基于专家深度访谈研究的竞争情报实证结构验证

Luis Madureira, Aleš Popovič, M. Castelli
{"title":"基于专家深度访谈研究的竞争情报实证结构验证","authors":"Luis Madureira, Aleš Popovič, M. Castelli","doi":"10.1109/ICTMOD52902.2021.9739422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For a discipline to prosper in business and science, it must be thoroughly defined, characterized, and measured. Notably, the definition must reflect its praxis. This study aims to fill this void by empirically validating the Competitive Intelligence unified view and modular definition proposed by Madureira, Popovic, and Castelli (2021). The choice for this specific definition relies on its recency, comprehensiveness, completeness, and universality. The study uses a mixed-methods approach to derive meta-inferences from the sequential integration of qualitative and quantitative methods. We tested content, external, discriminant validities, reliability, and applicability using an in-depth interview study with twenty global CI subject matter experts. The results empirically validate the unified view, the modular definition, the five core defining dimensions, and their respective descriptors. This study unfolds the impact of CI in management research across five key areas - practical, theoretical, educational, society, policy. The critical lever for this impact is the effectuation of the Body of Knowledge which subsequently effectuates the CI practice, education, and discipline, serving as the foundation for its future development in business and academia.","PeriodicalId":154817,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions (ICTMOD)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competitive Intelligence Empirical Construct Validation Using Expert In-Depth Interviews Study\",\"authors\":\"Luis Madureira, Aleš Popovič, M. Castelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICTMOD52902.2021.9739422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For a discipline to prosper in business and science, it must be thoroughly defined, characterized, and measured. Notably, the definition must reflect its praxis. This study aims to fill this void by empirically validating the Competitive Intelligence unified view and modular definition proposed by Madureira, Popovic, and Castelli (2021). The choice for this specific definition relies on its recency, comprehensiveness, completeness, and universality. The study uses a mixed-methods approach to derive meta-inferences from the sequential integration of qualitative and quantitative methods. We tested content, external, discriminant validities, reliability, and applicability using an in-depth interview study with twenty global CI subject matter experts. The results empirically validate the unified view, the modular definition, the five core defining dimensions, and their respective descriptors. This study unfolds the impact of CI in management research across five key areas - practical, theoretical, educational, society, policy. The critical lever for this impact is the effectuation of the Body of Knowledge which subsequently effectuates the CI practice, education, and discipline, serving as the foundation for its future development in business and academia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":154817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions (ICTMOD)\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions (ICTMOD)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTMOD52902.2021.9739422\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions (ICTMOD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTMOD52902.2021.9739422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

一门学科要想在商业和科学领域取得成功,就必须对其进行彻底的定义、定性和衡量。值得注意的是,定义必须反映其实践。本研究旨在通过实证验证Madureira、Popovic和Castelli(2021)提出的竞争情报统一观和模块化定义来填补这一空白。这个特定定义的选择取决于它的近代性、全面性、完整性和普遍性。该研究采用混合方法的方法,从定性和定量方法的顺序整合中得出元推论。我们通过与20位全球CI主题专家的深度访谈研究,测试了内容、外部、判别效度、可靠性和适用性。结果经验验证了统一视图、模块化定义、五个核心定义维度以及它们各自的描述符。本研究从实践、理论、教育、社会、政策五个关键领域展开了CI在管理研究中的影响。这种影响的关键杠杆是知识体系的实施,它随后影响了CI实践、教育和学科,并作为其在商业和学术界未来发展的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Competitive Intelligence Empirical Construct Validation Using Expert In-Depth Interviews Study
For a discipline to prosper in business and science, it must be thoroughly defined, characterized, and measured. Notably, the definition must reflect its praxis. This study aims to fill this void by empirically validating the Competitive Intelligence unified view and modular definition proposed by Madureira, Popovic, and Castelli (2021). The choice for this specific definition relies on its recency, comprehensiveness, completeness, and universality. The study uses a mixed-methods approach to derive meta-inferences from the sequential integration of qualitative and quantitative methods. We tested content, external, discriminant validities, reliability, and applicability using an in-depth interview study with twenty global CI subject matter experts. The results empirically validate the unified view, the modular definition, the five core defining dimensions, and their respective descriptors. This study unfolds the impact of CI in management research across five key areas - practical, theoretical, educational, society, policy. The critical lever for this impact is the effectuation of the Body of Knowledge which subsequently effectuates the CI practice, education, and discipline, serving as the foundation for its future development in business and academia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Linking Technology Management Capabilities Perspective with the Management of Technology Platforms: a literature review and preliminary framework Prediction of perishable goods deliveries by GRU neural networks for reduction of logistics costs Which online channel approach suits best for brands' strategies? An affordance perspective CSR Strategies, Investment Efficiency and Sustainable Growth Current Research Landscape of Machine Learning Algorithms in Online Identity Fraud Prediction and Detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1