使用stroop任务评估认知负荷

J. Gwizdka
{"title":"使用stroop任务评估认知负荷","authors":"J. Gwizdka","doi":"10.1145/1962300.1962345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Motivation -- Assessment of cognitive load on user tasks is useful for characterizing user interfaces and tasks with respect to their demands on the user's mental effort. Research approach -- We conducted a controlled experiment with 48 subjects. The primary task involved information search. Stroop-like task was used as a secondary task. Reaction time to the secondary task events was used to assess cognitive load. Findings/Design -- Reaction time on the secondary task differentiated between the primary task stages and the user interfaces. Higher cognitive load component of the secondary task performance discriminated primary task stages, while lower cognitive load component discriminated user interfaces. Research limitations/Implications -- Results presented in this short paper were an unexpected finding. They are thus preliminary and need to be confirmed in further experiments. Originality/Value -- This finding promises a method that separates extraneous cognitive load from intrinsic load. Take away message -- Secondary task can be designed to yield separate assessment of intrinsic and extraneous load.","PeriodicalId":115733,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 28th Annual European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using stroop task to assess cognitive load\",\"authors\":\"J. Gwizdka\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1962300.1962345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Motivation -- Assessment of cognitive load on user tasks is useful for characterizing user interfaces and tasks with respect to their demands on the user's mental effort. Research approach -- We conducted a controlled experiment with 48 subjects. The primary task involved information search. Stroop-like task was used as a secondary task. Reaction time to the secondary task events was used to assess cognitive load. Findings/Design -- Reaction time on the secondary task differentiated between the primary task stages and the user interfaces. Higher cognitive load component of the secondary task performance discriminated primary task stages, while lower cognitive load component discriminated user interfaces. Research limitations/Implications -- Results presented in this short paper were an unexpected finding. They are thus preliminary and need to be confirmed in further experiments. Originality/Value -- This finding promises a method that separates extraneous cognitive load from intrinsic load. Take away message -- Secondary task can be designed to yield separate assessment of intrinsic and extraneous load.\",\"PeriodicalId\":115733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 28th Annual European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 28th Annual European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1962300.1962345\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 28th Annual European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1962300.1962345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

动机——评估用户任务的认知负荷对于描述用户界面和任务对用户心理努力的需求是有用的。研究方法——我们对48名受试者进行了对照实验。主要任务涉及信息搜索。类似stroop的任务被用作次要任务。对次要任务事件的反应时间被用来评估认知负荷。发现/设计——次要任务的反应时间区别于主要任务阶段和用户界面。次要任务绩效的高认知负荷成分区分主要任务阶段,而低认知负荷成分区分用户界面。研究局限性/启示——这篇短文中提出的结果是一个意想不到的发现。因此,它们是初步的,需要在进一步的实验中得到证实。原创性/价值——这一发现提供了一种分离外在认知负荷和内在负荷的方法。带走的信息——次要任务可以被设计成对固有负载和外部负载进行单独评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using stroop task to assess cognitive load
Motivation -- Assessment of cognitive load on user tasks is useful for characterizing user interfaces and tasks with respect to their demands on the user's mental effort. Research approach -- We conducted a controlled experiment with 48 subjects. The primary task involved information search. Stroop-like task was used as a secondary task. Reaction time to the secondary task events was used to assess cognitive load. Findings/Design -- Reaction time on the secondary task differentiated between the primary task stages and the user interfaces. Higher cognitive load component of the secondary task performance discriminated primary task stages, while lower cognitive load component discriminated user interfaces. Research limitations/Implications -- Results presented in this short paper were an unexpected finding. They are thus preliminary and need to be confirmed in further experiments. Originality/Value -- This finding promises a method that separates extraneous cognitive load from intrinsic load. Take away message -- Secondary task can be designed to yield separate assessment of intrinsic and extraneous load.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysing online social support between professionals Assessment of user needs for self-management services in coronary heart disease: a designerly approach Older adults' attitude towards a monitoring technology Embodiment in games: designing for children's well being The use of robots in social behavior tutoring for children with ASD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1