欧洲行动者对和平之春行动的政策分析

Enes Bayrakli, Aslıhan Alkanat
{"title":"欧洲行动者对和平之春行动的政策分析","authors":"Enes Bayrakli, Aslıhan Alkanat","doi":"10.54078/savsad.1134215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There were many reactions from European actors to Turkey’s Operation Peace Spring (OPS), which was launched on October 9, 2019, in order to create a safe zone by cleansing the north of Syria from terrorist elements, facilitate the return of refugees, prevent DAESH activities in the region, and restrict the PKK/YPG’s movements. These reactions mostly include claims that Turkey’s operation violates international law, that the YPG will be weakened in the fight against DAESH, that the return of Foreign Terrorist Fighters to their countries of origin will cause political, legal and social problems in Europe, and that it will also lead to a new wave of migration to Europe. In this article, Operation Peace Spring is evaluated within the scope of international law and the principle of “self-defense” of Article 51 of the UN Charter. Furthermore, the policies of the EU and the leading actors of the EU, i.e., Germany, France and England towards Operation Peace Spring are examined.","PeriodicalId":158979,"journal":{"name":"SAVSAD Savunma ve Savaş Araştırmaları Dergisi","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AN ANALYSIS OF EUROPEAN ACTORS POLICIES TOWARDS OPERATION PEACE SPRING\",\"authors\":\"Enes Bayrakli, Aslıhan Alkanat\",\"doi\":\"10.54078/savsad.1134215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There were many reactions from European actors to Turkey’s Operation Peace Spring (OPS), which was launched on October 9, 2019, in order to create a safe zone by cleansing the north of Syria from terrorist elements, facilitate the return of refugees, prevent DAESH activities in the region, and restrict the PKK/YPG’s movements. These reactions mostly include claims that Turkey’s operation violates international law, that the YPG will be weakened in the fight against DAESH, that the return of Foreign Terrorist Fighters to their countries of origin will cause political, legal and social problems in Europe, and that it will also lead to a new wave of migration to Europe. In this article, Operation Peace Spring is evaluated within the scope of international law and the principle of “self-defense” of Article 51 of the UN Charter. Furthermore, the policies of the EU and the leading actors of the EU, i.e., Germany, France and England towards Operation Peace Spring are examined.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAVSAD Savunma ve Savaş Araştırmaları Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAVSAD Savunma ve Savaş Araştırmaları Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54078/savsad.1134215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAVSAD Savunma ve Savaş Araştırmaları Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54078/savsad.1134215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土耳其于2019年10月9日发起了“和平之春行动”(Operation Peace Spring, OPS),目的是清除叙利亚北部的恐怖分子,建立安全区,为难民返回提供便利,防止伊斯兰国在该地区的活动,并限制库尔德工人党/人民保卫军的行动。这些反应主要包括声称土耳其的行动违反了国际法,YPG将在打击DAESH的战斗中被削弱,外国恐怖主义战士返回其原籍国将在欧洲造成政治,法律和社会问题,并且还将导致新一波移民到欧洲。本文将在国际法和《联合国宪章》第51条“自卫”原则的范围内对“和平之春”行动进行评价。此外,欧盟和欧盟的主要参与者,即德国,法国和英国对和平之春行动的政策进行了审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AN ANALYSIS OF EUROPEAN ACTORS POLICIES TOWARDS OPERATION PEACE SPRING
There were many reactions from European actors to Turkey’s Operation Peace Spring (OPS), which was launched on October 9, 2019, in order to create a safe zone by cleansing the north of Syria from terrorist elements, facilitate the return of refugees, prevent DAESH activities in the region, and restrict the PKK/YPG’s movements. These reactions mostly include claims that Turkey’s operation violates international law, that the YPG will be weakened in the fight against DAESH, that the return of Foreign Terrorist Fighters to their countries of origin will cause political, legal and social problems in Europe, and that it will also lead to a new wave of migration to Europe. In this article, Operation Peace Spring is evaluated within the scope of international law and the principle of “self-defense” of Article 51 of the UN Charter. Furthermore, the policies of the EU and the leading actors of the EU, i.e., Germany, France and England towards Operation Peace Spring are examined.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
TÜRKİYE’NİN IRAK’IN KUZEYİNDE YER ALAN PKK UNSURLARINA YÖNELİK 2015-2020 YILLARI ARASINDA İCRA ETTİĞİ SINIR ÖTESİ OPERASYONLAR VE SINIR GÜVENLİĞİNE KATKISI Military Human Enhancement Technologies and Reinterpretation of Fundamental Principles of International Humanitarian Law Türk Savunma Sanayinin İhracat Rekabet Gücünün Belirlenmesi Australian Foreign Policy in the Asia-Pacific Region in Context of Fear of Occupation and the Immigrant Problem from 1918 to Present Comparative Evaluation of Organizational Structures in The Defense Supply Chain of Countries and Organizational Model Proposal for Türkiye
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1