小说原理:印尼工业设计权利保护悖论

Pahala Sirait
{"title":"小说原理:印尼工业设计权利保护悖论","authors":"Pahala Sirait","doi":"10.55809/tora.v7i2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Phrase \"significantly equal\" isn’t regulated in Law 31 of 2000 about Industrial Design, it’s cause in multiple interpretations related to the meaning of \"novelty\". The novelty element should refer to TRIPs Agreement, which isn’t the same or not similar to the previous disclosure. This study uses a normative juridical method, with a theoretical approach that is relevant to industrial design protection. This is what underlies research to determine the effectiveness of industrial design rights protection based on the novelty principle, and how to formulate law of industrial design in the future. \nKeywords: Industrial Design Rights, Novelty, Protection by Law","PeriodicalId":355257,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum to-ra : Hukum Untuk Mengatur dan Melindungi Masyarakat","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NOVELTY PRINCIPLE: PARADOKS PROTEKSI HAK DESAIN INDUSTRI DI INDONESIA\",\"authors\":\"Pahala Sirait\",\"doi\":\"10.55809/tora.v7i2.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Phrase \\\"significantly equal\\\" isn’t regulated in Law 31 of 2000 about Industrial Design, it’s cause in multiple interpretations related to the meaning of \\\"novelty\\\". The novelty element should refer to TRIPs Agreement, which isn’t the same or not similar to the previous disclosure. This study uses a normative juridical method, with a theoretical approach that is relevant to industrial design protection. This is what underlies research to determine the effectiveness of industrial design rights protection based on the novelty principle, and how to formulate law of industrial design in the future. \\nKeywords: Industrial Design Rights, Novelty, Protection by Law\",\"PeriodicalId\":355257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Hukum to-ra : Hukum Untuk Mengatur dan Melindungi Masyarakat\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Hukum to-ra : Hukum Untuk Mengatur dan Melindungi Masyarakat\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55809/tora.v7i2.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum to-ra : Hukum Untuk Mengatur dan Melindungi Masyarakat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55809/tora.v7i2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2000年第31号《工业设计法》没有对“显著相等”一词进行规定,这是由于与“新颖性”的含义有关的多种解释。新颖性要素应参考TRIPs协议,该协议与之前的披露不相同或不相似。本研究采用规范的司法方法,结合与工业品外观设计保护相关的理论方法。这是研究基于新颖性原则的工业品外观设计权利保护有效性,以及未来如何制定工业品外观设计法律的基础所在。关键词:工业品外观设计权,新颖性,法律保护
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NOVELTY PRINCIPLE: PARADOKS PROTEKSI HAK DESAIN INDUSTRI DI INDONESIA
Phrase "significantly equal" isn’t regulated in Law 31 of 2000 about Industrial Design, it’s cause in multiple interpretations related to the meaning of "novelty". The novelty element should refer to TRIPs Agreement, which isn’t the same or not similar to the previous disclosure. This study uses a normative juridical method, with a theoretical approach that is relevant to industrial design protection. This is what underlies research to determine the effectiveness of industrial design rights protection based on the novelty principle, and how to formulate law of industrial design in the future. Keywords: Industrial Design Rights, Novelty, Protection by Law
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
KONSEP MEKANISME PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA MELALUI SMALL CLAIM COURT SUATU STUDI PERBANDINGAN DAN IMPLEMENTASINYA DI INDONESIA POLEMIK MALPRAKTIK DAN RISIKO MEDIK PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL KOMUNAL DI SULAWESI UTARA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP ANAK PELAKU TERORISME DI INDONESIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA Tanggung Jawab Hukum Rumah Sakit Dalam Pelayanan Kesehatan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1