目的比较Ziehl-Neelsen染色、CBNAAT及BAL(支气管肺泡灌洗液)培养在痰涂片阴性与无痰患者中的诊断敏感性

Vipin Deo Tiwari, Mazher Maqusood, G. Ramakrishna, R. Rastogi
{"title":"目的比较Ziehl-Neelsen染色、CBNAAT及BAL(支气管肺泡灌洗液)培养在痰涂片阴性与无痰患者中的诊断敏感性","authors":"Vipin Deo Tiwari, Mazher Maqusood, G. Ramakrishna, R. Rastogi","doi":"10.47009/ajmr.2020.9.1.pm4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Compare the diagnostic sensitivity of ZN staining and CBNAAT using Mycobacterium Culture as a gold standard in BAL fluid among sputum smear negative or non- sputum producing patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis.Subjects and Methods:Our prospective observational study was conducted on 76 patients either attending Outpatient Department or being admitted in the department of Pulmonary Medicine, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College & Research Centre, Moradabad (UP). BAL sample obtained using a flexible fibre-optic bronchoscope from sputum smear negative or non- sputum producing patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis. Sample was divided into three parts and send the BAL fluid for CBNAAT, ZN staining, and Mycobacterium liquid culture and compare the diagnostic sensitivity of ZN staining and CBNAAT using Mycobacterium Culture as a gold standard in BAL fluid.Results: Our study was carried out on 76 patients, ZN staining detected positive and negative in BAL samples among 17.1% and 82.9% respectively. CBNAAT detected positive and negative in BAL samples among 68.72% and 31.6% respectively. Among the positive detected specimens, rifampicin resistance and sensitive were found among 4 (5.56%) and 48 (63.16%) specimens respectively.MTB detected positive and negative in BAL samples among 51.3% and 48.7% of the subjects respectively. The gold standard BAL-MTB liquid culture was used to test the efficacy of ZN staining to detect the BAL specimen. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and Accuracy of ZN in the detection of BAL specimen were 23.08%, 89.19%, 69.23%, 52.38%, and 55.26% respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and Accuracy of CBNAAT in detection of BAL specimen were 92.31%, 66.76%, 79.23%, 87.50% and 75% respectively.Conclusion: Gene Xpert MTB/RIF assay is efficient and reliable technique for the smear negative cases. Its simplicity, sensitivity, speed and automation, make this technique a very attractive tool for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in smear negative cases of TB suspects. Meanwhile it has an added advantage of detection of multi-drug resistant cases.","PeriodicalId":407051,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Medical Research","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To Compare the Diagnostic Sensitivity of ZN (Ziehl-Neelsen) Staining, CBNAAT (Cartridge Based Nucleic Acid Amplification Test) and Mycobacterium Culture of BAL (Bronchoalveolar Lavage) Fluid among Sputum Smear Negative or Non- Sputum Producing Patients wi\",\"authors\":\"Vipin Deo Tiwari, Mazher Maqusood, G. Ramakrishna, R. Rastogi\",\"doi\":\"10.47009/ajmr.2020.9.1.pm4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Compare the diagnostic sensitivity of ZN staining and CBNAAT using Mycobacterium Culture as a gold standard in BAL fluid among sputum smear negative or non- sputum producing patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis.Subjects and Methods:Our prospective observational study was conducted on 76 patients either attending Outpatient Department or being admitted in the department of Pulmonary Medicine, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College & Research Centre, Moradabad (UP). BAL sample obtained using a flexible fibre-optic bronchoscope from sputum smear negative or non- sputum producing patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis. Sample was divided into three parts and send the BAL fluid for CBNAAT, ZN staining, and Mycobacterium liquid culture and compare the diagnostic sensitivity of ZN staining and CBNAAT using Mycobacterium Culture as a gold standard in BAL fluid.Results: Our study was carried out on 76 patients, ZN staining detected positive and negative in BAL samples among 17.1% and 82.9% respectively. CBNAAT detected positive and negative in BAL samples among 68.72% and 31.6% respectively. Among the positive detected specimens, rifampicin resistance and sensitive were found among 4 (5.56%) and 48 (63.16%) specimens respectively.MTB detected positive and negative in BAL samples among 51.3% and 48.7% of the subjects respectively. The gold standard BAL-MTB liquid culture was used to test the efficacy of ZN staining to detect the BAL specimen. