下颌角骨折固定装置的生物力学评价

J. Wittenberg, B. Smith, R. N. Kruse, D. P. Mukherjee
{"title":"下颌角骨折固定装置的生物力学评价","authors":"J. Wittenberg, B. Smith, R. N. Kruse, D. P. Mukherjee","doi":"10.1109/SBEC.1995.514426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The treatment of mandibular angle fractures is plagued with the highest postsurgical complication rate of all mandibular fractures. Multiple plating systems are available. In this study four plating variations were compared in a biomechanical in vitro study. All plating systems were noncompressive Synthes titanium plates. The 3.0 mm reconstruction plate with 6 holes, the 2 mm universal fracture plate with 6 and 8 holes and tension bands and the 6 hole universal fracture plate without tension band were compared. Measurements of gaps at the osteotomy sites showed no significant difference for the plating systems. However the vertical (inferior/superior) displacements were significantly higher for the six-hole plate without tension. The horizontal (bucca/lingual) displacement for the six-hole plate without tension had also highest displacement value. The addition of a tension band was effective to reduce these displacement values. Quantitative computed tomography scans were used to demonstrate a minimal difference in bone quality.","PeriodicalId":332563,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 1995 Fourteenth Southern Biomedical Engineering Conference","volume":"297 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical evaluation of fixation devices for mandibular angle fractures\",\"authors\":\"J. Wittenberg, B. Smith, R. N. Kruse, D. P. Mukherjee\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SBEC.1995.514426\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The treatment of mandibular angle fractures is plagued with the highest postsurgical complication rate of all mandibular fractures. Multiple plating systems are available. In this study four plating variations were compared in a biomechanical in vitro study. All plating systems were noncompressive Synthes titanium plates. The 3.0 mm reconstruction plate with 6 holes, the 2 mm universal fracture plate with 6 and 8 holes and tension bands and the 6 hole universal fracture plate without tension band were compared. Measurements of gaps at the osteotomy sites showed no significant difference for the plating systems. However the vertical (inferior/superior) displacements were significantly higher for the six-hole plate without tension. The horizontal (bucca/lingual) displacement for the six-hole plate without tension had also highest displacement value. The addition of a tension band was effective to reduce these displacement values. Quantitative computed tomography scans were used to demonstrate a minimal difference in bone quality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":332563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 1995 Fourteenth Southern Biomedical Engineering Conference\",\"volume\":\"297 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 1995 Fourteenth Southern Biomedical Engineering Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SBEC.1995.514426\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 1995 Fourteenth Southern Biomedical Engineering Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SBEC.1995.514426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

下颌骨角骨折是所有下颌骨骨折中术后并发症发生率最高的。多种电镀系统可供选择。本研究在体外生物力学研究中比较了四种镀层变化。所有电镀系统均为非压缩合成钛板。比较带6孔的3.0 mm重建钢板、带6孔和8孔张力带的2mm万能骨折钢板以及不带张力带的6孔万能骨折钢板。截骨处间隙的测量结果显示,两种钢板系统间无显著差异。然而,没有张力的六孔钢板的垂直(下/上)位移明显更高。无张力六孔钢板的水平(颊/舌)位移值也最高。张力带的加入有效地降低了这些位移值。定量计算机断层扫描用于证明骨质量的微小差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Biomechanical evaluation of fixation devices for mandibular angle fractures
The treatment of mandibular angle fractures is plagued with the highest postsurgical complication rate of all mandibular fractures. Multiple plating systems are available. In this study four plating variations were compared in a biomechanical in vitro study. All plating systems were noncompressive Synthes titanium plates. The 3.0 mm reconstruction plate with 6 holes, the 2 mm universal fracture plate with 6 and 8 holes and tension bands and the 6 hole universal fracture plate without tension band were compared. Measurements of gaps at the osteotomy sites showed no significant difference for the plating systems. However the vertical (inferior/superior) displacements were significantly higher for the six-hole plate without tension. The horizontal (bucca/lingual) displacement for the six-hole plate without tension had also highest displacement value. The addition of a tension band was effective to reduce these displacement values. Quantitative computed tomography scans were used to demonstrate a minimal difference in bone quality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In vivo characterization of hydroxylapatite (HA) coated pyrolytic carbon implants The effects of wetness on coefficient of friction measurement evaluated with three slip testers with varied residence times on selected materials Dynamic three-dimensional in vivo tracking of the abnormal extensor mechanism Resorbable chitosan matrix-a promising biomaterial for the future Sterilization condition of UHMWPE is measured by thermoluminescence technique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1