是时候做出改变了:用精英理论取代民粹主义模式

Scott G. Cole
{"title":"是时候做出改变了:用精英理论取代民粹主义模式","authors":"Scott G. Cole","doi":"10.55271/jps000113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, populism has been used to explain the actions of politicians around the globe, from Jair Bolsonaro to Boris Johnson. This presents a problem for scholars who are seeking to understand present-day political trends. Essentially, the populist school does not have a coherent definition of its subject matter, cannot accurately identify who should get this label, and is unable to correctly explain the behaviors of those leaders who acquire the moniker. Since elite theory stands on stronger ground when it comes to these dimensions, it should be used instead to evaluate the events and actors that are currently explored using the populist model. After providing evidence to support this argument, a concluding section proposes future research projects that can strengthen the claim that elite theory is a better way to understand politics.","PeriodicalId":250217,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Populism Studies","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time for a change: replacing the populist model with elite theory\",\"authors\":\"Scott G. Cole\",\"doi\":\"10.55271/jps000113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, populism has been used to explain the actions of politicians around the globe, from Jair Bolsonaro to Boris Johnson. This presents a problem for scholars who are seeking to understand present-day political trends. Essentially, the populist school does not have a coherent definition of its subject matter, cannot accurately identify who should get this label, and is unable to correctly explain the behaviors of those leaders who acquire the moniker. Since elite theory stands on stronger ground when it comes to these dimensions, it should be used instead to evaluate the events and actors that are currently explored using the populist model. After providing evidence to support this argument, a concluding section proposes future research projects that can strengthen the claim that elite theory is a better way to understand politics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":250217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Populism Studies\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Populism Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55271/jps000113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Populism Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55271/jps000113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,民粹主义被用来解释全球政治家的行为,从雅伊尔·博尔索纳罗到鲍里斯·约翰逊。这给试图理解当今政治趋势的学者提出了一个问题。从本质上讲,民粹主义学派对其主题没有一个连贯的定义,不能准确地确定谁应该得到这个标签,也不能正确地解释那些获得这个标签的领导人的行为。由于精英理论在这些维度上站在更坚实的基础上,它应该被用来评估目前使用民粹主义模型探索的事件和行动者。在提供了支持这一论点的证据之后,结束语部分提出了未来的研究项目,可以加强精英理论是理解政治的更好方法的主张。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Time for a change: replacing the populist model with elite theory
In recent years, populism has been used to explain the actions of politicians around the globe, from Jair Bolsonaro to Boris Johnson. This presents a problem for scholars who are seeking to understand present-day political trends. Essentially, the populist school does not have a coherent definition of its subject matter, cannot accurately identify who should get this label, and is unable to correctly explain the behaviors of those leaders who acquire the moniker. Since elite theory stands on stronger ground when it comes to these dimensions, it should be used instead to evaluate the events and actors that are currently explored using the populist model. After providing evidence to support this argument, a concluding section proposes future research projects that can strengthen the claim that elite theory is a better way to understand politics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Populism’s Building Complex; or: Is there such a thing as Populist Architecture? Government participation and populist discourse transformation of radical left Syriza and radical right Anel The Use of Medical Populism to Claim the Right to Rule in Poland during a Public Health Emergency Time for a change: replacing the populist model with elite theory Crisis and Populism: The role of crisis exploitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1