透明度和信任对在线评论自动审核系统接受度的影响

Jens Brunk, J. Mattern, Dennis M. Riehle
{"title":"透明度和信任对在线评论自动审核系统接受度的影响","authors":"Jens Brunk, J. Mattern, Dennis M. Riehle","doi":"10.1109/CBI.2019.00056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"User-generated online comments and posts increasingly contain abusive content that needs moderation from an ethical but also legislative perspective. The amount of comments and the need for moderation in our digital world often overpower the capacity of manual moderation. To remedy this, platforms often adopt semi-automated moderation systems. However, because such systems are typically black boxes, user trust in and acceptance of the system is not easily achieved, as black box systems can be perceived as nontransparent and moderating user comments is easily associated with censorship. Therefore, we investigate the relationship of system transparency through explanations, user trust and system acceptance with an online experiment. Our results show that the transparency of an automatic online comment moderation system is a prerequisite for user trust in the system. However, the objective transparency of the moderation system does not influence the user's acceptance.","PeriodicalId":193238,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 21st Conference on Business Informatics (CBI)","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Transparency and Trust on Acceptance of Automatic Online Comment Moderation Systems\",\"authors\":\"Jens Brunk, J. Mattern, Dennis M. Riehle\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CBI.2019.00056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"User-generated online comments and posts increasingly contain abusive content that needs moderation from an ethical but also legislative perspective. The amount of comments and the need for moderation in our digital world often overpower the capacity of manual moderation. To remedy this, platforms often adopt semi-automated moderation systems. However, because such systems are typically black boxes, user trust in and acceptance of the system is not easily achieved, as black box systems can be perceived as nontransparent and moderating user comments is easily associated with censorship. Therefore, we investigate the relationship of system transparency through explanations, user trust and system acceptance with an online experiment. Our results show that the transparency of an automatic online comment moderation system is a prerequisite for user trust in the system. However, the objective transparency of the moderation system does not influence the user's acceptance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE 21st Conference on Business Informatics (CBI)\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE 21st Conference on Business Informatics (CBI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI.2019.00056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 21st Conference on Business Informatics (CBI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI.2019.00056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

用户生成的在线评论和帖子越来越多地包含滥用内容,从道德和立法的角度来看,这些内容需要加以节制。在我们的数字世界里,评论的数量和对节制的需求往往超过了人工节制的能力。为了解决这个问题,平台通常采用半自动审核系统。然而,由于这样的系统通常是黑盒,用户对系统的信任和接受不容易实现,因为黑盒系统可以被认为是不透明的,并且用户评论的审核很容易与审查联系在一起。因此,我们通过一个在线实验来研究通过解释、用户信任和系统接受的系统透明度之间的关系。我们的研究结果表明,自动在线评论审核系统的透明度是用户信任系统的先决条件。然而,审核系统的客观透明度并不影响用户的接受程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Transparency and Trust on Acceptance of Automatic Online Comment Moderation Systems
User-generated online comments and posts increasingly contain abusive content that needs moderation from an ethical but also legislative perspective. The amount of comments and the need for moderation in our digital world often overpower the capacity of manual moderation. To remedy this, platforms often adopt semi-automated moderation systems. However, because such systems are typically black boxes, user trust in and acceptance of the system is not easily achieved, as black box systems can be perceived as nontransparent and moderating user comments is easily associated with censorship. Therefore, we investigate the relationship of system transparency through explanations, user trust and system acceptance with an online experiment. Our results show that the transparency of an automatic online comment moderation system is a prerequisite for user trust in the system. However, the objective transparency of the moderation system does not influence the user's acceptance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preconditions for the Use of a Checklist by Enterprise Architects to Improve the Quality of a Business Case A Framework for Industrial Symbiosis Systems for Agent-Based Simulation Conceptual Modeling Meets Customer Journey Mapping: Structuring a Tool for Service Innovation Are We Ready to Play in the Cloud? Developing new Quality Certifications to Tackle Challenges of Cloud Gaming Services Shadow IT and Business-Managed IT: Where Is the Theory?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1