从印第安人开始:对斯科特·普拉特的本土实用主义的回应

W. Holton
{"title":"从印第安人开始:对斯科特·普拉特的本土实用主义的回应","authors":"W. Holton","doi":"10.1080/1090377032000114688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is going to sound grandiose, but I really think it’s true: the work that Scott Pratt is trying to do in Native Pragmatism is at least as important and valuable as the work that was done in Philadelphia in 1776 and 1787. Not that the authors of either the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution would approve of Pratt’s project. One of the ways by which the Founding Fathers and their descendants have maintained the power they seized in 1776 and secured in 1787 has been by marketing a series of conquest myths. One of these myths depicts Native Americans not only as savage but as insignificant. These myths have been used to justify the rotten treatment Indians have received since Columbus began making slaves of them in 1492. The truth, as numerous scholars have shown, is that Indians and other oppressed Americans could sometimes be the masters not only of their own destiny but of their masters’ destiny as well. To cite only the most remarkable of these arguments, Sally Wagner showed that in the middle of the nineteenth century, when white Americans’ racism against Indians was at its height, some whites—feminists—saw some Indians— Iroquois wives—as role models, since they had the right to own property, get divorced, and, if they did divorce, keep custody of their kids. They even played an important political role, which helped inspire Elizabeth Cady Stanton to make the most outrageous of the demands in the declaration she drew up in Seneca Falls: for the right to vote. And now Scott Pratt has set himself the even tougher task of tracing the impact of Indian ideas across several generations. Pratt’s mission reminded me in some ways of Lewis and Clark’s search for a route to Oregon, where Pratt makes his home today. As they left St. Louis in May 1804, Lewis and Clark knew the first thing they had to do was to find the source of the Missouri River, the arm of the river that would take them furthest west. As we all know, one reason they succeeded was that they acquired an Indian guide, Sacajawea. In Native Pragmatism, Scott Pratt seeks the source of American Pragmatism, and he proposes that we will never find it unless we, too, become willing to hire Indian guides. I have to preface my analysis of the book by confessing to you just how little I know","PeriodicalId":431617,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy & Geography","volume":"166 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Starting with the Indians: A response to Scott Pratt's Native Pragmatism\",\"authors\":\"W. Holton\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1090377032000114688\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This is going to sound grandiose, but I really think it’s true: the work that Scott Pratt is trying to do in Native Pragmatism is at least as important and valuable as the work that was done in Philadelphia in 1776 and 1787. Not that the authors of either the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution would approve of Pratt’s project. One of the ways by which the Founding Fathers and their descendants have maintained the power they seized in 1776 and secured in 1787 has been by marketing a series of conquest myths. One of these myths depicts Native Americans not only as savage but as insignificant. These myths have been used to justify the rotten treatment Indians have received since Columbus began making slaves of them in 1492. The truth, as numerous scholars have shown, is that Indians and other oppressed Americans could sometimes be the masters not only of their own destiny but of their masters’ destiny as well. To cite only the most remarkable of these arguments, Sally Wagner showed that in the middle of the nineteenth century, when white Americans’ racism against Indians was at its height, some whites—feminists—saw some Indians— Iroquois wives—as role models, since they had the right to own property, get divorced, and, if they did divorce, keep custody of their kids. They even played an important political role, which helped inspire Elizabeth Cady Stanton to make the most outrageous of the demands in the declaration she drew up in Seneca Falls: for the right to vote. And now Scott Pratt has set himself the even tougher task of tracing the impact of Indian ideas across several generations. Pratt’s mission reminded me in some ways of Lewis and Clark’s