“站在巨人的肩膀上”创造和管理设计知识

I. Horváth
{"title":"“站在巨人的肩膀上”创造和管理设计知识","authors":"I. Horváth","doi":"10.3233/jid190021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"management in the costume design process: (i) sustainability, (ii) consistency, (iii) convertibility, (iv) immediacy, and (v) shareability. The last article contributed American pair authors, Kim and under the title ’Galois lattices-based formal design concept analysis for crowdsourcing design ‘. The work rests on the three pillars identified in the title. The Galois-lattice is a graphical method of representing knowledge structures. The abstract structure of G-lattice consists of a partially ordered set in which every two elements have a unique supremum (also called a least upper bound or join) and a unique infimum (also called a greatest lower bound or meet). The nodes of G-lattices represent all the possible concepts in a given body of knowledge in the sense that a notion defines a set of individuals or properties with no exceptions or idiosyncrasies. As a recent development, design has become supported by crowdsourcing. The vast knowledge created and contributed by crowds enhances a wide exploration and utilization of design ideas. However, (i) the limited amount of information called ‘scarcity’, (ii) non-guaranteed quality of contributions, and (iii) similar or contradicting contributions made by unspecified participant groups made it difficult to systematically analyze and reuse design concepts. This article presents a formal analysis method for design concepts generated by crowdsourcing design activities. To enable the formal design concept analysis, first a design feature taxonomy was developed by considering crowdsourcing design environment. In this taxonomy, various design features and participant evaluation features were constructed. The Galois lattice-based formal concept analysis was employed as a design concept analysis method. The pivot power case was used to show that the presented method was applicable to a practical crowdsourcing design environment. Finally, precision and recall tests were conducted through a focus group interview and the results from the design analysis without and with the participant evaluation were compared. As a scientific contribution, a formal design analysis method was introduced in this article to represent and extract concepts from crowdsourcing design activities. Since the proposed method can generate concepts from the sparse pieces of data or information, one of the major constraints of crowdsourcing design – namely, limited amount of information - can be eased. This research also showed that setting up","PeriodicalId":342559,"journal":{"name":"J. Integr. Des. Process. Sci.","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creating and Managing Knowledge in Design by 'Standing on The Shoulders of Giants'\",\"authors\":\"I. Horváth\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/jid190021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"management in the costume design process: (i) sustainability, (ii) consistency, (iii) convertibility, (iv) immediacy, and (v) shareability. The last article contributed American pair authors, Kim and under the title ’Galois lattices-based formal design concept analysis for crowdsourcing design ‘. The work rests on the three pillars identified in the title. The Galois-lattice is a graphical method of representing knowledge structures. The abstract structure of G-lattice consists of a partially ordered set in which every two elements have a unique supremum (also called a least upper bound or join) and a unique infimum (also called a greatest lower bound or meet). The nodes of G-lattices represent all the possible concepts in a given body of knowledge in the sense that a notion defines a set of individuals or properties with no exceptions or idiosyncrasies. As a recent development, design has become supported by crowdsourcing. The vast knowledge created and contributed by crowds enhances a wide exploration and utilization of design ideas. However, (i) the limited amount of information called ‘scarcity’, (ii) non-guaranteed quality of contributions, and (iii) similar or contradicting contributions made by unspecified participant groups made it difficult to systematically analyze and reuse design concepts. This article presents a formal analysis method for design concepts generated by crowdsourcing design activities. To enable the formal design concept analysis, first a design feature taxonomy was developed by considering crowdsourcing design environment. In this taxonomy, various design features and participant evaluation features were constructed. The Galois lattice-based formal concept analysis was employed as a design concept analysis method. The pivot power case was used to show that the presented method was applicable to a practical crowdsourcing design environment. Finally, precision and recall tests were conducted through a focus group interview and the results from the design analysis without and with the participant evaluation were compared. As a scientific contribution, a formal design analysis method was introduced in this article to represent and extract concepts from crowdsourcing design activities. Since the proposed method can generate concepts from the sparse pieces of data or information, one of the major constraints of crowdsourcing design – namely, limited amount of information - can be eased. This research also showed that setting up\",\"PeriodicalId\":342559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Integr. Des. Process. Sci.