水管理系统的伦理考虑

Water Nepal Pub Date : 2003-01-10 DOI:10.3126/WN.V10I1.90
M. Llamas
{"title":"水管理系统的伦理考虑","authors":"M. Llamas","doi":"10.3126/WN.V10I1.90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Water management decisions have many facets including planning, regulating, designing, construction, operation, maintenance and cost allocation. Decisions might be variously considered wrong or right according to the system of values espoused by a society. Many consider that universal ethical principles exist, such as those embodied in the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights of 1948. It is considered that practical ethical principles in water activities evolve from the concepts of human dignity and human sociability. Most water problems are caused by a lack of equilibrium between its utilitarian (economic) value which is connected to human sociability and its intangible or sacred values which are related to human dignity. The application of these principles may generate legitimate but different practical solutions because of the complexity of water uses (urban, irrigation, energy etc.) and the great variability of water needs and values, physical and social, geographical and historical. The solidarity principle should inform the relations between upstream and downstream water users and between countries in international watersheds. It also is the basis for the concept of sustainability, i.e. solidarity towards future generations. The subsidiary principle recommends that decisions should be made at the lowest social level compatible with the common good. Coordination among family groups, municipalities, countries, states and federal institutions is crucial but not easy to achieve. The participation of all stakeholders is deemed a must but in practice the application of this principle face may serious obstacles because many stakeholders are poorly educated and informed. The main obstacles to the implementation of ethical principles in water management are described under the following concepts: ignorance, arrogance, institutional inertia and corruption. Case histories from Spain, the most arid country in Europe, will be shown as examples of ethical-or unethical-solutions. \n \n Water Nepal Vol.9-10, No.1-2, 2003, pp.13-27","PeriodicalId":224207,"journal":{"name":"Water Nepal","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical Considerations in Water Management Systems\",\"authors\":\"M. Llamas\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/WN.V10I1.90\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Water management decisions have many facets including planning, regulating, designing, construction, operation, maintenance and cost allocation. Decisions might be variously considered wrong or right according to the system of values espoused by a society. Many consider that universal ethical principles exist, such as those embodied in the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights of 1948. It is considered that practical ethical principles in water activities evolve from the concepts of human dignity and human sociability. Most water problems are caused by a lack of equilibrium between its utilitarian (economic) value which is connected to human sociability and its intangible or sacred values which are related to human dignity. The application of these principles may generate legitimate but different practical solutions because of the complexity of water uses (urban, irrigation, energy etc.) and the great variability of water needs and values, physical and social, geographical and historical. The solidarity principle should inform the relations between upstream and downstream water users and between countries in international watersheds. It also is the basis for the concept of sustainability, i.e. solidarity towards future generations. The subsidiary principle recommends that decisions should be made at the lowest social level compatible with the common good. Coordination among family groups, municipalities, countries, states and federal institutions is crucial but not easy to achieve. The participation of all stakeholders is deemed a must but in practice the application of this principle face may serious obstacles because many stakeholders are poorly educated and informed. The main obstacles to the implementation of ethical principles in water management are described under the following concepts: ignorance, arrogance, institutional inertia and corruption. Case histories from Spain, the most arid country in Europe, will be shown as examples of ethical-or unethical-solutions. \\n \\n Water Nepal Vol.9-10, No.1-2, 2003, pp.13-27\",\"PeriodicalId\":224207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Nepal\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Nepal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/WN.V10I1.90\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Nepal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/WN.V10I1.90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

水管理决策涉及多个方面,包括规划、调节、设计、建设、运营、维护和成本分配。根据一个社会所支持的价值体系,决定可能被不同地认为是对是错。许多人认为存在普遍的道德原则,例如1948年《联合国人权宣言》所体现的原则。人们认为,水活动中的实际伦理原则是从人的尊严和人的社会性的概念演变而来的。大多数水问题都是由于与人类社交有关的功利(经济)价值与与人类尊严有关的无形或神圣价值之间缺乏平衡造成的。由于水的使用(城市用水、灌溉用水、能源用水等)的复杂性以及水的需求和价值(自然的和社会的、地理的和历史的)的巨大变化,应用这些原则可能产生合法但不同的实际解决办法。团结原则应反映上下游用水用户之间以及国际流域内国家之间的关系。它也是可持续性概念的基础,即对子孙后代的团结。附属原则建议应在符合共同利益的最低社会一级作出决定。家庭团体、市政当局、国家、州和联邦机构之间的协调至关重要,但要做到这一点并不容易。所有利益相关者的参与被认为是必须的,但在实践中,这一原则的应用可能面临严重障碍,因为许多利益相关者缺乏教育和信息。在水管理中执行道德原则的主要障碍是以下几个概念:无知、傲慢、体制惰性和腐败。西班牙是欧洲最干旱的国家,它的案例历史将作为道德或不道德的解决方案的例子。《水利工程》,2003,第1-2期,第13-27页
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ethical Considerations in Water Management Systems
Water management decisions have many facets including planning, regulating, designing, construction, operation, maintenance and cost allocation. Decisions might be variously considered wrong or right according to the system of values espoused by a society. Many consider that universal ethical principles exist, such as those embodied in the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights of 1948. It is considered that practical ethical principles in water activities evolve from the concepts of human dignity and human sociability. Most water problems are caused by a lack of equilibrium between its utilitarian (economic) value which is connected to human sociability and its intangible or sacred values which are related to human dignity. The application of these principles may generate legitimate but different practical solutions because of the complexity of water uses (urban, irrigation, energy etc.) and the great variability of water needs and values, physical and social, geographical and historical. The solidarity principle should inform the relations between upstream and downstream water users and between countries in international watersheds. It also is the basis for the concept of sustainability, i.e. solidarity towards future generations. The subsidiary principle recommends that decisions should be made at the lowest social level compatible with the common good. Coordination among family groups, municipalities, countries, states and federal institutions is crucial but not easy to achieve. The participation of all stakeholders is deemed a must but in practice the application of this principle face may serious obstacles because many stakeholders are poorly educated and informed. The main obstacles to the implementation of ethical principles in water management are described under the following concepts: ignorance, arrogance, institutional inertia and corruption. Case histories from Spain, the most arid country in Europe, will be shown as examples of ethical-or unethical-solutions. Water Nepal Vol.9-10, No.1-2, 2003, pp.13-27
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ensuring Water Security through Rainwater Harvesting: A Case Study of Sargasan, Gujarat Water: Perspectives, Issues, Concerns. By Ramaswamy R. Iver. Sage Publications of India Pvt. Ltd. 2003 Study of Wastewater Irrigation in the Kathmandu Valley Water Sanitation and Human Settlements: Crisis, Opportunity or Management? Tubewell Capitalism: Groundwater Development and Agrarian Change in Gujarat by Navroz K. Dubash. Oxford University Press, New Delhi, 2002.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1