英语教师自编试题分析

Rice Pesiwarissa, Karolis Anaktototy, Hendrik Jacob Maruanaya
{"title":"英语教师自编试题分析","authors":"Rice Pesiwarissa, Karolis Anaktototy, Hendrik Jacob Maruanaya","doi":"10.30598/matail.v2i1.5485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teacher-made tests became a common practice in school to assess the students’ mastery of the content knowledge and skills.  In the development of the test, multiple-choice test form is frequently a preferred option among the teacher. This study examines the content knowledge, cognitive and authentic evidence of teacher-made multiple-choice tests in EFL learning context in Junior High school. The English midterm-test document for grade 7 as the source of data. The test consists of 25 multiple choice items. The analysis showed that test items functioned primarily at the content knowledge of linguistic competence (52%), discourse competence (24%), and interactional competence (24%). The cognitive functioning level is C1 (4%), C2 (32%), C3 (32%) and C4 (32%), while the authentic functioning level is 16%. However, there are 84% items that are considered less authentic with the result of the analysis showing the mean score of the raters is 2.69. Regarding the findings of this study, the teacher needs to develop the authentic tasks in the test.","PeriodicalId":149617,"journal":{"name":"MATAI: International Journal of Language Education","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Analysis of EFL Teacher-Made Tests\",\"authors\":\"Rice Pesiwarissa, Karolis Anaktototy, Hendrik Jacob Maruanaya\",\"doi\":\"10.30598/matail.v2i1.5485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Teacher-made tests became a common practice in school to assess the students’ mastery of the content knowledge and skills.  In the development of the test, multiple-choice test form is frequently a preferred option among the teacher. This study examines the content knowledge, cognitive and authentic evidence of teacher-made multiple-choice tests in EFL learning context in Junior High school. The English midterm-test document for grade 7 as the source of data. The test consists of 25 multiple choice items. The analysis showed that test items functioned primarily at the content knowledge of linguistic competence (52%), discourse competence (24%), and interactional competence (24%). The cognitive functioning level is C1 (4%), C2 (32%), C3 (32%) and C4 (32%), while the authentic functioning level is 16%. However, there are 84% items that are considered less authentic with the result of the analysis showing the mean score of the raters is 2.69. Regarding the findings of this study, the teacher needs to develop the authentic tasks in the test.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MATAI: International Journal of Language Education\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MATAI: International Journal of Language Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30598/matail.v2i1.5485\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MATAI: International Journal of Language Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30598/matail.v2i1.5485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教师自编考试成为学校评估学生对内容、知识和技能掌握程度的普遍做法。在测试的发展过程中,选择题的形式往往是教师的首选。本研究考察了初中英语教学情境下教师选择题的内容、知识、认知和真实证据。七年级英语期中考试卷作为数据来源。测试包括25个选择题。分析表明,测试项目主要在语言能力的内容知识(52%)、话语能力(24%)和互动能力(24%)上发挥作用。认知功能水平为C1(4%)、C2(32%)、C3(32%)、C4(32%),真实功能水平为16%。然而,有84%的项目被认为不太真实,分析结果显示评分者的平均得分为2.69。根据本研究的发现,教师需要开发测试中的真实任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Analysis of EFL Teacher-Made Tests
Teacher-made tests became a common practice in school to assess the students’ mastery of the content knowledge and skills.  In the development of the test, multiple-choice test form is frequently a preferred option among the teacher. This study examines the content knowledge, cognitive and authentic evidence of teacher-made multiple-choice tests in EFL learning context in Junior High school. The English midterm-test document for grade 7 as the source of data. The test consists of 25 multiple choice items. The analysis showed that test items functioned primarily at the content knowledge of linguistic competence (52%), discourse competence (24%), and interactional competence (24%). The cognitive functioning level is C1 (4%), C2 (32%), C3 (32%) and C4 (32%), while the authentic functioning level is 16%. However, there are 84% items that are considered less authentic with the result of the analysis showing the mean score of the raters is 2.69. Regarding the findings of this study, the teacher needs to develop the authentic tasks in the test.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Writing Summary as An Alternative Strategy To Comprehend The Text Students' Perception of Using Google Meet In English For Advertising Class at Universitas Bhinneka PGRI A Pragmatic Analysis of Deixis and Reference on Kim Hanbin Songs An Analysis of Figurative Language in Poems by Laksmi Pamuntjak The Importance of Teaching Listening Strategies in English Language Context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1