工艺设计套件的质量保证体系和框架

M. Scott, M. Peralta, J. Carothers
{"title":"工艺设计套件的质量保证体系和框架","authors":"M. Scott, M. Peralta, J. Carothers","doi":"10.1109/ISQED.2003.1194722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we evaluate the dependencies between tools, data and environment in process design kits. and present a framework for systematically analyzing the quality of the design tools and libraries through the design flow. The framework consists of a regression engine which executes sets of tests in a distributed computing environment. These tests vary from simulations to validate models and simulators, to tests on layout versus schematics, parasitics extraction accuracy, and ultimately, tests to validate the extracted circuit integrity against the ideal. In particular, it is shown that test-chaining is required to obtain confidence in the simulation-to-silicon equivalence. A secondary objective is to identify and quantify the peak-error injection points. Finally, future work is outlined to extend the framework to automate entire design flows and provide capability for inter-tool constraint satisfaction and design optimization.","PeriodicalId":448890,"journal":{"name":"Fourth International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design, 2003. Proceedings.","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"System and framework for QA of process design kits\",\"authors\":\"M. Scott, M. Peralta, J. Carothers\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISQED.2003.1194722\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we evaluate the dependencies between tools, data and environment in process design kits. and present a framework for systematically analyzing the quality of the design tools and libraries through the design flow. The framework consists of a regression engine which executes sets of tests in a distributed computing environment. These tests vary from simulations to validate models and simulators, to tests on layout versus schematics, parasitics extraction accuracy, and ultimately, tests to validate the extracted circuit integrity against the ideal. In particular, it is shown that test-chaining is required to obtain confidence in the simulation-to-silicon equivalence. A secondary objective is to identify and quantify the peak-error injection points. Finally, future work is outlined to extend the framework to automate entire design flows and provide capability for inter-tool constraint satisfaction and design optimization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fourth International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design, 2003. Proceedings.\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fourth International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design, 2003. Proceedings.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISQED.2003.1194722\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fourth International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design, 2003. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISQED.2003.1194722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在本文中,我们评估了过程设计套件中工具、数据和环境之间的依赖关系。并提出了一个通过设计流程系统分析设计工具和库质量的框架。该框架由一个回归引擎组成,该引擎在分布式计算环境中执行一系列测试。这些测试从验证模型和模拟器的模拟,到对布局与原理图的测试,寄生提取精度的测试,以及最终验证提取电路完整性的测试。特别指出,为了获得模拟-硅等效的置信度,需要测试链。第二个目标是识别和量化峰值误差注入点。最后,概述了未来的工作,以扩展框架,使整个设计流程自动化,并提供工具间约束满足和设计优化的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
System and framework for QA of process design kits
In this paper, we evaluate the dependencies between tools, data and environment in process design kits. and present a framework for systematically analyzing the quality of the design tools and libraries through the design flow. The framework consists of a regression engine which executes sets of tests in a distributed computing environment. These tests vary from simulations to validate models and simulators, to tests on layout versus schematics, parasitics extraction accuracy, and ultimately, tests to validate the extracted circuit integrity against the ideal. In particular, it is shown that test-chaining is required to obtain confidence in the simulation-to-silicon equivalence. A secondary objective is to identify and quantify the peak-error injection points. Finally, future work is outlined to extend the framework to automate entire design flows and provide capability for inter-tool constraint satisfaction and design optimization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Statistical modeling for circuit simulation Coupled simulation of circuit and piezoelectric laminates Addressing the IC designer's needs: integrated design software for faster, more economical chip design Benchmarks for interconnect parasitic resistance and capacitance Analysis of IR-drop scaling with implications for deep submicron P/G network designs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1