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and Accuracy of ZN in the detection of BAL specimen were 23.08%, 89.19%, 69.23%, 52.38%, and 55.26% respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and Accuracy of CBNAAT in detection of BAL specimen were 92.31%, 66.76%, 79.23%, 87.50% and 75% respectively.Conclusion: Gene Xpert MTB/RIF assay is efficient and reliable technique for the smear negative cases. Its simplicity, sensitivity, speed and automation, make this technique a very attractive tool for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in smear negative cases of TB suspects. Meanwhile it has an added advantage of detection of multi-drug resistant cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":407051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47009/ajmr.2020.9.1.pm4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47009/ajmr.2020.9.1.pm4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:比较以分枝杆菌培养为金标准的锌染色和CBNAAT对痰涂片阴性或无痰的疑似肺结核患者BAL液的诊断敏感性。对象和方法:我们的前瞻性观察研究对莫拉达巴德(UP) Teerthanker Mahaveer医学院和研究中心肺内科门诊或住院的76例患者进行了研究。使用柔性纤维支气管镜从痰涂片阴性或无痰产生的疑似肺结核患者获得BAL样本。将样本分成三份,送BAL液进行CBNAAT、ZN染色和分枝杆菌液体培养,以分枝杆菌培养为金标准,比较BAL液中ZN染色和CBNAAT的诊断敏感性。结果:我们对76例患者进行了研究,锌染色在BAL标本中检出率为17.1%,检出率为82.9%。CBNAAT在BAL标本中的检出率分别为68.72%和31.6%。阳性标本中利福平耐药4例(5.56%),利福平敏感48例(63.16%)。BAL标本中MTB阳性和阴性检出率分别为51.3%和48.7%。采用金标准BAL- mtb液体培养,检测ZN染色对BAL标本的检测效果。ZN检测BAL标本的敏感性为23.08%,特异性为89.19%,PPV、NPV和准确性分别为69.23%、52.38%和55.26%。CBNAAT检测BAL标本的灵敏度、特异度、PPV、NPV和准确性分别为92.31%、66.76%、79.23%、87.50%和75%。结论:基因Xpert MTB/RIF检测是检测涂片阴性病例的有效、可靠的方法。该技术简便、灵敏、快速、自动化,是诊断涂片阴性肺结核疑似病例的一种极具吸引力的工具。同时,它还具有检测多重耐药病例的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
To Compare the Diagnostic Sensitivity of ZN (Ziehl-Neelsen) Staining, CBNAAT (Cartridge Based Nucleic Acid Amplification Test) and Mycobacterium Culture of BAL (Bronchoalveolar Lavage) Fluid among Sputum Smear Negative or Non- Sputum Producing Patients wi
Background: Compare the diagnostic sensitivity of ZN staining and CBNAAT using Mycobacterium Culture as a gold standard in BAL fluid among sputum smear negative or non- sputum producing patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis.Subjects and Methods:Our prospective observational study was conducted on 76 patients either attending Outpatient Department or being admitted in the department of Pulmonary Medicine, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College & Research Centre, Moradabad (UP). BAL sample obtained using a flexible fibre-optic bronchoscope from sputum smear negative or non- sputum producing patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis. Sample was divided into three parts and send the BAL fluid for CBNAAT, ZN staining, and Mycobacterium liquid culture and compare the diagnostic sensitivity of ZN staining and CBNAAT using Mycobacterium Culture as a gold standard in BAL fluid.Results: Our study was carried out on 76 patients, ZN staining detected positive and negative in BAL samples among 17.1% and 82.9% respectively. CBNAAT detected positive and negative in BAL samples among 68.72% and 31.6% respectively. Among the positive detected specimens, rifampicin resistance and sensitive were found among 4 (5.56%) and 48 (63.16%) specimens respectively.MTB detected positive and negative in BAL samples among 51.3% and 48.7% of the subjects respectively. The gold standard BAL-MTB liquid culture was used to test the efficacy of ZN staining to detect the BAL specimen. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and Accuracy of ZN in the detection of BAL specimen were 23.08%, 89.19%, 69.23%, 52.38%, and 55.26% respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and Accuracy of CBNAAT in detection of BAL specimen were 92.31%, 66.76%, 79.23%, 87.50% and 75% respectively.Conclusion: Gene Xpert MTB/RIF assay is efficient and reliable technique for the smear negative cases. Its simplicity, sensitivity, speed and automation, make this technique a very attractive tool for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in smear negative cases of TB suspects. Meanwhile it has an added advantage of detection of multi-drug resistant cases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Outcome of Pregnancies with Fibroids and its Associated Complications: A Prospective Study Floor Level Activity as a Sign of Congruency and Containment in Perthes’ Disease Osteoid Osteoma of Cuboid Bone- A Rare Cause of Chronic Foot Pain in Childhood –A Case Report Evaluation of Clinical Profile of Bipolar and Unipolar Depression Patients- A Clinical Study Study of Influence of Vaginal Ph on the efficacy of Dinoprostone gel for Induction of Labor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1