博尔赫斯和卡夫卡独角兽的可能性

B. Levinson
{"title":"博尔赫斯和卡夫卡独角兽的可能性","authors":"B. Levinson","doi":"10.3138/ycl.63.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The relationship between Jorge Luis Borges and deconstruction has been much investigated, yet rarely has this research addressed the fact that both projects share the conviction that neither language nor text exist. Obviously, neither discourse denies that language and text are there. Yet they are not, here, presences: they are not objects before a subject, hence beings, not even imaginary beings. Departing from a close reading of Jacques Derrida's insistence that \"language does not exist, no one has ever encountered it,\" this article scrutinizes the way in which this \"non-existence\" opens a path for a rethinking of history, literary history, Latin American aesthetics, and Latin American cultural studies. Also offered are novel interpretations of Borges's \"Funes, His Memory,\" \"Kafka and His Precursors,\" and The Book of Imaginary Beings.","PeriodicalId":342699,"journal":{"name":"The Yearbook of Comparative Literature","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Possibility of the Unicorn in Borges and Kafka\",\"authors\":\"B. Levinson\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/ycl.63.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The relationship between Jorge Luis Borges and deconstruction has been much investigated, yet rarely has this research addressed the fact that both projects share the conviction that neither language nor text exist. Obviously, neither discourse denies that language and text are there. Yet they are not, here, presences: they are not objects before a subject, hence beings, not even imaginary beings. Departing from a close reading of Jacques Derrida's insistence that \\\"language does not exist, no one has ever encountered it,\\\" this article scrutinizes the way in which this \\\"non-existence\\\" opens a path for a rethinking of history, literary history, Latin American aesthetics, and Latin American cultural studies. Also offered are novel interpretations of Borges's \\\"Funes, His Memory,\\\" \\\"Kafka and His Precursors,\\\" and The Book of Imaginary Beings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":342699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Yearbook of Comparative Literature\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Yearbook of Comparative Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/ycl.63.006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Yearbook of Comparative Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ycl.63.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:博尔赫斯与解构主义之间的关系已经得到了很多研究,但很少有研究涉及这样一个事实:这两个项目都有一个共同的信念,即语言和文本都不存在。显然,两种话语都不否认语言和文本的存在。然而,在这里,它们不是在场:它们不是主体面前的客体,因此不是存在,甚至不是想象的存在。本文从对雅克·德里达(Jacques Derrida)坚持的“语言不存在,没有人遇到过它”的仔细阅读出发,仔细审视了这种“不存在”如何为重新思考历史、文学史、拉丁美洲美学和拉丁美洲文化研究开辟了一条道路。此外,博尔赫斯的《福内斯,他的记忆》、《卡夫卡和他的先驱》以及《想象之书》也有新的解读。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Possibility of the Unicorn in Borges and Kafka
Abstract:The relationship between Jorge Luis Borges and deconstruction has been much investigated, yet rarely has this research addressed the fact that both projects share the conviction that neither language nor text exist. Obviously, neither discourse denies that language and text are there. Yet they are not, here, presences: they are not objects before a subject, hence beings, not even imaginary beings. Departing from a close reading of Jacques Derrida's insistence that "language does not exist, no one has ever encountered it," this article scrutinizes the way in which this "non-existence" opens a path for a rethinking of history, literary history, Latin American aesthetics, and Latin American cultural studies. Also offered are novel interpretations of Borges's "Funes, His Memory," "Kafka and His Precursors," and The Book of Imaginary Beings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“A Stratagem for Self-Oblivion”: Rosselli, Real Talk, and the Abolition of the “I” Foreign Poems Damage and Repair in Environmental Assessment A Seafloor for the Disaster Receding Margins: Black Rice and the Rhythms of Tidal Transfer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1