{"title":"心律失常分类数据属性约简的比较研究","authors":"A. G. Persada, N. A. Setiawan, H. A. Nugroho","doi":"10.1109/ICITEED.2013.6676213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research presented in this paper is focused on comparative study of various attribute selections as one of preprocessing methods used in world machine learning applications. Using UCI arrhythmia dataset, nine combination of attribute selection, based on search methods (Best First, Genetic Search and PSO Search) and attribute evaluator (CfsSubsetEval, ConsistencySubsetEval, and RSARSubsetEval) are tested and compared. Those data of attribute reduction results are then classified by using eight classifiers (Naive Bayes, Bayes Net, MLP Classifier, RBF Classifier, Jrip, PART, J48 and Random Forest). The best overall results are achieved by the combination of Best First and CsfSubsetEval which has the accuracy of 81% when it is tested with RBF Classifier. PSO Search methods was also found not very effective to generate high quality subsets.","PeriodicalId":204082,"journal":{"name":"2013 International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of attribute reduction on arrhythmia classification dataset\",\"authors\":\"A. G. Persada, N. A. Setiawan, H. A. Nugroho\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICITEED.2013.6676213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The research presented in this paper is focused on comparative study of various attribute selections as one of preprocessing methods used in world machine learning applications. Using UCI arrhythmia dataset, nine combination of attribute selection, based on search methods (Best First, Genetic Search and PSO Search) and attribute evaluator (CfsSubsetEval, ConsistencySubsetEval, and RSARSubsetEval) are tested and compared. Those data of attribute reduction results are then classified by using eight classifiers (Naive Bayes, Bayes Net, MLP Classifier, RBF Classifier, Jrip, PART, J48 and Random Forest). The best overall results are achieved by the combination of Best First and CsfSubsetEval which has the accuracy of 81% when it is tested with RBF Classifier. PSO Search methods was also found not very effective to generate high quality subsets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":204082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE)\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITEED.2013.6676213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITEED.2013.6676213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative study of attribute reduction on arrhythmia classification dataset
The research presented in this paper is focused on comparative study of various attribute selections as one of preprocessing methods used in world machine learning applications. Using UCI arrhythmia dataset, nine combination of attribute selection, based on search methods (Best First, Genetic Search and PSO Search) and attribute evaluator (CfsSubsetEval, ConsistencySubsetEval, and RSARSubsetEval) are tested and compared. Those data of attribute reduction results are then classified by using eight classifiers (Naive Bayes, Bayes Net, MLP Classifier, RBF Classifier, Jrip, PART, J48 and Random Forest). The best overall results are achieved by the combination of Best First and CsfSubsetEval which has the accuracy of 81% when it is tested with RBF Classifier. PSO Search methods was also found not very effective to generate high quality subsets.