抗生素使用的认识及其对社区抗生素耐药性增加的影响并不令人满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antibiotic use in poultry production; a cross-sectional study in a selected district in Sri Lanka
Introduction: Rampant use of antibiotics in animal husbandry contributes significantly to the development and spread of antibiotic resistance. This study determines the antibiotic activity in poultry feed and assesses the knowledge on feeding practices and their potential effects on antimicrobial resistance among poultry farm owners. Methods: Poultry feed available for sale in shops and ready to serve poultry feed and water samples from selected farms in Kegalle District, Sri Lanka were tested for the antibiotic activity using the agar well diffusion method against three control organisms; Staphylococcus aureus ATCC25923, Escherichia coli ATCC25922 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC27853 and the zone of inhibition around each well was measured. All farm owners were interviewed and basic details regarding the farm such as area, number of animals, water source and the awareness of farm owners regarding antibiotic use in poultry feeds and water source were obtained. Results: No antibiotic activity was detected in commercially available poultry feed in selected shops (5/5) and ready to serve poultry feed in selected farms (18/18). An antibacterial effect was detected in water samples collected from 33.33% (6/18) of farms. Seventy-eight percent (14/18) of farm owners declared that they administer different types of additives containing antibiotics along with drinking water served to animals. Forty-four percent of farm owners believe that usage of antibiotics in poultry is not a good practice and harmful for human health while a similar percentage claim that it is a favorable practice as it benefits them economically. None of the farm owners were aware that the use of antibiotics in poultry can contribute to the increasing antibiotic resistance in the community. Conclusion: Commercially available poultry feeds in shops and ready to serve poultry feeds in farms did not demonstrate any antibiotic activity. However, antibiotic activity was detected in drinking water served to animals due to incorporation of antibiotic containing additives beyond the prevailing guidelines. The awareness of farm owners on antibiotic use in poultry and its effects on the increase of antibiotic resistance in the community is unsatisfactory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changing frontiers of cancer care ........ Towards prevention and focused personalised care Metastatic duodenal carcinoma presenting as severe anaemia and extensive bilateral lower limb deep venous thrombosis Retrieval of a sewing needle from the third part of the duodenum with overtube endoscopy Knowledge, attitude and practices on insulin therapy among patients with type 1 diabetes Post-iodination trends in thyroid pathology; 14-year experience at a single center in a goitre endemic area
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1