有尊严的女权主义法理学适用于强奸,性骚扰和荣誉准则

Ôrît Kāmîr
{"title":"有尊严的女权主义法理学适用于强奸,性骚扰和荣誉准则","authors":"Ôrît Kāmîr","doi":"10.4337/9781786439697.00027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Feminist insights, ideas, initiatives and agendas are not – and should not be – confined to a single, specific value system. Because they are amenable to various theories and ideologies, they may benefit from multiple worldviews and terminologies. Since its modern beginnings in the nineteenth century, feminism has mastered diverse value-languages, each relevant to a particular context. Within the framework of classical liberalism and the assertion of equal rationality and thus autonomy and civil liberties, liberal feminism claimed that all women were equally rational, autonomous and deserving of civil liberties.1 As sensitivity to dominance and the oppression of subjugated classes by hegemonic groups grew, radical feminism set out to eradicate suppressive hegemonic patriarchalism and liberate dominated women as a class.2 With the proud proclamation of minority distinctiveness, relational feminists began demanding that women be acknowledged and celebrated for their nurturing and caring constitution.3 The development of identity politics led to the emergence of black, lesbian, religious and numerous other feminisms, intersectionality, postmodernism, post-colonialism and neoconservatism, all inspiring lively feminist vocabularies and patterns of thought.4 This flexibility, versatility and adaptability has allowed feminism to become relevant to a wide range of audiences across diverse times and places, attesting to the movement’s vitality. And yet, academic feminists have largely neglected the study of human dignity as a central organizing value. This is anomalous. Across the globe, human dignity, the inherent value of humanity per se, is increasingly regarded as the basis of human rights. The United Nations declared, on 10 December 1948, that human dignity is the foundation of universal, fundamental human rights.5 Nourishing contemporary humanism and underlying and framing international human rights discourse, human dignity has, over the decades since, formed the basis of multiple constitutions and treaties.","PeriodicalId":275645,"journal":{"name":"Research Handbook on Feminist Jurisprudence","volume":"2012 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A dignitarian feminist jurisprudence with applications to rape, sexual harassment and honor codes\",\"authors\":\"Ôrît Kāmîr\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/9781786439697.00027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Feminist insights, ideas, initiatives and agendas are not – and should not be – confined to a single, specific value system. Because they are amenable to various theories and ideologies, they may benefit from multiple worldviews and terminologies. Since its modern beginnings in the nineteenth century, feminism has mastered diverse value-languages, each relevant to a particular context. Within the framework of classical liberalism and the assertion of equal rationality and thus autonomy and civil liberties, liberal feminism claimed that all women were equally rational, autonomous and deserving of civil liberties.1 As sensitivity to dominance and the oppression of subjugated classes by hegemonic groups grew, radical feminism set out to eradicate suppressive hegemonic patriarchalism and liberate dominated women as a class.2 With the proud proclamation of minority distinctiveness, relational feminists began demanding that women be acknowledged and celebrated for their nurturing and caring constitution.3 The development of identity politics led to the emergence of black, lesbian, religious and numerous other feminisms, intersectionality, postmodernism, post-colonialism and neoconservatism, all inspiring lively feminist vocabularies and patterns of thought.4 This flexibility, versatility and adaptability has allowed feminism to become relevant to a wide range of audiences across diverse times and places, attesting to the movement’s vitality. And yet, academic feminists have largely neglected the study of human dignity as a central organizing value. This is anomalous. Across the globe, human dignity, the inherent value of humanity per se, is increasingly regarded as the basis of human rights. The United Nations declared, on 10 December 1948, that human dignity is the foundation of universal, fundamental human rights.5 Nourishing contemporary humanism and underlying and framing international human rights discourse, human dignity has, over the decades since, formed the basis of multiple constitutions and treaties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Handbook on Feminist Jurisprudence\",\"volume\":\"2012 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Handbook on Feminist Jurisprudence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786439697.00027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Handbook on Feminist Jurisprudence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786439697.00027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

女权主义的见解、想法、倡议和议程不是——也不应该——局限于一个单一的、特定的价值体系。因为他们接受不同的理论和意识形态,他们可能受益于多种世界观和术语。自19世纪现代女权主义开始以来,女权主义掌握了多种价值语言,每种语言都与特定的语境有关。自由主义女性主义在古典自由主义的框架内,主张平等的理性,从而主张自主和公民自由,主张所有的女性都是平等的理性、自主的,都应该享有公民自由随着对霸权群体对统治地位和被征服阶级压迫的敏感性的增长,激进女权主义开始根除压迫性的霸权男权主义,解放被统治的女性这个阶级随着对少数民族独特性的自豪宣告,关系女权主义者开始要求承认和庆祝妇女的养育和关怀宪法身份政治的发展导致了黑人、女同性恋、宗教和许多其他女权主义、交叉性、后现代主义、后殖民主义和新保守主义的出现,所有这些都激发了活跃的女权主义词汇和思维模式这种灵活性、多功能性和适应性使女权主义在不同的时代和地点与广泛的受众相关,证明了该运动的活力。然而,学术女权主义者在很大程度上忽视了将人类尊严作为核心组织价值的研究。这是反常的。在全球范围内,人的尊严,即人类本身固有的价值,日益被视为人权的基础。联合国于1948年12月10日宣布,人的尊严是普遍的基本人权的基础几十年来,人的尊严滋养了当代人道主义,并成为国际人权话语的基础和框架,成为多个宪法和条约的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A dignitarian feminist jurisprudence with applications to rape, sexual harassment and honor codes
Feminist insights, ideas, initiatives and agendas are not – and should not be – confined to a single, specific value system. Because they are amenable to various theories and ideologies, they may benefit from multiple worldviews and terminologies. Since its modern beginnings in the nineteenth century, feminism has mastered diverse value-languages, each relevant to a particular context. Within the framework of classical liberalism and the assertion of equal rationality and thus autonomy and civil liberties, liberal feminism claimed that all women were equally rational, autonomous and deserving of civil liberties.1 As sensitivity to dominance and the oppression of subjugated classes by hegemonic groups grew, radical feminism set out to eradicate suppressive hegemonic patriarchalism and liberate dominated women as a class.2 With the proud proclamation of minority distinctiveness, relational feminists began demanding that women be acknowledged and celebrated for their nurturing and caring constitution.3 The development of identity politics led to the emergence of black, lesbian, religious and numerous other feminisms, intersectionality, postmodernism, post-colonialism and neoconservatism, all inspiring lively feminist vocabularies and patterns of thought.4 This flexibility, versatility and adaptability has allowed feminism to become relevant to a wide range of audiences across diverse times and places, attesting to the movement’s vitality. And yet, academic feminists have largely neglected the study of human dignity as a central organizing value. This is anomalous. Across the globe, human dignity, the inherent value of humanity per se, is increasingly regarded as the basis of human rights. The United Nations declared, on 10 December 1948, that human dignity is the foundation of universal, fundamental human rights.5 Nourishing contemporary humanism and underlying and framing international human rights discourse, human dignity has, over the decades since, formed the basis of multiple constitutions and treaties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
International law and feminism Catharine A. MacKinnon and equality theory Sex equality, gender injury, Title IX and women’s education Sexual harassment law: an evolution in theory, scope and impact A dignitarian feminist jurisprudence with applications to rape, sexual harassment and honor codes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1