从Kinect V2.0骨骼数据评估静态身体摇摆的检验方法:对临床康复的影响

Anup K. Mishra, M. Skubic, Brad W. Willis, T. Guess, Swithin S. Razu, C. Abbott, Aaron D. Gray
{"title":"从Kinect V2.0骨骼数据评估静态身体摇摆的检验方法:对临床康复的影响","authors":"Anup K. Mishra, M. Skubic, Brad W. Willis, T. Guess, Swithin S. Razu, C. Abbott, Aaron D. Gray","doi":"10.1145/3154862.3154874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Static body sway is a clinically relevant activity parameter, used to assess postural balance, across a wide spectrum of patient populations. We have examined static body sway using two different segmental total body center of mass (TBCM) estimation methods, the Generator of Body Data III (GEBOD) and Winter's method, using Microsoft Kinect skeletal data. Twenty subjects were recruited through an IRB study and asked to perform three trials of single leg stance with their eyes closed, with positioning based on the Balance Error Scoring System. A force plate system was used to estimate the ground truth data for comparison. Results show that both GEBOD and Winter's method performed similar in estimating anterior-posterior (AP) and medio-lateral (ML) body sway. The results also show highly correlated measurements by the two TBCM estimation methods when compared with the force plate system (mean RMSE value of 10.18 mm square in AP and 8.00 mm square in ML direction). Ordinary Least Square (OLS) linear regressions were performed to improve body sway results obtained from the two methods. Improved sway range values obtained from the simple regression method was able to reduce the estimation errors by 50% (~ 10 mm in both AP and ML body sway). The two static body sway estimation methods were found reliable for obtaining body sway. Thus, the inexpensive, portable Kinect V2.0 can be used for clinical measurements.","PeriodicalId":200810,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining methods to estimate static body sway from the Kinect V2.0 skeletal data: implications for clinical rehabilitation\",\"authors\":\"Anup K. Mishra, M. Skubic, Brad W. Willis, T. Guess, Swithin S. Razu, C. Abbott, Aaron D. Gray\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3154862.3154874\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Static body sway is a clinically relevant activity parameter, used to assess postural balance, across a wide spectrum of patient populations. We have examined static body sway using two different segmental total body center of mass (TBCM) estimation methods, the Generator of Body Data III (GEBOD) and Winter's method, using Microsoft Kinect skeletal data. Twenty subjects were recruited through an IRB study and asked to perform three trials of single leg stance with their eyes closed, with positioning based on the Balance Error Scoring System. A force plate system was used to estimate the ground truth data for comparison. Results show that both GEBOD and Winter's method performed similar in estimating anterior-posterior (AP) and medio-lateral (ML) body sway. The results also show highly correlated measurements by the two TBCM estimation methods when compared with the force plate system (mean RMSE value of 10.18 mm square in AP and 8.00 mm square in ML direction). Ordinary Least Square (OLS) linear regressions were performed to improve body sway results obtained from the two methods. Improved sway range values obtained from the simple regression method was able to reduce the estimation errors by 50% (~ 10 mm in both AP and ML body sway). The two static body sway estimation methods were found reliable for obtaining body sway. Thus, the inexpensive, portable Kinect V2.0 can be used for clinical measurements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":200810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3154862.3154874\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3154862.3154874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

静态身体摇摆是一个临床相关的活动参数,用于评估各种患者群体的姿势平衡。我们使用两种不同的分段总体质量中心(TBCM)估计方法,即身体数据生成器III (GEBOD)和Winter的方法(使用微软Kinect骨骼数据)来检查静态身体摆动。通过IRB研究招募了20名受试者,并要求他们闭上眼睛进行三次单腿站立试验,并根据平衡误差评分系统进行定位。利用测力板系统估算地面真值数据进行比较。结果表明GEBOD和Winter的方法在估计前后(AP)和中外侧(ML)身体摇摆方面表现相似。结果还表明,两种TBCM估计方法的测量结果与力板系统高度相关(AP方向的平均RMSE值为10.18 mm平方,ML方向的平均RMSE值为8.00 mm平方)。用普通最小二乘(OLS)线性回归来改善两种方法得到的身体摇摆结果。由简单回归方法获得的改进的摇摆范围值能够将估计误差降低50% (AP和ML身体摇摆均为~ 10 mm)。结果表明,这两种静态体摆估计方法均能较好地获得体摆。因此,廉价、便携的Kinect V2.0可以用于临床测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining methods to estimate static body sway from the Kinect V2.0 skeletal data: implications for clinical rehabilitation
Static body sway is a clinically relevant activity parameter, used to assess postural balance, across a wide spectrum of patient populations. We have examined static body sway using two different segmental total body center of mass (TBCM) estimation methods, the Generator of Body Data III (GEBOD) and Winter's method, using Microsoft Kinect skeletal data. Twenty subjects were recruited through an IRB study and asked to perform three trials of single leg stance with their eyes closed, with positioning based on the Balance Error Scoring System. A force plate system was used to estimate the ground truth data for comparison. Results show that both GEBOD and Winter's method performed similar in estimating anterior-posterior (AP) and medio-lateral (ML) body sway. The results also show highly correlated measurements by the two TBCM estimation methods when compared with the force plate system (mean RMSE value of 10.18 mm square in AP and 8.00 mm square in ML direction). Ordinary Least Square (OLS) linear regressions were performed to improve body sway results obtained from the two methods. Improved sway range values obtained from the simple regression method was able to reduce the estimation errors by 50% (~ 10 mm in both AP and ML body sway). The two static body sway estimation methods were found reliable for obtaining body sway. Thus, the inexpensive, portable Kinect V2.0 can be used for clinical measurements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gamification mechanics for behavioral change: a systematic review and proposed taxonomy Scaling health analytics to millions without compromising privacy using deep distributed behavior models New frontiers for pervasive telemedicine: from data science in the wild to HoloPresence Intergenerational sharing of health data among family members Automated speech-based screening for alzheimer's disease in a care service scenario
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1