自举正态分布和二项分布

A. C. Kelechi
{"title":"自举正态分布和二项分布","authors":"A. C. Kelechi","doi":"10.12691/IJEFM-2-6-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines and compares the implications of bootstrapping normal and binomial distributions. Hypothetical data set was used aided by S-plus package. Data analysis, examination, and comparison were based on their correlation coefficients and the bootstrap estimate of the standard error of plug-in correlation coefficient. Evidence shows that both distributions behave very well as seen in the fundamental theory of statistics. Also as the bootstrap level increases, the binomial gives a lower correlation coefficient (-0.07258132), against -0.1355295 in normal distribution. It is pertinent to note that the correlation coefficient is steady as the bootstrap increases.The paper therefore focuses on the performance of the standard error of plug-in correlation coefficient. Result shows that the normal distribution gives lower standard error which suggests more reliability to the plug-in estimate. Thus, this study uses the bootstrap method to demonstrate a scenario where the normality assumption becomes stronger as the bootstrap sample sizes (100, 500, and 1000) gets larger but on approximation at two decimal places, both distributions give the same statistical inference (1000: 0.14). Therefore, binomial distribution is preferred to normal distribution in terms of their correlation coefficient but the normal distribution is preferred to binomial for carrying out further analysis in parameter estimation and other statistical inference in terms of their standard error of plug-in correlation coefficient.","PeriodicalId":298738,"journal":{"name":"international journal of research in computer application & management","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bootstrapping Normal and Binomial Distributions\",\"authors\":\"A. C. Kelechi\",\"doi\":\"10.12691/IJEFM-2-6-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines and compares the implications of bootstrapping normal and binomial distributions. Hypothetical data set was used aided by S-plus package. Data analysis, examination, and comparison were based on their correlation coefficients and the bootstrap estimate of the standard error of plug-in correlation coefficient. Evidence shows that both distributions behave very well as seen in the fundamental theory of statistics. Also as the bootstrap level increases, the binomial gives a lower correlation coefficient (-0.07258132), against -0.1355295 in normal distribution. It is pertinent to note that the correlation coefficient is steady as the bootstrap increases.The paper therefore focuses on the performance of the standard error of plug-in correlation coefficient. Result shows that the normal distribution gives lower standard error which suggests more reliability to the plug-in estimate. Thus, this study uses the bootstrap method to demonstrate a scenario where the normality assumption becomes stronger as the bootstrap sample sizes (100, 500, and 1000) gets larger but on approximation at two decimal places, both distributions give the same statistical inference (1000: 0.14). Therefore, binomial distribution is preferred to normal distribution in terms of their correlation coefficient but the normal distribution is preferred to binomial for carrying out further analysis in parameter estimation and other statistical inference in terms of their standard error of plug-in correlation coefficient.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298738,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"international journal of research in computer application & management\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"international journal of research in computer application & management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12691/IJEFM-2-6-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"international journal of research in computer application & management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12691/IJEFM-2-6-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文研究并比较了自举正态分布和二项分布的含义。假设数据集使用S-plus软件包辅助。数据分析、检验和比较是基于它们的相关系数和插件相关系数标准误差的自举估计。有证据表明,这两种分布都表现得很好,就像统计学基础理论中看到的那样。此外,随着自举水平的增加,二项分布给出了较低的相关系数(-0.07258132),而正态分布为-0.1355295。值得注意的是,相关系数随着自举的增加是稳定的。因此,本文重点研究了插件相关系数标准误差的性能。结果表明,正态分布给出的标准误差较小,说明插件估计具有较高的可靠性。因此,本研究使用bootstrap方法来演示一个场景,其中正态性假设随着bootstrap样本大小(100,500和1000)变得更大而变得更强,但在小数点后两位的近似值上,两个分布给出了相同的统计推断(1000:0.14)。因此,二项分布的相关系数优于正态分布,但在参数估计和其他统计推断中,正态分布的插件相关系数的标准误差优于二项分布进行进一步分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bootstrapping Normal and Binomial Distributions
This paper examines and compares the implications of bootstrapping normal and binomial distributions. Hypothetical data set was used aided by S-plus package. Data analysis, examination, and comparison were based on their correlation coefficients and the bootstrap estimate of the standard error of plug-in correlation coefficient. Evidence shows that both distributions behave very well as seen in the fundamental theory of statistics. Also as the bootstrap level increases, the binomial gives a lower correlation coefficient (-0.07258132), against -0.1355295 in normal distribution. It is pertinent to note that the correlation coefficient is steady as the bootstrap increases.The paper therefore focuses on the performance of the standard error of plug-in correlation coefficient. Result shows that the normal distribution gives lower standard error which suggests more reliability to the plug-in estimate. Thus, this study uses the bootstrap method to demonstrate a scenario where the normality assumption becomes stronger as the bootstrap sample sizes (100, 500, and 1000) gets larger but on approximation at two decimal places, both distributions give the same statistical inference (1000: 0.14). Therefore, binomial distribution is preferred to normal distribution in terms of their correlation coefficient but the normal distribution is preferred to binomial for carrying out further analysis in parameter estimation and other statistical inference in terms of their standard error of plug-in correlation coefficient.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Nexus between Buyback, Business Cycle, and Stock Market Volatility Cascade Artificial Neural Networks for Modeling Economic Performance: A New Perspective Measuring the Efficiency of Hospital’s Cardiology Wards Using the Free Disposal Hull Approach World Oil Fluctuation and Vietnamese Stock Market Index Political Risk Factors on Perfomance of Public Private Partnership Renewable Energy Projects: The Case of Geothermal Renewable Enrgy Projects in Kenya
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1