The demand of society seeking justice is for simple, speedy, and cost-effective dispute resolution. This is the foundation for the establishment of the principle of justice in Indonesia in accordance with Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning the Judicial Power, namely the principles of simple, speedy, and cost-effective justice. This is due to the fact that dispute resolution through litigation often fails to satisfy the parties involved due to its relatively lengthy process, complexity, and high costs. Meanwhile, dispute resolution outside the court (non-litigation) lacks executive power because it is solely contractual. The mechanism for resolving disputes through the Small Claims Court was initially known and practiced in countries with a common law system, eventually adopted by countries with a civil law system. In Indonesia, it was translated and implemented through the examination of simple lawsuits in accordance with the Supreme Court Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2015 concerning Procedures for Filing Simple Lawsuits, as amended and perfected by the Supreme Court Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4 of 2019 concerning Amendments to the Supreme Court Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2015 concerning Procedures for Filing Simple Lawsuits.
{"title":"KONSEP MEKANISME PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA MELALUI SMALL CLAIM COURT SUATU STUDI PERBANDINGAN DAN IMPLEMENTASINYA DI INDONESIA","authors":"Hulman Panjaitan","doi":"10.55809/tora.v9i3.294","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55809/tora.v9i3.294","url":null,"abstract":"The demand of society seeking justice is for simple, speedy, and cost-effective dispute resolution. This is the foundation for the establishment of the principle of justice in Indonesia in accordance with Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning the Judicial Power, namely the principles of simple, speedy, and cost-effective justice. This is due to the fact that dispute resolution through litigation often fails to satisfy the parties involved due to its relatively lengthy process, complexity, and high costs. Meanwhile, dispute resolution outside the court (non-litigation) lacks executive power because it is solely contractual. The mechanism for resolving disputes through the Small Claims Court was initially known and practiced in countries with a common law system, eventually adopted by countries with a civil law system. In Indonesia, it was translated and implemented through the examination of simple lawsuits in accordance with the Supreme Court Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2015 concerning Procedures for Filing Simple Lawsuits, as amended and perfected by the Supreme Court Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4 of 2019 concerning Amendments to the Supreme Court Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2015 concerning Procedures for Filing Simple Lawsuits.","PeriodicalId":355257,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum to-ra : Hukum Untuk Mengatur dan Melindungi Masyarakat","volume":"91 27","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139131999","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The term negligence is part of professional incompetence, from a health perspective, the term negligence is called malpractice, meaning bad practice, giving rise to claims that go to court. Whereas, medical risks are unexpected events, such as surgery or other medical procedures, which contain medical risks which can actually become an obstacle to medical practice. Society finds it difficult to differentiate between malpractice and medical risk, so it is important to share this knowledge with legal officials and society, so that it does not become a polemic throughout the ages.
{"title":"POLEMIK MALPRAKTIK DAN RISIKO MEDIK","authors":"R. Siregar","doi":"10.55809/tora.v9i3.293","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55809/tora.v9i3.293","url":null,"abstract":"The term negligence is part of professional incompetence, from a health perspective, the term negligence is called malpractice, meaning bad practice, giving rise to claims that go to court. Whereas, medical risks are unexpected events, such as surgery or other medical procedures, which contain medical risks which can actually become an obstacle to medical practice. Society finds it difficult to differentiate between malpractice and medical risk, so it is important to share this knowledge with legal officials and society, so that it does not become a polemic throughout the ages.","PeriodicalId":355257,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum to-ra : Hukum Untuk Mengatur dan Melindungi Masyarakat","volume":" 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139136157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tujuan dari penelitian kali ini guna mengetahui tanggung jawab hukum rumah sakit dalam pelayanan kesehatan. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif dan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif bersifat library research (kajian kepustakaan). Sumber data yang digunakan yaitu bahan hukum primer dari Undang-undang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Undang-undang terkait rumah sakit merupakan sarana pengawasan agar pelayanan kesehatan dari rumah sakit dapat tercapai. Bentuk tanggungjawab rumah sakit ketika menyebabkan kerugian pada pasien terdapat pada Undang-undang Republik Indonesia tentang Rumah Sakit Pasal 46 yaitu pertama rumah sakit bertanggungjawab penuh kelalaian yang diakibatkan oleh pihak rumah sakit, kedua ketika tidak ada kelalaian yang diakibatkan pihak rumah sakit maka tidak akan ada pertanggungjawabannya, ketiga rumah sakit tidak bertanggungjawab terhadap kelalaian yang dilakukan di rumah sakit.
