原因还是结果?国家经济成果与社会资本竞争代理之间的相互作用

Liana Isayan
{"title":"原因还是结果?国家经济成果与社会资本竞争代理之间的相互作用","authors":"Liana Isayan","doi":"10.14254/2071-789x.2022/15-2/4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The repository of literature studying the relationship between economic indicators and social capital through traditional surveys data is growing. At the same time, the emergence of social networks has created competing big data that require in-depth analysis and comparison of results. The aim of this research is to analyze the interaction between countries’ economic outcomes and proxy indicators of social capital, considering and comparing the traditional data of surveys and Facebook’s data of social connectedness index. Correlation analysis, Granger and Dumitrescu Hurlin Panel Causality tests, Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression methods of analysis on panel and cross-country data are used to show that countries’ GDP per capita indicator is a cause for higher social capital, while social connectedness indicators explain only a very small part of the GDP per capita indicator. It is also shown that institutional trust and networks elements of social capital are the most influential and statistically significant explaining variables of GDP per capita (in case of the latter variable, the connection is two-sided). The scientific contribution of this study is that it brings research growing in two different directions into one dimension. The results of the analysis are also of practical importance for public policy development, social media companies and the buyers-users of their data.","PeriodicalId":409504,"journal":{"name":"Economics & Sociology","volume":"280 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causations or payoffs? The interaction between countries’ economic results and competing proxies of social capital\",\"authors\":\"Liana Isayan\",\"doi\":\"10.14254/2071-789x.2022/15-2/4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The repository of literature studying the relationship between economic indicators and social capital through traditional surveys data is growing. At the same time, the emergence of social networks has created competing big data that require in-depth analysis and comparison of results. The aim of this research is to analyze the interaction between countries’ economic outcomes and proxy indicators of social capital, considering and comparing the traditional data of surveys and Facebook’s data of social connectedness index. Correlation analysis, Granger and Dumitrescu Hurlin Panel Causality tests, Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression methods of analysis on panel and cross-country data are used to show that countries’ GDP per capita indicator is a cause for higher social capital, while social connectedness indicators explain only a very small part of the GDP per capita indicator. It is also shown that institutional trust and networks elements of social capital are the most influential and statistically significant explaining variables of GDP per capita (in case of the latter variable, the connection is two-sided). The scientific contribution of this study is that it brings research growing in two different directions into one dimension. The results of the analysis are also of practical importance for public policy development, social media companies and the buyers-users of their data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":409504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics & Sociology\",\"volume\":\"280 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics & Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789x.2022/15-2/4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics & Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789x.2022/15-2/4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过传统调查数据研究经济指标与社会资本之间关系的文献越来越多。与此同时,社交网络的出现产生了相互竞争的大数据,需要对结果进行深入分析和比较。本研究的目的是分析国家经济成果与社会资本代理指标之间的相互作用,考虑并比较传统的调查数据和Facebook的社会连通性指数数据。通过相关分析、Granger和Dumitrescu Hurlin面板因果检验、面板和跨国数据分析的普通最小二乘(OLS)回归方法表明,各国的人均GDP指标是社会资本较高的原因,而社会联系度指标只能解释人均GDP指标的很小一部分。研究还表明,制度信任和社会资本的网络要素是人均GDP最具影响力和统计意义的解释变量(在后一变量的情况下,这种联系是双向的)。这项研究的科学贡献在于它将两个不同方向的研究带入了一个维度。分析结果对公共政策制定、社交媒体公司及其数据的买家-用户也具有实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Causations or payoffs? The interaction between countries’ economic results and competing proxies of social capital
The repository of literature studying the relationship between economic indicators and social capital through traditional surveys data is growing. At the same time, the emergence of social networks has created competing big data that require in-depth analysis and comparison of results. The aim of this research is to analyze the interaction between countries’ economic outcomes and proxy indicators of social capital, considering and comparing the traditional data of surveys and Facebook’s data of social connectedness index. Correlation analysis, Granger and Dumitrescu Hurlin Panel Causality tests, Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression methods of analysis on panel and cross-country data are used to show that countries’ GDP per capita indicator is a cause for higher social capital, while social connectedness indicators explain only a very small part of the GDP per capita indicator. It is also shown that institutional trust and networks elements of social capital are the most influential and statistically significant explaining variables of GDP per capita (in case of the latter variable, the connection is two-sided). The scientific contribution of this study is that it brings research growing in two different directions into one dimension. The results of the analysis are also of practical importance for public policy development, social media companies and the buyers-users of their data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Phenomena of precarity among young graduates – Hungarian case study Expectations of fulfilling the grandparent role in the context of maintaining professional activity. Analysis of an international survey Socio-economic profiles of countries - cybercrime victims Viruses don't need a passport to affect labor markets – findings from a Polish-German study on combating unemployment during the COVID-19 pandemic Cross-border mergers and acquisitions in the context of economic-behavioral phenomena
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1