东亚区域主义与韩中日三方合作

Jooyung Hong
{"title":"东亚区域主义与韩中日三方合作","authors":"Jooyung Hong","doi":"10.33127/kdps.2022.44.1.85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What makes ‘the trilateral cooperation’ possible? What were the factors that enable the formation or development of cooperation among Korea, China, and Japan? And did the trilateral cooperation stagnate when there were insufficient factors to increase cooperation? In response to this question, this study examines the development of regional politics in East Asia concretely, and pays attention to the chain of East Asian cooperation and how the trilateral cooperation mechanism among Korea, China, and Japan was formed in the process. \nAlthough it has not established an integrated organization in East Asia like EU, there has been various attempts to expand and promote regional cooperation system from ASPAC to ASEAN, APEC, ARF, ASEM, ASEAN+3(APT), EAS and TCS. From the Cold War until now, East Asian regionalism is trying to evolve into institutionalization through diplomatic initiatives and strategies of countries in the region. \nThis paper analyzes the mechanism of trilateral cooperation was enabled by the overlapping of membership of the East Asian Regional cooperation, and the fluctuation of dynamics in East Asia can be repeatedly appeared depending on the direction of diplomatic strategy for regional cooperation.","PeriodicalId":281089,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Association for Political and Diplomatic History","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"East Asian Regionalism and the Trilateral Cooperation among South Korea, China and Japan\",\"authors\":\"Jooyung Hong\",\"doi\":\"10.33127/kdps.2022.44.1.85\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What makes ‘the trilateral cooperation’ possible? What were the factors that enable the formation or development of cooperation among Korea, China, and Japan? And did the trilateral cooperation stagnate when there were insufficient factors to increase cooperation? In response to this question, this study examines the development of regional politics in East Asia concretely, and pays attention to the chain of East Asian cooperation and how the trilateral cooperation mechanism among Korea, China, and Japan was formed in the process. \\nAlthough it has not established an integrated organization in East Asia like EU, there has been various attempts to expand and promote regional cooperation system from ASPAC to ASEAN, APEC, ARF, ASEM, ASEAN+3(APT), EAS and TCS. From the Cold War until now, East Asian regionalism is trying to evolve into institutionalization through diplomatic initiatives and strategies of countries in the region. \\nThis paper analyzes the mechanism of trilateral cooperation was enabled by the overlapping of membership of the East Asian Regional cooperation, and the fluctuation of dynamics in East Asia can be repeatedly appeared depending on the direction of diplomatic strategy for regional cooperation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":281089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Korean Association for Political and Diplomatic History\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Korean Association for Political and Diplomatic History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33127/kdps.2022.44.1.85\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Association for Political and Diplomatic History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33127/kdps.2022.44.1.85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

是什么让“中日韩合作”成为可能?韩中日三国合作的形成和发展的原因是什么?中日韩合作是否因为缺乏加强合作的因素而停滞不前?针对这一问题,本研究具体考察了东亚地区政治的发展,并关注了东亚合作的链条以及韩中日三边合作机制是如何在此过程中形成的。虽然没有像欧盟那样在东亚建立一个一体化组织,但从亚太地区到东盟、亚太经合组织、东盟地区论坛、亚欧会议、东盟与中日韩(10 +3)、东亚峰会、TCS等区域合作体系的扩展和推进都有各种尝试。从冷战到现在,东亚地区主义正试图通过地区各国的外交倡议和战略向制度化发展。本文分析了东亚区域合作成员国的重叠促成了三边合作的机制,东亚地区动态的波动会随着区域合作外交战略的走向而反复出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
East Asian Regionalism and the Trilateral Cooperation among South Korea, China and Japan
What makes ‘the trilateral cooperation’ possible? What were the factors that enable the formation or development of cooperation among Korea, China, and Japan? And did the trilateral cooperation stagnate when there were insufficient factors to increase cooperation? In response to this question, this study examines the development of regional politics in East Asia concretely, and pays attention to the chain of East Asian cooperation and how the trilateral cooperation mechanism among Korea, China, and Japan was formed in the process. Although it has not established an integrated organization in East Asia like EU, there has been various attempts to expand and promote regional cooperation system from ASPAC to ASEAN, APEC, ARF, ASEM, ASEAN+3(APT), EAS and TCS. From the Cold War until now, East Asian regionalism is trying to evolve into institutionalization through diplomatic initiatives and strategies of countries in the region. This paper analyzes the mechanism of trilateral cooperation was enabled by the overlapping of membership of the East Asian Regional cooperation, and the fluctuation of dynamics in East Asia can be repeatedly appeared depending on the direction of diplomatic strategy for regional cooperation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Maritime Defence Plan and Joseon in the 19th century Qing dynasty: Focusing on the Qing Dynasty’s Vassal Policy & “the Gateway Perception” Pathway for ROK-US Alliance : Global Comprehensive Strategic Alliance and Conventional-Nuclear Integration(CNI) Shimane Prefecture’s perception of the waters around Dokdo Island surrounding the Peace Line: Politicization of fishing rights A Study of a Solution to Diplomatic Problems in Northeast Asia Using Seo Hee’s Diplomatic Strategy Presidential Elections in Post-Democratic Korea: History and the Principles of Competition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1