KWL作为连接自我评估和反馈的可能模型:学生的观点

V. Pagani
{"title":"KWL作为连接自我评估和反馈的可能模型:学生的观点","authors":"V. Pagani","doi":"10.33422/ictle.2019.03.167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Assessment in higher education can have two functions: providing credentials or improving learning (Boud et al., 1999). As far as the latter purpose is concerned, self-assessment is seen as one of the key elements of formative assessment since its use enhances learning and achievement (Harris & Brown, 2013). Despite of this, Panadero and colleagues (2014) affirmed that “the Spanish higher education context does not have clear guidelines about what type of assessment should be implemented” (p. 371), so that Spanish university students are evaluated through traditional approaches, mostly exams and written work (Ion & Cano, 2011). Instead, using participative assessment strategies such as self-assessment improves students’ understanding of feedback (Sadler, 2010), an important factor that helps students to monitor their work as well as to regulate their learning (Nicol, 2010). Self-regulation of learning requires the exercise of meta-cognitive functioning where students monitor and evaluate their performances and generate feedback (Zimmerman, 2008). Using a mixed method, the present study explores how university students report making use of self-assessment and feedback. The subjects are 309 students enrolled in both Philosophy and Educational Sciences, at the Universidad Autónoma of Madrid. Starting from their opinions, the research has experimented the use of a metacognitive model, the Know-Want-Learn method, originally designed by Ogle in 1986, to verify if it could be useful for students to better self-assess themselves, using feedback and more active participation. Although the sample is not representative of the higher education population, it is large enough to allow reasonable reflections.","PeriodicalId":196816,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of The International Conference on Teaching, Learning and Education","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"KWL AS A POSSIBLE MODEL TO CONNECT SELF-ASSESSMENT AND FEEDBACK: THE STUDENTS’ VIEW\",\"authors\":\"V. Pagani\",\"doi\":\"10.33422/ictle.2019.03.167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". Assessment in higher education can have two functions: providing credentials or improving learning (Boud et al., 1999). As far as the latter purpose is concerned, self-assessment is seen as one of the key elements of formative assessment since its use enhances learning and achievement (Harris & Brown, 2013). Despite of this, Panadero and colleagues (2014) affirmed that “the Spanish higher education context does not have clear guidelines about what type of assessment should be implemented” (p. 371), so that Spanish university students are evaluated through traditional approaches, mostly exams and written work (Ion & Cano, 2011). Instead, using participative assessment strategies such as self-assessment improves students’ understanding of feedback (Sadler, 2010), an important factor that helps students to monitor their work as well as to regulate their learning (Nicol, 2010). Self-regulation of learning requires the exercise of meta-cognitive functioning where students monitor and evaluate their performances and generate feedback (Zimmerman, 2008). Using a mixed method, the present study explores how university students report making use of self-assessment and feedback. The subjects are 309 students enrolled in both Philosophy and Educational Sciences, at the Universidad Autónoma of Madrid. Starting from their opinions, the research has experimented the use of a metacognitive model, the Know-Want-Learn method, originally designed by Ogle in 1986, to verify if it could be useful for students to better self-assess themselves, using feedback and more active participation. Although the sample is not representative of the higher education population, it is large enough to allow reasonable reflections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":196816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of The International Conference on Teaching, Learning and Education\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of The International Conference on Teaching, Learning and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33422/ictle.2019.03.167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of The International Conference on Teaching, Learning and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/ictle.2019.03.167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

。高等教育中的评估可以有两个功能:提供证书或改善学习(Boud等,1999)。就后一种目的而言,自我评估被视为形成性评估的关键要素之一,因为它的使用可以提高学习和成就(Harris & Brown, 2013)。尽管如此,Panadero和同事(2014)确认“西班牙高等教育背景没有明确的指导方针,关于应该实施哪种类型的评估”(第371页),因此西班牙大学生通过传统的方法进行评估,主要是考试和书面作业(Ion & Cano, 2011)。相反,使用参与式评估策略,如自我评估,可以提高学生对反馈的理解(Sadler, 2010),这是帮助学生监控自己的工作和调节学习的一个重要因素(Nicol, 2010)。学习的自我调节需要元认知功能的锻炼,学生在其中监控和评估他们的表现并产生反馈(Zimmerman, 2008)。本研究采用混合方法,探讨大学生如何利用自我评估和反馈。研究对象是马德里大学Autónoma哲学和教育科学专业的309名学生。从他们的观点出发,该研究尝试使用了一种元认知模型,即Ogle最初于1986年设计的“知道-想-学习”方法,以验证它是否有助于学生通过反馈和更积极的参与来更好地自我评估。虽然样本不能代表受过高等教育的人口,但它的规模足够大,可以进行合理的反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
KWL AS A POSSIBLE MODEL TO CONNECT SELF-ASSESSMENT AND FEEDBACK: THE STUDENTS’ VIEW
. Assessment in higher education can have two functions: providing credentials or improving learning (Boud et al., 1999). As far as the latter purpose is concerned, self-assessment is seen as one of the key elements of formative assessment since its use enhances learning and achievement (Harris & Brown, 2013). Despite of this, Panadero and colleagues (2014) affirmed that “the Spanish higher education context does not have clear guidelines about what type of assessment should be implemented” (p. 371), so that Spanish university students are evaluated through traditional approaches, mostly exams and written work (Ion & Cano, 2011). Instead, using participative assessment strategies such as self-assessment improves students’ understanding of feedback (Sadler, 2010), an important factor that helps students to monitor their work as well as to regulate their learning (Nicol, 2010). Self-regulation of learning requires the exercise of meta-cognitive functioning where students monitor and evaluate their performances and generate feedback (Zimmerman, 2008). Using a mixed method, the present study explores how university students report making use of self-assessment and feedback. The subjects are 309 students enrolled in both Philosophy and Educational Sciences, at the Universidad Autónoma of Madrid. Starting from their opinions, the research has experimented the use of a metacognitive model, the Know-Want-Learn method, originally designed by Ogle in 1986, to verify if it could be useful for students to better self-assess themselves, using feedback and more active participation. Although the sample is not representative of the higher education population, it is large enough to allow reasonable reflections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Content Analysis of Educational Materials on Radiation and Exhibits in the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster Memorial Museum KWL AS A POSSIBLE MODEL TO CONNECT SELF-ASSESSMENT AND FEEDBACK: THE STUDENTS’ VIEW ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING IN THE DIGITAL AGE: CASE STUDY AT THE SOUTHEAST EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY Language Diversity and Language Policy in Education in Nigeria – A Critical Review Learning through guided imagery: A comprehensive teachers’ guide for a balanced approach in preschool settings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1