公众生活

Ingo Elbe, Sven Ellmers
{"title":"公众生活","authors":"Ingo Elbe, Sven Ellmers","doi":"10.1515/zksp-2015-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to Hannah Arendt, the processes of acceleration and growth of modern economy result from the fact that the once concealed reproduction of human life has become a matter of public interest. Ever since, the biological metabolism of mankind and the labour required to sustain it are colonizing all other relations to the world. The following article calls these fundamental assumptions into question. It seeks to show i) that Arendt’s basic notions, such as ‘labour’ and ‘producing’, remain wholly ambiguous, ii) that she overgeneralizes certain social and economic tendencies of her time, and iii) that the biological metabolism offers no satisfactory explanation for the self-referential economic growth she describes. *Kontaktpersonen: Ingo Elbe, Privatdozent undWissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter am Institut für Philosophie der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, E ˗ Mail: ingo.elbe@uni-oldenburg.de Sven Ellmers,Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter am Institut für Philosophie der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, E ˗ Mail: sven.ellmers@uni-oldenburg.de Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie 2015; 2(2): 371–400","PeriodicalId":250691,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie","volume":"202 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Das öffentliche Leben\",\"authors\":\"Ingo Elbe, Sven Ellmers\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/zksp-2015-0017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to Hannah Arendt, the processes of acceleration and growth of modern economy result from the fact that the once concealed reproduction of human life has become a matter of public interest. Ever since, the biological metabolism of mankind and the labour required to sustain it are colonizing all other relations to the world. The following article calls these fundamental assumptions into question. It seeks to show i) that Arendt’s basic notions, such as ‘labour’ and ‘producing’, remain wholly ambiguous, ii) that she overgeneralizes certain social and economic tendencies of her time, and iii) that the biological metabolism offers no satisfactory explanation for the self-referential economic growth she describes. *Kontaktpersonen: Ingo Elbe, Privatdozent undWissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter am Institut für Philosophie der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, E ˗ Mail: ingo.elbe@uni-oldenburg.de Sven Ellmers,Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter am Institut für Philosophie der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, E ˗ Mail: sven.ellmers@uni-oldenburg.de Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie 2015; 2(2): 371–400\",\"PeriodicalId\":250691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie\",\"volume\":\"202 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/zksp-2015-0017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zksp-2015-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在汉娜·阿伦特看来,现代经济的加速和增长的过程,是由于人类生命的再生产曾经被隐藏起来,现在已经成为公共利益的问题。从那时起,人类的生物新陈代谢和维持新陈代谢所需的劳动就影响着与世界的所有其他关系。下面的文章对这些基本假设提出了质疑。它试图表明i)阿伦特的基本概念,如“劳动”和“生产”,仍然完全模棱两可,ii)她过度概括了她那个时代的某些社会和经济趋势,iii)生物代谢对她所描述的自我参照的经济增长没有提供令人满意的解释。*联系人:Ingo Elbe, Privatdozent undWissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter am Institut f r Philosophie der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, email: ingo.elbe@uni-oldenburg.de Sven Ellmers,Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter am Institut fcarl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, e-mail: sven.ellmers@uni-oldenburg.de Zeitschrift fr kritische Sozialtheorie und philosophy 2015;2 (2): 371 - 400
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Das öffentliche Leben
According to Hannah Arendt, the processes of acceleration and growth of modern economy result from the fact that the once concealed reproduction of human life has become a matter of public interest. Ever since, the biological metabolism of mankind and the labour required to sustain it are colonizing all other relations to the world. The following article calls these fundamental assumptions into question. It seeks to show i) that Arendt’s basic notions, such as ‘labour’ and ‘producing’, remain wholly ambiguous, ii) that she overgeneralizes certain social and economic tendencies of her time, and iii) that the biological metabolism offers no satisfactory explanation for the self-referential economic growth she describes. *Kontaktpersonen: Ingo Elbe, Privatdozent undWissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter am Institut für Philosophie der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, E ˗ Mail: ingo.elbe@uni-oldenburg.de Sven Ellmers,Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter am Institut für Philosophie der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, E ˗ Mail: sven.ellmers@uni-oldenburg.de Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie 2015; 2(2): 371–400
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Die Destruktion der Gesellschaftstheorie: Ernesto Laclaus und Chantal Mouffes Versuch einer nicht-essentialistischen Politischen Philosophie Ohne Form kein Inhalt Politics contra the functionalisation of man – Hannah Arendt’s problematic investigation of ideology and labour Between conflict and consensus: Why democracy needs conflicts and why communities should delimit their intensity Die „letzte Sinnlosigkeit“
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1