{"title":"Tanggung Jawab Hukum Rumah Sakit Dalam Pelayanan Kesehatan","authors":"Fills Prayoga, Fifik Wiryani, Nasser","doi":"10.55809/tora.v9i3.264","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55809/tora.v9i3.264","url":null,"abstract":"Tujuan dari penelitian kali ini guna mengetahui tanggung jawab hukum rumah sakit dalam pelayanan kesehatan. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif dan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif bersifat library research (kajian kepustakaan). Sumber data yang digunakan yaitu bahan hukum primer dari Undang-undang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Undang-undang terkait rumah sakit merupakan sarana pengawasan agar pelayanan kesehatan dari rumah sakit dapat tercapai. Bentuk tanggungjawab rumah sakit ketika menyebabkan kerugian pada pasien terdapat pada Undang-undang Republik Indonesia tentang Rumah Sakit Pasal 46 yaitu pertama rumah sakit bertanggungjawab penuh kelalaian yang diakibatkan oleh pihak rumah sakit, kedua ketika tidak ada kelalaian yang diakibatkan pihak rumah sakit maka tidak akan ada pertanggungjawabannya, ketiga rumah sakit tidak bertanggungjawab terhadap kelalaian yang dilakukan di rumah sakit.","PeriodicalId":355257,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum to-ra : Hukum Untuk Mengatur dan Melindungi Masyarakat","volume":"55 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138946296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Fenia Stepanie Gabriella Lowing, Emma V.T Senewe, Devy K.G Sondakh
Children of terrorism cannot be considered as perpetrators of crimes, but victims of crime, victims of terrorism networks, victims of doctrine, exploitation of thoughts, propaganda from parents or adults around them so they must be protected specifically. Children like this should not be imprisoned, but must be educated, given counseling, rehabilitated and social assistance. Judging from the Law on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, the imposition of death penalty and life imprisonment does not apply to perpetrators of criminal acts of terrorism who are under 18 years of age or who are still classified as children. The state is also obliged to provide special protection for children who commit acts of terrorism. As for the legal arrangements for child perpetrators of terrorism from the perspective of human rights in Indonesia, it is regulated in several national regulations. Keywords: child of terrorism, human rights
{"title":"PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP ANAK PELAKU TERORISME DI INDONESIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA","authors":"Fenia Stepanie Gabriella Lowing, Emma V.T Senewe, Devy K.G Sondakh","doi":"10.55809/tora.v9i3.249","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55809/tora.v9i3.249","url":null,"abstract":"Children of terrorism cannot be considered as perpetrators of crimes, but victims of crime, victims of terrorism networks, victims of doctrine, exploitation of thoughts, propaganda from parents or adults around them so they must be protected specifically. Children like this should not be imprisoned, but must be educated, given counseling, rehabilitated and social assistance. Judging from the Law on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, the imposition of death penalty and life imprisonment does not apply to perpetrators of criminal acts of terrorism who are under 18 years of age or who are still classified as children. The state is also obliged to provide special protection for children who commit acts of terrorism. As for the legal arrangements for child perpetrators of terrorism from the perspective of human rights in Indonesia, it is regulated in several national regulations. \u0000 \u0000Keywords: child of terrorism, human rights","PeriodicalId":355257,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum to-ra : Hukum Untuk Mengatur dan Melindungi Masyarakat","volume":"7 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138944785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Friend H. Anis, Ollij Anneke Kereh, Karel Yossi Umboh
This research aims to determine and analyze the substance of the regulation of communal intellectual property rights in Indonesia and to determine and analyze the role of Regional Government in providing legal protection for communal intellectual property rights in North Sulawesi. The method used in this research is a normative legal research method which uses a statutory approach to examine the regulation of communal intellectual property rights and an empirical method to determine the role of Regional Government in providing protection for Communal Intellectual Property Rights in North Sulawesi. Data analysis uses the content analysis method for primary and secondary legal materials, while data obtained through interviews uses qualitative data analysis. The results of the research show that the regulation of Communal Intellectual Property includes several regulations, namely Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2013 concerning Ratification of the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Haring of Benefits Arising from Their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity, Law- Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright, Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications. The role of the regional government of North Sulawesi Province and Regency/City in providing protection for Communal IPR by carrying out registration which includes Traditional Cultural Expressions and Traditional Knowledge, while Indications of Origin and Geographical Indications as well as Genetic Resources have not yet been registered. This research concludes the Legal Regulation of Communal Intellectual Property It has not been regulated in a specific regulation but is still spread across several laws and regulations, while the role of Regional Government shows that not all are actively paying attention to protecting Communal IPR, which is measured by the number of Communal IPR registered and those currently in the registration process.
