法院驳回迈克尔·麦卡杜禁令救济的判决分析

Timothy Liam Epstein
{"title":"法院驳回迈克尔·麦卡杜禁令救济的判决分析","authors":"Timothy Liam Epstein","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1956570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the denial of UNC's defensive end Michael McAdoo's request for permanent injunction. McAdoo was found ineligible due to accepting money from an agent, which he claims he did not realize he was receiving, and for academic violations. Although he was denied permanent injunction there is an NCAA hearing scheduled for October.","PeriodicalId":344388,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Civil Procedure eJournal","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Analysis of a Court's Decision to Deny Injunctive Relief to Michael McAdoo\",\"authors\":\"Timothy Liam Epstein\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1956570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article discusses the denial of UNC's defensive end Michael McAdoo's request for permanent injunction. McAdoo was found ineligible due to accepting money from an agent, which he claims he did not realize he was receiving, and for academic violations. Although he was denied permanent injunction there is an NCAA hearing scheduled for October.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Society: Civil Procedure eJournal\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Society: Civil Procedure eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1956570\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Civil Procedure eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1956570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了拒绝联合国军防守端迈克尔·麦卡杜的永久禁令请求。麦卡杜被判不合格,因为他从经纪人那里接受了钱,他声称他没有意识到他收到了钱,还有学术违规。尽管他被拒绝了永久禁令,但NCAA定于10月举行听证会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Analysis of a Court's Decision to Deny Injunctive Relief to Michael McAdoo
This article discusses the denial of UNC's defensive end Michael McAdoo's request for permanent injunction. McAdoo was found ineligible due to accepting money from an agent, which he claims he did not realize he was receiving, and for academic violations. Although he was denied permanent injunction there is an NCAA hearing scheduled for October.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Observing Online Courts: Lessons from the Pandemic Discovery as Regulation Section 89 of the CPC: ADR and Business Disputes. Brief for Samuel L. Bray as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioners, Merck & Co. v. Gilead Sciences, Inc. Adversarial Persuasion with Cross-Examination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1