安全港与中国海上保险公司的连带责任——美国、澳大利亚与中国的比较研究

Chinese Law eJournal Pub Date : 2009-03-12 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.1358467

Lin Xie

{"title":"安全港与中国海上保险公司的连带责任——美国、澳大利亚与中国的比较研究","authors":"Lin Xie","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1358467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is to clarify the current liability of Online Service Providers (OSPs) in China and argue that a better legal frame work should be introduced in the future. Comparing the situations in the US and Australia, this paper will explore how traditional liabilities in China, the safe harbor provisions and aid and abetment standards are applied in the recent OSPs cases.","PeriodicalId":356075,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Law eJournal","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safe Harbors and Joint Liability of the OSPs in China - A Comparative Study between the US and Australia and China\",\"authors\":\"Lin Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1358467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article is to clarify the current liability of Online Service Providers (OSPs) in China and argue that a better legal frame work should be introduced in the future. Comparing the situations in the US and Australia, this paper will explore how traditional liabilities in China, the safe harbor provisions and aid and abetment standards are applied in the recent OSPs cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1358467\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1358467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在澄清目前中国网络服务提供商(osp)的责任，并认为未来应该引入更好的法律框架。本文将比较美国和澳大利亚的情况，探讨中国的传统责任、安全港条款和援助教唆标准如何应用于最近的osp案件。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Safe Harbors and Joint Liability of the OSPs in China - A Comparative Study between the US and Australia and China

This article is to clarify the current liability of Online Service Providers (OSPs) in China and argue that a better legal frame work should be introduced in the future. Comparing the situations in the US and Australia, this paper will explore how traditional liabilities in China, the safe harbor provisions and aid and abetment standards are applied in the recent OSPs cases.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Chinese Law eJournal

自引率

0.00%

发文量