{"title":"采用联合中继器插入和编码的低功耗总线设计","authors":"S. Sridhara, Naresh R Shanbhag","doi":"10.1145/1077603.1077629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we propose joint repeater insertion and crosstalk avoidance coding as a low-power alternative to repeater insertion for global bus design in nanometer technologies. We develop a methodology to calculate the repeater size and separation that minimize the total power dissipation for joint repeater insertion and coding for a specific delay target. This methodology is employed to obtain power vs. delay trade-offs for 130-nm, 90-nm, 65-nm, and 45-nm technology nodes. Using ITRS technology scaling data, we show that proposed technique provides 54%, 67%, and 69% power savings over optimally repeater-inserted 10-mm 32-bit bus at 90-nm, 65-nm, and 45-nm technology nodes, respectively, while achieving the same delay.","PeriodicalId":256018,"journal":{"name":"ISLPED '05. Proceedings of the 2005 International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design, 2005.","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A low-power bus design using joint repeater insertion and coding\",\"authors\":\"S. Sridhara, Naresh R Shanbhag\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1077603.1077629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we propose joint repeater insertion and crosstalk avoidance coding as a low-power alternative to repeater insertion for global bus design in nanometer technologies. We develop a methodology to calculate the repeater size and separation that minimize the total power dissipation for joint repeater insertion and coding for a specific delay target. This methodology is employed to obtain power vs. delay trade-offs for 130-nm, 90-nm, 65-nm, and 45-nm technology nodes. Using ITRS technology scaling data, we show that proposed technique provides 54%, 67%, and 69% power savings over optimally repeater-inserted 10-mm 32-bit bus at 90-nm, 65-nm, and 45-nm technology nodes, respectively, while achieving the same delay.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISLPED '05. Proceedings of the 2005 International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design, 2005.\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISLPED '05. Proceedings of the 2005 International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design, 2005.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1077603.1077629\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISLPED '05. Proceedings of the 2005 International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design, 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1077603.1077629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A low-power bus design using joint repeater insertion and coding
In this paper, we propose joint repeater insertion and crosstalk avoidance coding as a low-power alternative to repeater insertion for global bus design in nanometer technologies. We develop a methodology to calculate the repeater size and separation that minimize the total power dissipation for joint repeater insertion and coding for a specific delay target. This methodology is employed to obtain power vs. delay trade-offs for 130-nm, 90-nm, 65-nm, and 45-nm technology nodes. Using ITRS technology scaling data, we show that proposed technique provides 54%, 67%, and 69% power savings over optimally repeater-inserted 10-mm 32-bit bus at 90-nm, 65-nm, and 45-nm technology nodes, respectively, while achieving the same delay.