代际、代际和国际风险分担的社会保障和制度

Robert J. Shiller
{"title":"代际、代际和国际风险分担的社会保障和制度","authors":"Robert J. Shiller","doi":"10.1016/S0167-2231(99)00026-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Social security system old-age insurance systems are devices for the sharing of income risks of elderly people with others. Risks can be shared intergenerationally (with the young of the same country), intragenerationally (with other elderly of the same country), or internationally (with foreigners).</p><p>Barriers to individuals themselves sharing their risks intergenerationally, intragenerationally, or internationally are described. Optimal design of government-sponsored social security systems is considered in light of these barriers. Alternative benefits and contributions formulas for pay-as-you-go social security systems are defined and compared with existing and proposed formulas in terms of their ability to fulfill the government's role in promoting risk-sharing. Benefits for each retired person may be tied to that person's lifetime income without causing (as with the U.S. benefits formula today) aggregate benefits for all elderly today to be tied to their past aggregate income.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100218,"journal":{"name":"Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy","volume":"50 ","pages":"Pages 165-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0167-2231(99)00026-3","citationCount":"150","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social security and institutions for intergenerational, intragenerational, and international risk-sharing\",\"authors\":\"Robert J. Shiller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0167-2231(99)00026-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Social security system old-age insurance systems are devices for the sharing of income risks of elderly people with others. Risks can be shared intergenerationally (with the young of the same country), intragenerationally (with other elderly of the same country), or internationally (with foreigners).</p><p>Barriers to individuals themselves sharing their risks intergenerationally, intragenerationally, or internationally are described. Optimal design of government-sponsored social security systems is considered in light of these barriers. Alternative benefits and contributions formulas for pay-as-you-go social security systems are defined and compared with existing and proposed formulas in terms of their ability to fulfill the government's role in promoting risk-sharing. Benefits for each retired person may be tied to that person's lifetime income without causing (as with the U.S. benefits formula today) aggregate benefits for all elderly today to be tied to their past aggregate income.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy\",\"volume\":\"50 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 165-204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0167-2231(99)00026-3\",\"citationCount\":\"150\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167223199000263\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167223199000263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 150

摘要

社会保障制度养老保险制度是老年人与他人分担收入风险的机制。风险可以代际(同一国家的年轻人)、代际(同一国家的其他老年人)或国际(与外国人)共同承担。描述了个体本身在代际、代际或国际上分担风险的障碍。根据这些障碍,考虑政府资助的社会保障制度的优化设计。确定现收现收的社会保障制度的备选福利和缴费公式,并根据其履行政府促进风险分担作用的能力,与现有和拟议的公式进行比较。每个退休人员的福利可能与该人的终身收入挂钩,而不会导致今天所有老年人的总福利与他们过去的总收入挂钩(就像今天的美国福利公式一样)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social security and institutions for intergenerational, intragenerational, and international risk-sharing

Social security system old-age insurance systems are devices for the sharing of income risks of elderly people with others. Risks can be shared intergenerationally (with the young of the same country), intragenerationally (with other elderly of the same country), or internationally (with foreigners).

Barriers to individuals themselves sharing their risks intergenerationally, intragenerationally, or internationally are described. Optimal design of government-sponsored social security systems is considered in light of these barriers. Alternative benefits and contributions formulas for pay-as-you-go social security systems are defined and compared with existing and proposed formulas in terms of their ability to fulfill the government's role in promoting risk-sharing. Benefits for each retired person may be tied to that person's lifetime income without causing (as with the U.S. benefits formula today) aggregate benefits for all elderly today to be tied to their past aggregate income.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A quantitative model of the British industrial revolution, 1780–1850 a comment Searching for prosperity a comment Computers and growth with frictions: aggregate and disaggregate evidence A comment Computers and growth with frictions: aggregate and disaggregate evidence Deunionization, technical change, and inequality A comment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1