了解干预对计算机科学学生在线论坛行为的影响

D. Vista, Nickolas J. G. Falkner, Claudia Szabo
{"title":"了解干预对计算机科学学生在线论坛行为的影响","authors":"D. Vista, Nickolas J. G. Falkner, Claudia Szabo","doi":"10.1145/3059009.3059053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A key challenge for educators using online discussion forums is how to provide effective feedback and support to students, to ensure they are engaged with discussions on the forums, and do not disengage from the course. In addition, there is a significant problem of scale to address. Even relatively low population forums of less than a hundred students can generate thousands of posts, so it is infeasible for the lecturer to monitor every discussion to identify disengaging students. There is a need to understand the act of intervention, in order to provide automated tools to better assist teaching staff with this task. Measuring the impact of intervention can be challenging and requires us to, first, understand what ``standard'' behaviour looks like across different student groups and identify topics where intervention would be most effective. In this paper, we identify the impact of intervention on different groups of students, characterising their behaviour in terms of response time and activity, compare the different responses to programming-related questions and other questions, and identify the useful aspects of this study for computer science educators. We conduct an initial examination of the impact of the nature of the question on intervention effectiveness and propose an analysis method that can be applied to any computer science forum. we showcase the application of the method to three courses. Our results indicate that associating student activity with the number of forum posts is misleading, as students who are only reading the forums respond also to intervention.","PeriodicalId":174429,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the Effects of Intervention on Computer Science Student Behaviour in On-line Forums\",\"authors\":\"D. Vista, Nickolas J. G. Falkner, Claudia Szabo\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3059009.3059053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A key challenge for educators using online discussion forums is how to provide effective feedback and support to students, to ensure they are engaged with discussions on the forums, and do not disengage from the course. In addition, there is a significant problem of scale to address. Even relatively low population forums of less than a hundred students can generate thousands of posts, so it is infeasible for the lecturer to monitor every discussion to identify disengaging students. There is a need to understand the act of intervention, in order to provide automated tools to better assist teaching staff with this task. Measuring the impact of intervention can be challenging and requires us to, first, understand what ``standard'' behaviour looks like across different student groups and identify topics where intervention would be most effective. In this paper, we identify the impact of intervention on different groups of students, characterising their behaviour in terms of response time and activity, compare the different responses to programming-related questions and other questions, and identify the useful aspects of this study for computer science educators. We conduct an initial examination of the impact of the nature of the question on intervention effectiveness and propose an analysis method that can be applied to any computer science forum. we showcase the application of the method to three courses. Our results indicate that associating student activity with the number of forum posts is misleading, as students who are only reading the forums respond also to intervention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":174429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3059009.3059053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3059009.3059053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

使用在线讨论论坛的教育工作者面临的一个关键挑战是如何为学生提供有效的反馈和支持,以确保他们参与论坛上的讨论,而不会脱离课程。此外,还有一个重大的规模问题需要解决。即使是人数相对较少的论坛,只有不到100名学生,也可能产生数千个帖子,因此讲师不可能监控每一次讨论,以识别脱离参与的学生。有必要了解干预的行为,以便提供自动化工具来更好地协助教学人员完成这项任务。衡量干预的影响可能具有挑战性,这需要我们首先了解不同学生群体的“标准”行为是什么样子,并确定干预最有效的主题。在本文中,我们确定了干预对不同学生群体的影响,从反应时间和活动方面描述了他们的行为特征,比较了对编程相关问题和其他问题的不同反应,并确定了本研究对计算机科学教育者的有用方面。我们对问题的性质对干预有效性的影响进行了初步检查,并提出了一种可以应用于任何计算机科学论坛的分析方法。我们展示了该方法在三门课程中的应用。我们的研究结果表明,将学生活动与论坛帖子的数量联系起来是有误导性的,因为只阅读论坛的学生也会对干预做出反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding the Effects of Intervention on Computer Science Student Behaviour in On-line Forums
A key challenge for educators using online discussion forums is how to provide effective feedback and support to students, to ensure they are engaged with discussions on the forums, and do not disengage from the course. In addition, there is a significant problem of scale to address. Even relatively low population forums of less than a hundred students can generate thousands of posts, so it is infeasible for the lecturer to monitor every discussion to identify disengaging students. There is a need to understand the act of intervention, in order to provide automated tools to better assist teaching staff with this task. Measuring the impact of intervention can be challenging and requires us to, first, understand what ``standard'' behaviour looks like across different student groups and identify topics where intervention would be most effective. In this paper, we identify the impact of intervention on different groups of students, characterising their behaviour in terms of response time and activity, compare the different responses to programming-related questions and other questions, and identify the useful aspects of this study for computer science educators. We conduct an initial examination of the impact of the nature of the question on intervention effectiveness and propose an analysis method that can be applied to any computer science forum. we showcase the application of the method to three courses. Our results indicate that associating student activity with the number of forum posts is misleading, as students who are only reading the forums respond also to intervention.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cross Cultural Project Based Learning & Soft Skills Practice Self-Assess Competency as Yes/No: A Preliminary Study Teaching Operating Systems Concepts with SystemTap Tasks for Assessing Skills of Computational Thinking The Solothurn Project: Bringing Computer Science Education to Primary Schools in Switzerland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1