西蒙登与建构主义:对具体化理论的递归贡献

Andrew Feenberg
{"title":"西蒙登与建构主义:对具体化理论的递归贡献","authors":"Andrew Feenberg","doi":"10.1590/S1678-31662015000200002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that Gilbert Simondon's theory of concretization is useful for both science and technology studies (STS) and political theory. By \"concretization\" Simondon means the process of multiplying the functions served by the structures of a device. He gives the example of the air cooled engine which combines cooling and containment in a single structure, the engine case. Concretization contrasts with \"abstract\" designs that add structures for each function, complicating the device and reducing its efficiency. According to Simondon the normal evolution of technologies can be traced in successive concretizations. The aim of this paper is to concretize in a single conceptual framework the functionally distinct notions of \"concretization\" in Simondon and \"actors\" in STS. The combination has important political applications. It shows how apparently contradictory demands can be reconciled through innovation. For example, we are often told that adding new environmental functions to existing technologies will trade off ideology for efficiency. Instead, the new framework opens a perspective on the radical transformation of technology required by ecological modernization and sustainability. In so doing, it suggests a way of reconstructing the Frankfurt School's \"rational critique of reason\" and Marcuse's notion of \"technological rationality\".","PeriodicalId":168872,"journal":{"name":"Scientiae Studia","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simondon e o construtivismo: uma contribuição recursiva à teoria da concretização\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Feenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/S1678-31662015000200002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article argues that Gilbert Simondon's theory of concretization is useful for both science and technology studies (STS) and political theory. By \\\"concretization\\\" Simondon means the process of multiplying the functions served by the structures of a device. He gives the example of the air cooled engine which combines cooling and containment in a single structure, the engine case. Concretization contrasts with \\\"abstract\\\" designs that add structures for each function, complicating the device and reducing its efficiency. According to Simondon the normal evolution of technologies can be traced in successive concretizations. The aim of this paper is to concretize in a single conceptual framework the functionally distinct notions of \\\"concretization\\\" in Simondon and \\\"actors\\\" in STS. The combination has important political applications. It shows how apparently contradictory demands can be reconciled through innovation. For example, we are often told that adding new environmental functions to existing technologies will trade off ideology for efficiency. Instead, the new framework opens a perspective on the radical transformation of technology required by ecological modernization and sustainability. In so doing, it suggests a way of reconstructing the Frankfurt School's \\\"rational critique of reason\\\" and Marcuse's notion of \\\"technological rationality\\\".\",\"PeriodicalId\":168872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientiae Studia\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientiae Studia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662015000200002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientiae Studia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662015000200002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文认为,吉尔伯特·西蒙顿的具体化理论对科学技术研究和政治理论都有借鉴意义。Simondon所说的“具体化”是指将设备结构所提供的功能成倍增加的过程。他举了一个空气冷却发动机的例子,它将冷却和密封结合在一个结构中,即发动机外壳。具体化与“抽象”设计形成对比,“抽象”设计为每个功能添加结构,使设备复杂化并降低其效率。根据西蒙顿的说法,技术的正常演变可以追溯到连续的具体化。本文的目的是在一个单一的概念框架中具体化西蒙顿的“具体化”和STS的“行动者”这两个功能上截然不同的概念。这种组合具有重要的政治应用。它展示了如何通过创新来调和看似矛盾的需求。例如,我们经常被告知,在现有技术上增加新的环境功能将以意识形态为代价换取效率。相反,新的框架为生态现代化和可持续性所需的技术的彻底转变打开了一个视角。在此过程中,它提出了一种重建法兰克福学派“理性批判”和马尔库塞“技术理性”概念的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Simondon e o construtivismo: uma contribuição recursiva à teoria da concretização
This article argues that Gilbert Simondon's theory of concretization is useful for both science and technology studies (STS) and political theory. By "concretization" Simondon means the process of multiplying the functions served by the structures of a device. He gives the example of the air cooled engine which combines cooling and containment in a single structure, the engine case. Concretization contrasts with "abstract" designs that add structures for each function, complicating the device and reducing its efficiency. According to Simondon the normal evolution of technologies can be traced in successive concretizations. The aim of this paper is to concretize in a single conceptual framework the functionally distinct notions of "concretization" in Simondon and "actors" in STS. The combination has important political applications. It shows how apparently contradictory demands can be reconciled through innovation. For example, we are often told that adding new environmental functions to existing technologies will trade off ideology for efficiency. Instead, the new framework opens a perspective on the radical transformation of technology required by ecological modernization and sustainability. In so doing, it suggests a way of reconstructing the Frankfurt School's "rational critique of reason" and Marcuse's notion of "technological rationality".
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
La evolución según Dobzhansky: creacionismo, linealidad y progreso Invención y explicación: la comprensión científica en biología El papel del pensamiento poblacional en la teoría de la doble herencia El olvido del organismo: un análisis de las concepciones acerca de lo vivo y su valor en la biología actual Marcel Weber y la filosofía de la biología experimental: la cultura material de las ciencias entre pasado y futuro
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1