领先的以参与者为中心的研究:作为用户体验架构师扮演更具战略性角色的论点

Caitlin Ryan, L. Potts
{"title":"领先的以参与者为中心的研究:作为用户体验架构师扮演更具战略性角色的论点","authors":"Caitlin Ryan, L. Potts","doi":"10.1145/2775441.2775476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this experience report, we discuss our experiences in negotiating participant-based research in industry projects. For the past twenty years, academics and practitioners of participant-based research have worked to integrate practices and methods to improve the user experience of products and services. While it is clear that industry is seeing value in participant-centered research, there are difficulties in putting it into practice. Building upon prior research on methods with a firm foundation in technical communication and our experiences working on product teams, we argue that recognizing similarities of method across disparate schools of thought is one way to lead as experience architects. The goal of this work is to propose that we think and act in more strategic ways about participant-centered research as we work with product marketing and service development across our organizations. By reconsidering this work and our roles, we can work across organizations to guide and lead research that can benefit the organization as user experience architects, much in the same way that content strategists have met with success.","PeriodicalId":340459,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 33rd Annual International Conference on the Design of Communication","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leading participant-centered research: an argument for taking a more strategic role as user experience architects\",\"authors\":\"Caitlin Ryan, L. Potts\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2775441.2775476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this experience report, we discuss our experiences in negotiating participant-based research in industry projects. For the past twenty years, academics and practitioners of participant-based research have worked to integrate practices and methods to improve the user experience of products and services. While it is clear that industry is seeing value in participant-centered research, there are difficulties in putting it into practice. Building upon prior research on methods with a firm foundation in technical communication and our experiences working on product teams, we argue that recognizing similarities of method across disparate schools of thought is one way to lead as experience architects. The goal of this work is to propose that we think and act in more strategic ways about participant-centered research as we work with product marketing and service development across our organizations. By reconsidering this work and our roles, we can work across organizations to guide and lead research that can benefit the organization as user experience architects, much in the same way that content strategists have met with success.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 33rd Annual International Conference on the Design of Communication\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 33rd Annual International Conference on the Design of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2775441.2775476\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 33rd Annual International Conference on the Design of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2775441.2775476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在这份经验报告中,我们讨论了我们在谈判基于参与者的工业项目研究方面的经验。在过去的二十年里,基于参与者的研究的学者和实践者一直致力于整合实践和方法来改善产品和服务的用户体验。虽然很明显,工业界看到了以参与者为中心的研究的价值,但将其付诸实践却存在困难。基于先前对技术交流方法的研究,以及我们在产品团队中的工作经验,我们认为,认识到不同思想流派中方法的相似性是作为经验架构师进行领导的一种方式。这项工作的目标是建议我们在整个组织的产品营销和服务开发工作中,以更具战略性的方式思考和行动以参与者为中心的研究。通过重新考虑这项工作和我们的角色,我们可以跨组织工作来指导和领导研究,这些研究可以作为用户体验架构师使组织受益,就像内容战略家获得成功一样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Leading participant-centered research: an argument for taking a more strategic role as user experience architects
In this experience report, we discuss our experiences in negotiating participant-based research in industry projects. For the past twenty years, academics and practitioners of participant-based research have worked to integrate practices and methods to improve the user experience of products and services. While it is clear that industry is seeing value in participant-centered research, there are difficulties in putting it into practice. Building upon prior research on methods with a firm foundation in technical communication and our experiences working on product teams, we argue that recognizing similarities of method across disparate schools of thought is one way to lead as experience architects. The goal of this work is to propose that we think and act in more strategic ways about participant-centered research as we work with product marketing and service development across our organizations. By reconsidering this work and our roles, we can work across organizations to guide and lead research that can benefit the organization as user experience architects, much in the same way that content strategists have met with success.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Socio-technical gaps in online collaborative consumption (OCC): an example of the etsy community Factors to actors: implications of posthumanism for social justice work Target data breach: applying user-centered design principles to data breach notifications Envisioning mobile apps for audio description: exploring universal design of national park service brochures HART: the human affect recording tool
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1