改进产品线形式化方法可用性的建议

J. Atlee, Sandy Beidu, N. Day, Fathiyeh Faghih, Pourya Shaker
{"title":"改进产品线形式化方法可用性的建议","authors":"J. Atlee, Sandy Beidu, N. Day, Fathiyeh Faghih, Pourya Shaker","doi":"10.1109/FormaliSE.2013.6612276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While there may be general agreement on what it means for a formal method to be usable (e.g., ease of modelling, automated and scalable analysis), there is no consensus in the software-engineering or formal-methods communities on what strategies lead to more usable formalisms. In this paper, we aim to raise discussion around such strategies by proposing fourteen concrete recommendations for achieving practical formal methods. Our recommendations apply to research in formal modelling, automated analysis, and automated transformation (e.g., transforming a model into the input to an analysis tool). Our recommendations focus on formal methods for functional requirements of software product lines, as per our experience in this area as part of a research project in collaboration with an automotive manufacturer; however, most of the recommendations apply to formal methods in general. We also provide a brief overview of a formal modelling language and an underdevelopment tool chain that realizes our recommendations.","PeriodicalId":269932,"journal":{"name":"2013 1st FME Workshop on Formal Methods in Software Engineering (FormaliSE)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recommendations for improving the usability of formal methods for product lines\",\"authors\":\"J. Atlee, Sandy Beidu, N. Day, Fathiyeh Faghih, Pourya Shaker\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FormaliSE.2013.6612276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While there may be general agreement on what it means for a formal method to be usable (e.g., ease of modelling, automated and scalable analysis), there is no consensus in the software-engineering or formal-methods communities on what strategies lead to more usable formalisms. In this paper, we aim to raise discussion around such strategies by proposing fourteen concrete recommendations for achieving practical formal methods. Our recommendations apply to research in formal modelling, automated analysis, and automated transformation (e.g., transforming a model into the input to an analysis tool). Our recommendations focus on formal methods for functional requirements of software product lines, as per our experience in this area as part of a research project in collaboration with an automotive manufacturer; however, most of the recommendations apply to formal methods in general. We also provide a brief overview of a formal modelling language and an underdevelopment tool chain that realizes our recommendations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 1st FME Workshop on Formal Methods in Software Engineering (FormaliSE)\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 1st FME Workshop on Formal Methods in Software Engineering (FormaliSE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FormaliSE.2013.6612276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 1st FME Workshop on Formal Methods in Software Engineering (FormaliSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FormaliSE.2013.6612276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

虽然对于形式化方法的可用性(例如,易于建模、自动化和可伸缩分析)的含义可能存在普遍的共识,但在软件工程或形式化方法社区中,对于哪种策略导致更可用的形式化并没有达成共识。在本文中,我们的目标是通过提出实现实用的形式化方法的14个具体建议来提出围绕这些策略的讨论。我们的建议适用于形式化建模、自动化分析和自动化转换(例如,将模型转换为分析工具的输入)方面的研究。我们的建议侧重于软件产品线功能需求的形式化方法,根据我们在该领域的经验,作为与一家汽车制造商合作的研究项目的一部分;然而,大多数建议一般适用于正式方法。我们还简要概述了一种正式的建模语言和一个尚未开发的工具链,以实现我们的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recommendations for improving the usability of formal methods for product lines
While there may be general agreement on what it means for a formal method to be usable (e.g., ease of modelling, automated and scalable analysis), there is no consensus in the software-engineering or formal-methods communities on what strategies lead to more usable formalisms. In this paper, we aim to raise discussion around such strategies by proposing fourteen concrete recommendations for achieving practical formal methods. Our recommendations apply to research in formal modelling, automated analysis, and automated transformation (e.g., transforming a model into the input to an analysis tool). Our recommendations focus on formal methods for functional requirements of software product lines, as per our experience in this area as part of a research project in collaboration with an automotive manufacturer; however, most of the recommendations apply to formal methods in general. We also provide a brief overview of a formal modelling language and an underdevelopment tool chain that realizes our recommendations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recommendations for improving the usability of formal methods for product lines Do you speak Z? Formal methods under the perspective of a cross-cultural adaptation problem A framework for the rigorous design of highly adaptive timed systems Though this be madness, yet there is method in it? (Keynote) An integrated data model verifier with property templates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1