“单打独斗”的可行性:旅美越南人与跨国社区的联合经验

Christian Collet
{"title":"“单打独斗”的可行性:旅美越南人与跨国社区的联合经验","authors":"Christian Collet","doi":"10.2979/RAC.2008.1.2.279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the classic dilemmas facing marginalized populations is whether or not to engage in a coalition to gain access to political power. After three decades as one of America's newest and poorest immigrant groups, Vietnamese in the United States have begun to grapple with this idea, in recent years attempting coalitions with whites, othe Asian ethnic groups, and Latinos as their population has grown. For the most part, such efforts have been either ad hoc or ineffectual; the success they have found has been largely through a \"go it alone\" (GIA) electoral strategy relying heavily on diasporic fundraising networks, ethnic media, careful cross-racial campaign appeals, and mobilization around transnational interests-namely, opposition to Vietnam's communist government. Both their progress and wariness about the coalition experience recalls Carmichael and Hamilton's classic treatise that, four decades after its publication, continues to offer a useful starting point for thinking about how emergent groups can pursue power in urban communities.As they make gains in the electoral realm, Vietnamese Americans face several challenges that may impede their transition from descriptive representation to full incorporation. Among these are the maintenance of internal cohesion and the increased likelihood of competition with Latinos, with whom Vietnamese Americans share urban space. The last challenge speaks to the long-term effects of transnationlism-whether the pace of current reforms in Vietnam and increased bilateral relations with the United States will ultimaltely undermine the community's anticommunist cause. Using survey, aggregate, and ethnographic data from three California cities-Westminster, Garden Grove, and San Jose-this paper asks if the GIA approach is a necessary first step for new groups to gain political footing and considers its long-term consequences. Drawing from the Vietnamese experience in American politics, I discuss the broader significance of racial, ethnic, and migrant coalition politics in a global perspective.","PeriodicalId":297214,"journal":{"name":"Race/Ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global Contexts","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Viability of \\\"Going it Alone\\\": Vietnamese in America and the Coalition Experience of a Transnational Community\",\"authors\":\"Christian Collet\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/RAC.2008.1.2.279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the classic dilemmas facing marginalized populations is whether or not to engage in a coalition to gain access to political power. After three decades as one of America's newest and poorest immigrant groups, Vietnamese in the United States have begun to grapple with this idea, in recent years attempting coalitions with whites, othe Asian ethnic groups, and Latinos as their population has grown. For the most part, such efforts have been either ad hoc or ineffectual; the success they have found has been largely through a \\\"go it alone\\\" (GIA) electoral strategy relying heavily on diasporic fundraising networks, ethnic media, careful cross-racial campaign appeals, and mobilization around transnational interests-namely, opposition to Vietnam's communist government. Both their progress and wariness about the coalition experience recalls Carmichael and Hamilton's classic treatise that, four decades after its publication, continues to offer a useful starting point for thinking about how emergent groups can pursue power in urban communities.As they make gains in the electoral realm, Vietnamese Americans face several challenges that may impede their transition from descriptive representation to full incorporation. Among these are the maintenance of internal cohesion and the increased likelihood of competition with Latinos, with whom Vietnamese Americans share urban space. The last challenge speaks to the long-term effects of transnationlism-whether the pace of current reforms in Vietnam and increased bilateral relations with the United States will ultimaltely undermine the community's anticommunist cause. Using survey, aggregate, and ethnographic data from three California cities-Westminster, Garden Grove, and San Jose-this paper asks if the GIA approach is a necessary first step for new groups to gain political footing and considers its long-term consequences. Drawing from the Vietnamese experience in American politics, I discuss the broader significance of racial, ethnic, and migrant coalition politics in a global perspective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":297214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Race/Ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global Contexts\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Race/Ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global Contexts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/RAC.2008.1.2.279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Race/Ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global Contexts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/RAC.2008.1.2.279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

边缘化人群面临的一个经典困境是,是否要加入一个联盟,以获得政治权力。作为美国最新和最贫穷的移民群体之一,三十年来,在美国的越南人已经开始努力应对这种想法,近年来,随着人口的增长,他们试图与白人、其他亚洲族裔和拉美裔结成联盟。在大多数情况下,这些努力要么是临时的,要么是无效的;他们的成功在很大程度上是通过一种“单干”(GIA)的选举策略取得的,这种策略严重依赖于离散的筹款网络、少数民族媒体、谨慎的跨种族竞选呼吁,以及围绕跨国利益(即反对越南共产党政府)的动员。他们的进步和对联盟经验的谨慎都让人想起卡迈克尔和汉密尔顿的经典论文,在其出版40年后,仍然为思考新兴群体如何在城市社区中追求权力提供了一个有用的起点。随着越南裔美国人在选举领域取得进展,他们面临着一些挑战,这些挑战可能会阻碍他们从描述性代表向完全融入社会的转变。其中包括维持内部凝聚力,以及与拉丁美洲人竞争的可能性增加,因为越南裔美国人与拉丁美洲人共享城市空间。最后一个挑战涉及到跨国主义的长期影响——当前越南改革的步伐以及与美国双边关系的加强是否最终会破坏越南社会的反共事业。本文利用来自加州三个城市(威斯敏斯特、加登格罗夫和圣何塞)的调查、汇总和人种学数据,询问GIA方法是否是新群体获得政治立足点的必要第一步,并考虑其长期后果。根据越南在美国政治中的经验,我讨论了种族、民族和移民联盟政治在全球视野中的更广泛意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Viability of "Going it Alone": Vietnamese in America and the Coalition Experience of a Transnational Community
One of the classic dilemmas facing marginalized populations is whether or not to engage in a coalition to gain access to political power. After three decades as one of America's newest and poorest immigrant groups, Vietnamese in the United States have begun to grapple with this idea, in recent years attempting coalitions with whites, othe Asian ethnic groups, and Latinos as their population has grown. For the most part, such efforts have been either ad hoc or ineffectual; the success they have found has been largely through a "go it alone" (GIA) electoral strategy relying heavily on diasporic fundraising networks, ethnic media, careful cross-racial campaign appeals, and mobilization around transnational interests-namely, opposition to Vietnam's communist government. Both their progress and wariness about the coalition experience recalls Carmichael and Hamilton's classic treatise that, four decades after its publication, continues to offer a useful starting point for thinking about how emergent groups can pursue power in urban communities.As they make gains in the electoral realm, Vietnamese Americans face several challenges that may impede their transition from descriptive representation to full incorporation. Among these are the maintenance of internal cohesion and the increased likelihood of competition with Latinos, with whom Vietnamese Americans share urban space. The last challenge speaks to the long-term effects of transnationlism-whether the pace of current reforms in Vietnam and increased bilateral relations with the United States will ultimaltely undermine the community's anticommunist cause. Using survey, aggregate, and ethnographic data from three California cities-Westminster, Garden Grove, and San Jose-this paper asks if the GIA approach is a necessary first step for new groups to gain political footing and considers its long-term consequences. Drawing from the Vietnamese experience in American politics, I discuss the broader significance of racial, ethnic, and migrant coalition politics in a global perspective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reform or Transformation?: The Pivotal Role of Food Justice in the U.S. Food Movement Mohamed Sheikh Osman’s Story White Man’s “Burden” and the New Colonialism in West African Cocoa Production Race and Ethnicity from the Point of View of Farm Workers in the Food System Sisters of the Soil: Urban Gardening as Resistance in Detroit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1