search for a route to Oregon, where Pratt makes his home today. As they left St. Louis in May 1804, Lewis and Clark knew the first thing they had to do was to find the source of the Missouri River, the arm of the river that would take them furthest west. As we all know, one reason they succeeded was that they acquired an Indian guide, Sacajawea. In Native Pragmatism, Scott Pratt seeks the source of American Pragmatism, and he proposes that we will never find it unless we, too, become willing to hire Indian guides. I have to preface my analysis of the book by confessing to you just how little I know\",\"PeriodicalId\":431617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophy & Geography\",\"volume\":\"166 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophy & Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1090377032000114688\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy & Geography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1090377032000114688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这听起来很夸张,但我真的认为这是真的:斯科特·普拉特在《本土实用主义》中所做的工作至少与1776年和1787年在费城所做的工作一样重要和有价值。《独立宣言》和《宪法》的起草者都不会赞同普拉特的计划。开国元勋们和他们的后代保持他们在1776年夺取并在1787年获得的权力的方法之一就是推销一系列征服神话。其中一个神话不仅把印第安人描绘成野蛮人,还把他们描绘成无足轻重的人。自1492年哥伦布开始奴役印第安人以来,这些神话一直被用来为印第安人所受到的恶劣待遇辩护。正如许多学者所表明的那样,事实是,印第安人和其他受压迫的美国人有时不仅可以主宰自己的命运,也可以主宰他们主人的命运。这里只举其中最引人注目的一个例子,莎莉·瓦格纳指出,在19世纪中期,当美国白人对印第安人的种族主义达到顶峰时,一些白人女权主义者把一些印第安人——易洛魁人的妻子——视为榜样,因为她们有权拥有财产,有权离婚,如果离婚了,还有权拥有孩子的监护权。她们甚至发挥了重要的政治作用,这促使伊丽莎白·卡迪·斯坦顿在塞内卡瀑布起草的宣言中提出了最离谱的要求:争取投票权。现在,斯科特·普拉特(Scott Pratt)给自己设定了一项更艰巨的任务,即追踪几代人之间印第安人思想的影响。普拉特的任务在某些方面让我想起了刘易斯和克拉克寻找通往俄勒冈州的路线,普拉特现在就住在那里。当他们在1804年5月离开圣路易斯时,刘易斯和克拉克知道他们要做的第一件事就是找到密苏里河的源头,这条河的支流将把他们带到最西边。我们都知道,他们成功的一个原因是他们找到了一个印第安向导,萨卡加维亚。在《本土实用主义》一书中,斯科特·普拉特寻找美国实用主义的根源,他提出,除非我们也愿意雇佣印第安向导,否则我们永远找不到它。在分析这本书之前,我必须先向你们承认,我所知甚少
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Starting with the Indians: A response to Scott Pratt's Native Pragmatism
This is going to sound grandiose, but I really think it’s true: the work that Scott Pratt is trying to do in Native Pragmatism is at least as important and valuable as the work that was done in Philadelphia in 1776 and 1787. Not that the authors of either the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution would approve of Pratt’s project. One of the ways by which the Founding Fathers and their descendants have maintained the power they seized in 1776 and secured in 1787 has been by marketing a series of conquest myths. One of these myths depicts Native Americans not only as savage but as insignificant. These myths have been used to justify the rotten treatment Indians have received since Columbus began making slaves of them in 1492. The truth, as numerous scholars have shown, is that Indians and other oppressed Americans could sometimes be the masters not only of their own destiny but of their masters’ destiny as well. To cite only the most remarkable of these arguments, Sally Wagner showed that in the middle of the nineteenth century, when white Americans’ racism against Indians was at its height, some whites—feminists—saw some Indians— Iroquois wives—as role models, since they had the right to own property, get divorced, and, if they did divorce, keep custody of their kids. They even played an important political role, which helped inspire Elizabeth Cady Stanton to make the most outrageous of the demands in the declaration she drew up in Seneca Falls: for the right to vote. And now Scott Pratt has set himself the even tougher task of tracing the impact of Indian ideas across several generations. Pratt’s mission reminded me in some ways of Lewis and Clark’s search for a route to Oregon, where Pratt makes his home today. As they left St. Louis in May 1804, Lewis and Clark knew the first thing they had to do was to find the source of the Missouri River, the arm of the river that would take them furthest west. As we all know, one reason they succeeded was that they acquired an Indian guide, Sacajawea. In Native Pragmatism, Scott Pratt seeks the source of American Pragmatism, and he proposes that we will never find it unless we, too, become willing to hire Indian guides. I have to preface my analysis of the book by confessing to you just how little I know
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The ethics of metropolitan growth: A framework A vindication of the rights of brutes The self-fulfilling prophecies and global inequality Second thoughts on Gedachtes Wohnen In defense of homology and history: A response to Allen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1