同伴效应、社会关系和腐败:来自中国的证据

Xiangyun Shi
{"title":"同伴效应、社会关系和腐败:来自中国的证据","authors":"Xiangyun Shi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3680738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I provide the first empirical analysis on peer effects in corruption using observational data. In specifications including fixed effects to control for differences across cities and colleges, and using an instrumental variable approach, I find that hometown and college ties with other officials who have been investigated for corruption are associated with significant reductions in investigation probability. Evidence supports the explanation that when anti-corruption efforts are high, being connected to a corrupt official makes one less willing to engage in corruption for fear of being implicated. Such act of ``drawing the line against the `problematic' politicians'' is deeply rooted in contemporary Chinese political culture. I structurally estimate a networked game-theoretic model, and the estimates also indicate that such spillover of investigations is the major mechanism at play. Counterfactual analysis implies that corruption decreases as the network becomes denser, and as the level of corruption detection or punishment increases.","PeriodicalId":170831,"journal":{"name":"Public Choice: Analysis of Collective Decision-Making eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peer Effects, Social Ties, and Corruption: Evidence From China\",\"authors\":\"Xiangyun Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3680738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, I provide the first empirical analysis on peer effects in corruption using observational data. In specifications including fixed effects to control for differences across cities and colleges, and using an instrumental variable approach, I find that hometown and college ties with other officials who have been investigated for corruption are associated with significant reductions in investigation probability. Evidence supports the explanation that when anti-corruption efforts are high, being connected to a corrupt official makes one less willing to engage in corruption for fear of being implicated. Such act of ``drawing the line against the `problematic' politicians'' is deeply rooted in contemporary Chinese political culture. I structurally estimate a networked game-theoretic model, and the estimates also indicate that such spillover of investigations is the major mechanism at play. Counterfactual analysis implies that corruption decreases as the network becomes denser, and as the level of corruption detection or punishment increases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Choice: Analysis of Collective Decision-Making eJournal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Choice: Analysis of Collective Decision-Making eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3680738\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Choice: Analysis of Collective Decision-Making eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3680738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在本文中,我首次使用观测数据对腐败中的同伴效应进行了实证分析。在包含固定效应以控制城市和大学之间差异的规范中,并使用工具变量方法,我发现家乡和大学与其他因腐败而被调查的官员的关系与调查概率的显着降低相关。证据支持这样一种解释:当反腐败力度加大时,与腐败官员有关联的人会因为害怕被牵连而不太愿意参与腐败。这种“与‘问题’政客划清界限”的行为深深植根于当代中国的政治文化。我从结构上估计了一个网络博弈论模型,估计也表明这种调查的溢出是起作用的主要机制。反事实分析表明,随着网络变得更加密集,腐败侦查或惩罚水平的提高,腐败就会减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Peer Effects, Social Ties, and Corruption: Evidence From China
In this paper, I provide the first empirical analysis on peer effects in corruption using observational data. In specifications including fixed effects to control for differences across cities and colleges, and using an instrumental variable approach, I find that hometown and college ties with other officials who have been investigated for corruption are associated with significant reductions in investigation probability. Evidence supports the explanation that when anti-corruption efforts are high, being connected to a corrupt official makes one less willing to engage in corruption for fear of being implicated. Such act of ``drawing the line against the `problematic' politicians'' is deeply rooted in contemporary Chinese political culture. I structurally estimate a networked game-theoretic model, and the estimates also indicate that such spillover of investigations is the major mechanism at play. Counterfactual analysis implies that corruption decreases as the network becomes denser, and as the level of corruption detection or punishment increases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Violent Conflict and the Strength of Civil Society A Model of Embedded Autonomy and Asymmetric Information Endogenous Networks and Legislative Activity Judicial Independence: Why Does De Facto Diverge from De Jure? Does Ethnic Diversity Always Undermine Pro-Social Behavior? Evidence from a Laboratory Experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1