在ABB公司开展现场缺陷预测和产品测试优先级工作的经验和结果。

P. Li, J. Herbsleb, M. Shaw, Brian P. Robinson
{"title":"在ABB公司开展现场缺陷预测和产品测试优先级工作的经验和结果。","authors":"P. Li, J. Herbsleb, M. Shaw, Brian P. Robinson","doi":"10.1145/1134285.1134343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quantitatively-based risk management can reduce the risks associated with field defects for both software producers and software consumers. In this paper, we report experiences and results from initiating risk-management activities at a large systems development organization. The initiated activities aim to improve product testing (system/integration testing), to improve maintenance resource allocation, and to plan for future process improvements. The experiences we report address practical issues not commonly addressed in research studies: how to select an appropriate modeling method for product testing prioritization and process improvement planning, how to evaluate accuracy of predictions across multiple releases in time, and how to conduct analysis with incomplete information. In addition, we report initial empirical results for two systems with 13 and 15 releases. We present prioritization of configurations to guide product testing, field defect predictions within the first year of deployment to aid maintenance resource allocation, and important predictors across both systems to guide process improvement planning. Our results and experiences are steps towards quantitatively-based risk management.","PeriodicalId":246572,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"88","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiences and results from initiating field defect prediction and product test prioritization efforts at ABB Inc.\",\"authors\":\"P. Li, J. Herbsleb, M. Shaw, Brian P. Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1134285.1134343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Quantitatively-based risk management can reduce the risks associated with field defects for both software producers and software consumers. In this paper, we report experiences and results from initiating risk-management activities at a large systems development organization. The initiated activities aim to improve product testing (system/integration testing), to improve maintenance resource allocation, and to plan for future process improvements. The experiences we report address practical issues not commonly addressed in research studies: how to select an appropriate modeling method for product testing prioritization and process improvement planning, how to evaluate accuracy of predictions across multiple releases in time, and how to conduct analysis with incomplete information. In addition, we report initial empirical results for two systems with 13 and 15 releases. We present prioritization of configurations to guide product testing, field defect predictions within the first year of deployment to aid maintenance resource allocation, and important predictors across both systems to guide process improvement planning. Our results and experiences are steps towards quantitatively-based risk management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":246572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"88\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1134285.1134343\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1134285.1134343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 88

摘要

基于定量的风险管理可以为软件生产者和软件消费者减少与领域缺陷相关的风险。在本文中,我们报告了在大型系统开发组织中启动风险管理活动的经验和结果。已启动的活动旨在改进产品测试(系统/集成测试),改进维护资源分配,并计划未来的过程改进。我们报告的经验解决了在研究中通常没有解决的实际问题:如何为产品测试优先级和过程改进计划选择合适的建模方法,如何评估跨多个发布的预测的准确性,以及如何使用不完整的信息进行分析。此外,我们报告了具有13和15个版本的两个系统的初始经验结果。我们提出了配置的优先级,以指导产品测试,在部署的第一年进行现场缺陷预测,以帮助维护资源分配,以及跨两个系统的重要预测,以指导过程改进计划。我们的成果和经验是迈向定量风险管理的步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experiences and results from initiating field defect prediction and product test prioritization efforts at ABB Inc.
Quantitatively-based risk management can reduce the risks associated with field defects for both software producers and software consumers. In this paper, we report experiences and results from initiating risk-management activities at a large systems development organization. The initiated activities aim to improve product testing (system/integration testing), to improve maintenance resource allocation, and to plan for future process improvements. The experiences we report address practical issues not commonly addressed in research studies: how to select an appropriate modeling method for product testing prioritization and process improvement planning, how to evaluate accuracy of predictions across multiple releases in time, and how to conduct analysis with incomplete information. In addition, we report initial empirical results for two systems with 13 and 15 releases. We present prioritization of configurations to guide product testing, field defect predictions within the first year of deployment to aid maintenance resource allocation, and important predictors across both systems to guide process improvement planning. Our results and experiences are steps towards quantitatively-based risk management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"How do I know what I have to do?": the role of the inquiry culture in requirements communication for distributed software development projects Software evolution: analysis and visualization Distributed development: an education perspective on the global studio project An empirical study on decision making in off-the-shelf component-based development Session details: Research papers: architecture & design I
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1