{"title":"Wypowiedzi wartościujące jako istotny aspekt dyskursu wideoblogowego na przykładzie kanału „Stanowo” o tematyce kryminalnej","authors":"Ewa Gorlewska","doi":"10.15290/baj.2021.21.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of the paper is valuation statements present in videoblog discourse. The material is based on audiovisual recordings broadcast on the “Stanowo” channel. The aim of the analysis is to explore the way in which judgements are expressed that relate crime seen as a sensitive aspect of social life. It has been shown that the author rarely uses messages marked axiologically in her material. Her priority is to present facts accurately rather than to make judgements. Statements involving valuation of facts do appear in her statements, especially in those in which the author manifests her emotional involvement in the story. This leads to a conclusion that there is a close relationship between expressiveness and valuing, as revealed in the material studied. Irony, contrasting and comparisons are the most common linguistic tool used by the author to express value judgements. The use on names is a metaphorical sense also plays an important role. Three pillars of the stories presented are assessed: the event itself and its circumstances, the victim and the perpetrator. It has been shown that valuation of the facts discussed has two objectives: the presentation of personal positions, which facilitates the creation of a kind of sender-receiver relationship, and the release of tension generated by the absorption of information about violent events. In the conclusion it has been stated that the way reality is valued by a popular video blogger may cause her axiological perspective to be adopted especially by young, morally unformed viewers. Therefore, it should be regarded as positive that the author does not deviate from generally accepted patterns of assessing the behaviour of victims and perpetrators. On the other hand, the style of the presented valuation statements can be assessed negatively – the author uses colloquial style, however, this form of language is out of keeping with the solemnity of the events under discussion.","PeriodicalId":206692,"journal":{"name":"Białostockie Archiwum Językowe","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Białostockie Archiwum Językowe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15290/baj.2021.21.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的主题是目前在视频博客话语估值报表。材料是根据“Stanowo”频道播放的视听录音制作的。分析的目的是探讨如何表达将犯罪视为社会生活的一个敏感方面的判断。研究表明,作者在其材料中很少使用价值论标记的信息。她的首要任务是准确地呈现事实,而不是作出判断。她的叙述中确实出现了对事实的评价,尤其是那些作者在故事中表现出情感参与的叙述。由此得出的结论是,正如所研究的材料所揭示的那样,表现力和价值之间存在着密切的关系。反讽、对比和比较是作者表达价值判断最常用的语言工具。名字的使用在隐喻意义上也起着重要的作用。对所呈现的故事的三个支柱进行评估:事件本身及其环境,受害者和肇事者。已经表明,对所讨论的事实的评价有两个目标:一是提出个人立场,这有助于建立一种发送者-接受者关系,二是释放因吸收有关暴力事件的信息而产生的紧张。在结论中,有人指出,一位受欢迎的视频博主对现实的评价方式可能会导致她的价值论观点被年轻的、道德不成熟的观众所接受。因此,发件人没有偏离普遍接受的评估受害者和犯罪者行为的模式,这应该被视为是积极的。另一方面,所呈现的估价陈述的风格可以被消极地评价——作者使用了口语化的风格,然而,这种语言形式与所讨论事件的严肃性不协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Wypowiedzi wartościujące jako istotny aspekt dyskursu wideoblogowego na przykładzie kanału „Stanowo” o tematyce kryminalnej
The subject of the paper is valuation statements present in videoblog discourse. The material is based on audiovisual recordings broadcast on the “Stanowo” channel. The aim of the analysis is to explore the way in which judgements are expressed that relate crime seen as a sensitive aspect of social life. It has been shown that the author rarely uses messages marked axiologically in her material. Her priority is to present facts accurately rather than to make judgements. Statements involving valuation of facts do appear in her statements, especially in those in which the author manifests her emotional involvement in the story. This leads to a conclusion that there is a close relationship between expressiveness and valuing, as revealed in the material studied. Irony, contrasting and comparisons are the most common linguistic tool used by the author to express value judgements. The use on names is a metaphorical sense also plays an important role. Three pillars of the stories presented are assessed: the event itself and its circumstances, the victim and the perpetrator. It has been shown that valuation of the facts discussed has two objectives: the presentation of personal positions, which facilitates the creation of a kind of sender-receiver relationship, and the release of tension generated by the absorption of information about violent events. In the conclusion it has been stated that the way reality is valued by a popular video blogger may cause her axiological perspective to be adopted especially by young, morally unformed viewers. Therefore, it should be regarded as positive that the author does not deviate from generally accepted patterns of assessing the behaviour of victims and perpetrators. On the other hand, the style of the presented valuation statements can be assessed negatively – the author uses colloquial style, however, this form of language is out of keeping with the solemnity of the events under discussion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
O sakramencie pokuty w kazaniach ks. Piotra Skargi i Konstantego Szyrwida (podobieństwa i różnice) Cognitive linguistics – a historical context Iwona Benenowska, List jak orzech pełnowartościowy... – o języku listów Marii Pawlikowskiej-Jasnorzewskiej, Bydgoszcz 2021, ss. 186 Bibliografia prac prof. Zenona Leszczyńskiego opublikowanych w latach 2003–2021 Matka w poetyckim obrazie świata Wisławy Szymborskiej
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1