{"title":"从Paul Ricoeur的解释学角度解读《阿布丁·纳塔》(《古兰经ānic教育解释》)","authors":"Mohammed Rosidin","doi":"10.1163/22321969-12340056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis paper analyzes Abuddin Nata’s book of tafsīr tarbawī (Qurʾānic educational interpretation) entitled Tafsīr Ayat-Ayat Pendidikan (“Interpretation of Educational Verses”) on the basis of Paul Ricoeur’s ideas of hermeneutics. It does so through its main postulation of distanciation and appropriation through the dialectics of understanding or comprehension (verstehen) and explanation (erklären), using two primary stages: from naïve understanding to explanation through guessing; and from explanation to comprehension (deep understanding) through contextualization. This paper claims that the still contested methodology of tafsīr tarbawī is reflected in the dominance of the author’s subjectivity vis-à-vis the objectivity of the text. Such a claim is based on its minimal distanciation using the original verbal meanings of the Qurʾān, while the appropriation is dominated by the author’s own horizon. The implication is that Tafsīr Ayat-Ayat Pendidikan does not reflect the correct degree of fusion between the text-horizon and the author’s horizon as Paul Ricoeur suggested should be the case.","PeriodicalId":166367,"journal":{"name":"Al-Bayān – Journal of Qurʾān and Ḥadīth Studies","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reading Tafsīr Tarbawī (Qurʾānic Educational Interpretation) of Abuddin Nata from the Perspective of Paul Ricoeur’s Hermeneutics\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Rosidin\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/22321969-12340056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThis paper analyzes Abuddin Nata’s book of tafsīr tarbawī (Qurʾānic educational interpretation) entitled Tafsīr Ayat-Ayat Pendidikan (“Interpretation of Educational Verses”) on the basis of Paul Ricoeur’s ideas of hermeneutics. It does so through its main postulation of distanciation and appropriation through the dialectics of understanding or comprehension (verstehen) and explanation (erklären), using two primary stages: from naïve understanding to explanation through guessing; and from explanation to comprehension (deep understanding) through contextualization. This paper claims that the still contested methodology of tafsīr tarbawī is reflected in the dominance of the author’s subjectivity vis-à-vis the objectivity of the text. Such a claim is based on its minimal distanciation using the original verbal meanings of the Qurʾān, while the appropriation is dominated by the author’s own horizon. The implication is that Tafsīr Ayat-Ayat Pendidikan does not reflect the correct degree of fusion between the text-horizon and the author’s horizon as Paul Ricoeur suggested should be the case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Bayān – Journal of Qurʾān and Ḥadīth Studies\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Bayān – Journal of Qurʾān and Ḥadīth Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/22321969-12340056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Bayān – Journal of Qurʾān and Ḥadīth Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22321969-12340056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
本文以Paul Ricoeur的解释学思想为基础,分析了Abuddin Nata的《教育经文的解释》(tafs r Ayat-Ayat Pendidikan)。它通过理解或理解(verstehen)和解释(erklären)的辩证法的主要假设,即距离和挪用来实现这一点,并使用了两个主要阶段:从naïve理解到通过猜测解释;通过语境化从解释到理解(深刻理解)。本文认为,仍有争议的塔夫斯基·塔尔巴乌的方法论反映在作者主观性相对于-à-vis文本客观性的主导地位上。这样的主张是基于它使用古兰经ān的原始口头意义的最小距离,而占用是由作者自己的视界主导的。这意味着tafs - r Ayat-Ayat Pendidikan并没有像Paul Ricoeur建议的那样反映文本视界和作者视界之间的正确融合程度。
Reading Tafsīr Tarbawī (Qurʾānic Educational Interpretation) of Abuddin Nata from the Perspective of Paul Ricoeur’s Hermeneutics
This paper analyzes Abuddin Nata’s book of tafsīr tarbawī (Qurʾānic educational interpretation) entitled Tafsīr Ayat-Ayat Pendidikan (“Interpretation of Educational Verses”) on the basis of Paul Ricoeur’s ideas of hermeneutics. It does so through its main postulation of distanciation and appropriation through the dialectics of understanding or comprehension (verstehen) and explanation (erklären), using two primary stages: from naïve understanding to explanation through guessing; and from explanation to comprehension (deep understanding) through contextualization. This paper claims that the still contested methodology of tafsīr tarbawī is reflected in the dominance of the author’s subjectivity vis-à-vis the objectivity of the text. Such a claim is based on its minimal distanciation using the original verbal meanings of the Qurʾān, while the appropriation is dominated by the author’s own horizon. The implication is that Tafsīr Ayat-Ayat Pendidikan does not reflect the correct degree of fusion between the text-horizon and the author’s horizon as Paul Ricoeur suggested should be the case.