\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Integr. Des. Process. Sci.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/jid190021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Integr. Des. Process. Sci.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/jid190021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

服装设计过程中的管理:(i)可持续性,(ii)一致性,(iii)可兑换性,(iv)即时性,(v)可共享性。上一篇文章由美国两位作者Kim和Kim共同撰写,标题为“基于伽罗瓦格的众包设计形式设计概念分析”。这项工作基于标题中确定的三个支柱。伽罗瓦格是一种表示知识结构的图形方法。g格的抽象结构由一个部分有序集合组成,其中每两个元素都有一个唯一的上限值(也称为最小上界或连接)和一个唯一的下限值(也称为最大下界或会合)。g格的节点代表了给定知识体系中所有可能的概念,在这个意义上,一个概念定义了一组个体或属性,没有例外或特质。作为最近的发展,设计得到了众包的支持。大众创造和贡献的大量知识促进了对设计思想的广泛探索和利用。然而,(i)被称为“稀缺性”的有限信息,(ii)贡献的质量没有保证,以及(iii)未指定的参与者群体做出的类似或相互矛盾的贡献,使得系统地分析和重用设计概念变得困难。本文提出了一种对众包设计活动产生的设计概念进行形式化分析的方法。为了进行正式的设计概念分析,首先考虑了众包设计环境,建立了设计特征分类法。在该分类法中,构建了各种设计特征和参与者评价特征。采用基于伽罗瓦格的形式概念分析作为设计概念分析方法。通过支点功率算例验证了该方法适用于实际的众包设计环境。最后,通过焦点小组访谈进行了准确性和召回率测试,并比较了没有参与者评价和有参与者评价的设计分析结果。作为一项科学贡献,本文引入了一种形式化的设计分析方法来表示和提取众包设计活动中的概念。由于所提出的方法可以从稀疏的数据或信息中生成概念,因此可以缓解众包设计的主要限制之一-即有限的信息量。这项研究还表明,设置
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Creating and Managing Knowledge in Design by 'Standing on The Shoulders of Giants'
management in the costume design process: (i) sustainability, (ii) consistency, (iii) convertibility, (iv) immediacy, and (v) shareability. The last article contributed American pair authors, Kim and under the title ’Galois lattices-based formal design concept analysis for crowdsourcing design ‘. The work rests on the three pillars identified in the title. The Galois-lattice is a graphical method of representing knowledge structures. The abstract structure of G-lattice consists of a partially ordered set in which every two elements have a unique supremum (also called a least upper bound or join) and a unique infimum (also called a greatest lower bound or meet). The nodes of G-lattices represent all the possible concepts in a given body of knowledge in the sense that a notion defines a set of individuals or properties with no exceptions or idiosyncrasies. As a recent development, design has become supported by crowdsourcing. The vast knowledge created and contributed by crowds enhances a wide exploration and utilization of design ideas. However, (i) the limited amount of information called ‘scarcity’, (ii) non-guaranteed quality of contributions, and (iii) similar or contradicting contributions made by unspecified participant groups made it difficult to systematically analyze and reuse design concepts. This article presents a formal analysis method for design concepts generated by crowdsourcing design activities. To enable the formal design concept analysis, first a design feature taxonomy was developed by considering crowdsourcing design environment. In this taxonomy, various design features and participant evaluation features were constructed. The Galois lattice-based formal concept analysis was employed as a design concept analysis method. The pivot power case was used to show that the presented method was applicable to a practical crowdsourcing design environment. Finally, precision and recall tests were conducted through a focus group interview and the results from the design analysis without and with the participant evaluation were compared. As a scientific contribution, a formal design analysis method was introduced in this article to represent and extract concepts from crowdsourcing design activities. Since the proposed method can generate concepts from the sparse pieces of data or information, one of the major constraints of crowdsourcing design – namely, limited amount of information - can be eased. This research also showed that setting up
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The need for innovations in healthcare systems using patient experience and advancing information technology An Investigation into the Development of Convergence Engineering Digital Engineering Transformation with Trustworthy AI towards Industry 4.0: Emerging Paradigm Shifts Footsteps Towards a Transdisciplinary Design and Process Science THE RELATIVISTIC OBSERVER: Consequences of a Linear Expansion of Spacetime
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1