估计深度学习的不确定性,以在分割核图像数据时向临床医生报告信心

Biraja Ghoshal, A. Tucker, B. Sanghera, W. Wong
{"title":"估计深度学习的不确定性,以在分割核图像数据时向临床医生报告信心","authors":"Biraja Ghoshal, A. Tucker, B. Sanghera, W. Wong","doi":"10.1109/CBMS.2019.00072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deep Learning, which involves powerful black box predictors, has achieved a state-of-the-art performance in medical image analysis such as segmentation and classification for diagnosis. However, in spite of these successes, these methods focus exclusively on improving the accuracy of point predictions without assessing the quality of their outputs. Knowing how much confidence there is in a prediction is essential for gaining clinicians' trust in the technology. Monte-Carlo dropout in neural networks is equivalent to a specific variational approximation in Bayesian neural networks and is simple to implement without any changes in the network architecture. It is considered state-of-the-art for estimating uncertainty. However, in classification, it does not model the predictive probabilities. This means that we are not capturing the true underlying uncertainty in the prediction. In this paper, we propose an uncertainty estimation framework for classification by decomposing predictive probabilities into two main types of uncertainty in Bayesian modelling: aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty (representing uncertainty in the quality of the data and in the model parameters, respectively). We demonstrate that the proposed uncertainty quantification framework using the Bayesian Residual U-Net (BRUNet) provides additional insight for clinicians when analysing images with help from deep learners. In addition, we demonstrate how the resulting uncertainty depends on the dropout rates using images from nuclei in divergent medical images.","PeriodicalId":311634,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 32nd International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS)","volume":"222 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating Uncertainty in Deep Learning for Reporting Confidence to Clinicians when Segmenting Nuclei Image Data\",\"authors\":\"Biraja Ghoshal, A. Tucker, B. Sanghera, W. Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CBMS.2019.00072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Deep Learning, which involves powerful black box predictors, has achieved a state-of-the-art performance in medical image analysis such as segmentation and classification for diagnosis. However, in spite of these successes, these methods focus exclusively on improving the accuracy of point predictions without assessing the quality of their outputs. Knowing how much confidence there is in a prediction is essential for gaining clinicians' trust in the technology. Monte-Carlo dropout in neural networks is equivalent to a specific variational approximation in Bayesian neural networks and is simple to implement without any changes in the network architecture. It is considered state-of-the-art for estimating uncertainty. However, in classification, it does not model the predictive probabilities. This means that we are not capturing the true underlying uncertainty in the prediction. In this paper, we propose an uncertainty estimation framework for classification by decomposing predictive probabilities into two main types of uncertainty in Bayesian modelling: aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty (representing uncertainty in the quality of the data and in the model parameters, respectively). We demonstrate that the proposed uncertainty quantification framework using the Bayesian Residual U-Net (BRUNet) provides additional insight for clinicians when analysing images with help from deep learners. In addition, we demonstrate how the resulting uncertainty depends on the dropout rates using images from nuclei in divergent medical images.\",\"PeriodicalId\":311634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE 32nd International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS)\",\"volume\":\"222 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE 32nd International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBMS.2019.00072\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 32nd International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBMS.2019.00072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

深度学习涉及强大的黑匣子预测器,在医学图像分析中取得了最先进的性能,例如用于诊断的分割和分类。然而,尽管取得了这些成功,这些方法只关注于提高点预测的准确性,而没有评估其输出的质量。了解对预测有多大的信心对于获得临床医生对该技术的信任至关重要。神经网络中的蒙特卡罗dropout等价于贝叶斯神经网络中的特定变分近似,实现简单,不需要改变网络结构。它被认为是最先进的估计不确定性。然而,在分类中,它没有对预测概率进行建模。这意味着我们没有捕捉到预测中真正潜在的不确定性。在本文中,我们提出了一个分类的不确定性估计框架,将预测概率分解为贝叶斯建模中的两种主要不确定性类型:任意不确定性和认知不确定性(分别表示数据质量和模型参数的不确定性)。我们证明,使用贝叶斯残差U-Net (BRUNet)提出的不确定性量化框架为临床医生在深度学习器的帮助下分析图像提供了额外的见解。此外,我们演示了如何产生的不确定性取决于使用图像从核在发散医学图像的辍学率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimating Uncertainty in Deep Learning for Reporting Confidence to Clinicians when Segmenting Nuclei Image Data
Deep Learning, which involves powerful black box predictors, has achieved a state-of-the-art performance in medical image analysis such as segmentation and classification for diagnosis. However, in spite of these successes, these methods focus exclusively on improving the accuracy of point predictions without assessing the quality of their outputs. Knowing how much confidence there is in a prediction is essential for gaining clinicians' trust in the technology. Monte-Carlo dropout in neural networks is equivalent to a specific variational approximation in Bayesian neural networks and is simple to implement without any changes in the network architecture. It is considered state-of-the-art for estimating uncertainty. However, in classification, it does not model the predictive probabilities. This means that we are not capturing the true underlying uncertainty in the prediction. In this paper, we propose an uncertainty estimation framework for classification by decomposing predictive probabilities into two main types of uncertainty in Bayesian modelling: aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty (representing uncertainty in the quality of the data and in the model parameters, respectively). We demonstrate that the proposed uncertainty quantification framework using the Bayesian Residual U-Net (BRUNet) provides additional insight for clinicians when analysing images with help from deep learners. In addition, we demonstrate how the resulting uncertainty depends on the dropout rates using images from nuclei in divergent medical images.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysing the Performance of a Real-Time Healthcare 4.0 System using Shared Frailty Time to Event Models Performance of Data Enhancements and Training Optimization for Neural Network: A Polyp Detection Case Study I Know How you Feel Now, and Here's why!: Demystifying Time-Continuous High Resolution Text-Based Affect Predictions in the Wild Identifying Diabetic Retinopathy from OCT Images using Deep Transfer Learning with Artificial Neural Networks Towards an Analysis of Post-Transcriptional Gene Regulation in Psoriasis via microRNAs using Machine Learning Algorithms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1