{"title":"论为什么效用函数不能产生吉芬商品","authors":"R. Sproule","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1431201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Presently, it is widely accepted that the particular utility function first reported by Wold and Jureen (1953), and later by Weber (1997), is capable of generating a Giffen good. This note challenges this view by showing that this Wold-Jureen (1953) utility function is not well-behaved, and that, as a consequence, it does not satisfy the second-order condition for an interior maximum related to the consumer-maximization problem. In view of this, it is argued here that: (a) not only is this utility function incapable of generating a Giffen good, but by extension (b) the so-called demand functions reported by Weber (1997) are not demand functions.","PeriodicalId":409545,"journal":{"name":"EduRN: Economics Education (ERN) (Topic)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Why the Wold-Juréen (1953) Utility Function Cannot Generate a Giffen Good\",\"authors\":\"R. Sproule\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1431201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Presently, it is widely accepted that the particular utility function first reported by Wold and Jureen (1953), and later by Weber (1997), is capable of generating a Giffen good. This note challenges this view by showing that this Wold-Jureen (1953) utility function is not well-behaved, and that, as a consequence, it does not satisfy the second-order condition for an interior maximum related to the consumer-maximization problem. In view of this, it is argued here that: (a) not only is this utility function incapable of generating a Giffen good, but by extension (b) the so-called demand functions reported by Weber (1997) are not demand functions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":409545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EduRN: Economics Education (ERN) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EduRN: Economics Education (ERN) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1431201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EduRN: Economics Education (ERN) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1431201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
On Why the Wold-Juréen (1953) Utility Function Cannot Generate a Giffen Good
Presently, it is widely accepted that the particular utility function first reported by Wold and Jureen (1953), and later by Weber (1997), is capable of generating a Giffen good. This note challenges this view by showing that this Wold-Jureen (1953) utility function is not well-behaved, and that, as a consequence, it does not satisfy the second-order condition for an interior maximum related to the consumer-maximization problem. In view of this, it is argued here that: (a) not only is this utility function incapable of generating a Giffen good, but by extension (b) the so-called demand functions reported by Weber (1997) are not demand functions.