《武装与危险》:安吉拉·戴维斯的刑事定罪与冷战时期美国清白的神话

M. Roman
{"title":"《武装与危险》:安吉拉·戴维斯的刑事定罪与冷战时期美国清白的神话","authors":"M. Roman","doi":"10.5406/womgenfamcol.8.1.0087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay explores the arrest, imprisonment, and trial of Angela Davis as the most politically charged legal defense case of the détente era of the Cold War that drew international attention over a nearly two-year period (1970–72). It demonstrates that the life of this young black female intellectual in post-civil rights America became inseparable from securing (or contesting) the dominant narrative of U.S. democratic superiority. Davis, her family, and legal team insisted that racism and politics motivated the criminal charges against her and that a transnational movement was imperative to ensuring her safety as a black woman communist in the American justice system. U.S. leaders and mainstream journalists dismissed the veracity of such claims, ridiculed Davis’s fears for her safety, and asserted that political trials and racism existed only “over there” in the communist universe. They racialized Davis as a “black militant,” invoking traditional sexist–racist tropes of black women as emotionally unstable, sexual sirens, in order to reassure the American public of the righteousness of U.S. democracy and of Davis’s concomitant guilt. After an all-white jury acquitted Davis of all criminal charges, the mainstream press hailed the acquittal as evidence not of Davis’s innocence but as proof that she was wrong about America. Davis persisted in contesting on a world stage America’s Cold War claims of democratic moral superiority and traveled to the Soviet Union to thank leaders for helping spearhead the international campaign that she credited for saving her life.","PeriodicalId":223911,"journal":{"name":"Women, Gender, and Families of Color","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Armed and Dangerous”: The Criminalization of Angela Davis and the Cold War Myth of America’s Innocence\",\"authors\":\"M. Roman\",\"doi\":\"10.5406/womgenfamcol.8.1.0087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This essay explores the arrest, imprisonment, and trial of Angela Davis as the most politically charged legal defense case of the détente era of the Cold War that drew international attention over a nearly two-year period (1970–72). It demonstrates that the life of this young black female intellectual in post-civil rights America became inseparable from securing (or contesting) the dominant narrative of U.S. democratic superiority. Davis, her family, and legal team insisted that racism and politics motivated the criminal charges against her and that a transnational movement was imperative to ensuring her safety as a black woman communist in the American justice system. U.S. leaders and mainstream journalists dismissed the veracity of such claims, ridiculed Davis’s fears for her safety, and asserted that political trials and racism existed only “over there” in the communist universe. They racialized Davis as a “black militant,” invoking traditional sexist–racist tropes of black women as emotionally unstable, sexual sirens, in order to reassure the American public of the righteousness of U.S. democracy and of Davis’s concomitant guilt. After an all-white jury acquitted Davis of all criminal charges, the mainstream press hailed the acquittal as evidence not of Davis’s innocence but as proof that she was wrong about America. Davis persisted in contesting on a world stage America’s Cold War claims of democratic moral superiority and traveled to the Soviet Union to thank leaders for helping spearhead the international campaign that she credited for saving her life.\",\"PeriodicalId\":223911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women, Gender, and Families of Color\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women, Gender, and Families of Color\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5406/womgenfamcol.8.1.0087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women, Gender, and Families of Color","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/womgenfamcol.8.1.0087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:本文探讨了安吉拉·戴维斯(Angela Davis)的被捕、监禁和审判,这是冷战时期(1970 - 1972年)最具政治色彩的法律辩护案件,引起了近两年的国际关注。它表明,在民权运动后的美国,这位年轻的黑人女性知识分子的生活与维护(或反对)美国民主优越性的主导叙事密不可分。戴维斯、她的家人和法律团队坚持认为,种族主义和政治动机是对她的刑事指控的动机,而一场跨国运动是必要的,以确保她作为一名黑人女性共产主义者在美国司法体系中的安全。美国领导人和主流记者驳斥了这种说法的真实性,嘲笑戴维斯对她安全的担忧,并断言政治审判和种族主义只存在于共产主义世界的“那边”。他们将戴维斯种族化为“黑人激进分子”,援引传统的性别歧视-种族主义的比喻,将黑人妇女视为情绪不稳定、性感的塞壬,目的是让美国公众相信美国民主的正义性和戴维斯随之而来的罪恶感。在一个全是白人的陪审团宣告戴维斯无罪后,主流媒体欢呼说,这不是戴维斯无罪的证据,而是证明她对美国的看法是错误的。戴维斯坚持在世界舞台上挑战美国冷战时期宣称的民主道德优越感,并前往苏联感谢领导人帮助领导国际运动,她认为这场运动救了她的命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Armed and Dangerous”: The Criminalization of Angela Davis and the Cold War Myth of America’s Innocence
Abstract:This essay explores the arrest, imprisonment, and trial of Angela Davis as the most politically charged legal defense case of the détente era of the Cold War that drew international attention over a nearly two-year period (1970–72). It demonstrates that the life of this young black female intellectual in post-civil rights America became inseparable from securing (or contesting) the dominant narrative of U.S. democratic superiority. Davis, her family, and legal team insisted that racism and politics motivated the criminal charges against her and that a transnational movement was imperative to ensuring her safety as a black woman communist in the American justice system. U.S. leaders and mainstream journalists dismissed the veracity of such claims, ridiculed Davis’s fears for her safety, and asserted that political trials and racism existed only “over there” in the communist universe. They racialized Davis as a “black militant,” invoking traditional sexist–racist tropes of black women as emotionally unstable, sexual sirens, in order to reassure the American public of the righteousness of U.S. democracy and of Davis’s concomitant guilt. After an all-white jury acquitted Davis of all criminal charges, the mainstream press hailed the acquittal as evidence not of Davis’s innocence but as proof that she was wrong about America. Davis persisted in contesting on a world stage America’s Cold War claims of democratic moral superiority and traveled to the Soviet Union to thank leaders for helping spearhead the international campaign that she credited for saving her life.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"She's Been Doing Everything Right": Mothers of Color and Economic Violence Erased by Respectability: The Intersections of AIDS, Race, and Gender in Black America Introduction: In memoriam: bell hooks, 1952–2021 Challenging Misrepresentations of Black Womanhood: Media, Literature and Theory Labor Organizer Nannie Helen Burroughs and Her National Training School for Women and Girls
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1