{"title":"PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL KOMUNAL DI SULAWESI UTARA","authors":"Friend H. Anis, Ollij Anneke Kereh, Karel Yossi Umboh","doi":"10.55809/tora.v9i3.281","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55809/tora.v9i3.281","url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to determine and analyze the substance of the regulation of communal intellectual property rights in Indonesia and to determine and analyze the role of Regional Government in providing legal protection for communal intellectual property rights in North Sulawesi. The method used in this research is a normative legal research method which uses a statutory approach to examine the regulation of communal intellectual property rights and an empirical method to determine the role of Regional Government in providing protection for Communal Intellectual Property Rights in North Sulawesi. Data analysis uses the content analysis method for primary and secondary legal materials, while data obtained through interviews uses qualitative data analysis. The results of the research show that the regulation of Communal Intellectual Property includes several regulations, namely Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2013 concerning Ratification of the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Haring of Benefits Arising from Their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity, Law- Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright, Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications. The role of the regional government of North Sulawesi Province and Regency/City in providing protection for Communal IPR by carrying out registration which includes Traditional Cultural Expressions and Traditional Knowledge, while Indications of Origin and Geographical Indications as well as Genetic Resources have not yet been registered. This research concludes the Legal Regulation of Communal Intellectual Property It has not been regulated in a specific regulation but is still spread across several laws and regulations, while the role of Regional Government shows that not all are actively paying attention to protecting Communal IPR, which is measured by the number of Communal IPR registered and those currently in the registration process.","PeriodicalId":355257,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum to-ra : Hukum Untuk Mengatur dan Melindungi Masyarakat","volume":"20 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138944657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII-2020 states that Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation is conditionally unconstitutional. This is the basis for the government to take action by establishing Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 to replace Law Number 11 of 2020. However, the action taken by the government has drawn a lot of criticism from the public because the government is considered not careful and too hasty in taking action by establishing government regulations in lieu of the law. Consider whether the government takes appropriate action by looking comprehensively at the presence or absence of force crunch which is the basis for the establishment of government regulations in lieu of law in accordance with Article 22 Paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution.
{"title":"Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 Tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 Tentang Cipta Kerja","authors":"David Hariadi, Hesti Wulan, Sonya Claudia Siwu","doi":"10.55809/tora.v9i3.276","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55809/tora.v9i3.276","url":null,"abstract":"Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII-2020 states that Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation is conditionally unconstitutional. This is the basis for the government to take action by establishing Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 to replace Law Number 11 of 2020. However, the action taken by the government has drawn a lot of criticism from the public because the government is considered not careful and too hasty in taking action by establishing government regulations in lieu of the law. Consider whether the government takes appropriate action by looking comprehensively at the presence or absence of force crunch which is the basis for the establishment of government regulations in lieu of law in accordance with Article 22 Paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution.","PeriodicalId":355257,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum to-ra : Hukum Untuk Mengatur dan Melindungi Masyarakat","volume":"22 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138947778","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Karel Yossi Umboh, Friend Henry Anis, Ollij Anneke Kereh
This research was carried out with the aim of knowing and analyzing the legal regulations for foreign investment employing foreign workers in Indonesia and the application of the law regarding the use of foreign workers in North Sulawesi. The method used in this research is a normative legal research method which uses a statutory approach to study the legal regulation of foreign workers and an empirical method to determine the application of foreign labor laws. The research results show that the regulation of foreign workers in Indonesia is contained in Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Employment and its derivative regulations and is also contained in the Job Creation Law as regulated in Law No. 6 of 2023. In the Employment Law, provisions for foreign workers are contained in Article 42 to 45. Several provisions regulate that every employer who employs foreign workers is required to have written permission from the Minister or appointed official. Foreign workers can be employed in Indonesia only in an employment relationship for certain positions and certain times. The implementation of the law regarding the use of foreign workers in North Sulawesi is carried out by several agencies, namely those at the center, in this case the Ministry of Manpower, as well as agencies in the regions, namely the Manpower Service and the Immigration Office..
{"title":"KAJIAN YURIDIS PENANAMAN MODAL ASING YANG MEMPEKERJAKAN TENAGA KERJA ASING BERDASARKAN HUKUM KETENAGAKERJAAN DI INDONESIA","authors":"Karel Yossi Umboh, Friend Henry Anis, Ollij Anneke Kereh","doi":"10.55809/tora.v9i3.283","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55809/tora.v9i3.283","url":null,"abstract":"This research was carried out with the aim of knowing and analyzing the legal regulations for foreign investment employing foreign workers in Indonesia and the application of the law regarding the use of foreign workers in North Sulawesi. The method used in this research is a normative legal research method which uses a statutory approach to study the legal regulation of foreign workers and an empirical method to determine the application of foreign labor laws. \u0000The research results show that the regulation of foreign workers in Indonesia is contained in Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Employment and its derivative regulations and is also contained in the Job Creation Law as regulated in Law No. 6 of 2023. In the Employment Law, provisions for foreign workers are contained in Article 42 to 45. Several provisions regulate that every employer who employs foreign workers is required to have written permission from the Minister or appointed official. Foreign workers can be employed in Indonesia only in an employment relationship for certain positions and certain times. The implementation of the law regarding the use of foreign workers in North Sulawesi is carried out by several agencies, namely those at the center, in this case the Ministry of Manpower, as well as agencies in the regions, namely the Manpower Service and the Immigration Office..","PeriodicalId":355257,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum to-ra : Hukum Untuk Mengatur dan Melindungi Masyarakat","volume":"12 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138947206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Arbitrase diperkenalkan dalam organisasi World Trade Organization pada Pasal 25 dari Dispute Settlement Understanding, sebagai salah satu jalan penyelesaian sengketa yang bisa ditempuh para pihak. Penelitian ini membahas mengenai bagaimana arbitrase dalam Dispute Settlement Understanding dapat dipergunakan untuk menyelesaikan proses sengketa perdagangan internasional di tahap banding, dan bagaimana implikasi dan tantangan dalam berjalannya arbitrase sebagai alternatif penyelesaian sengketa perdagangan internasional di tahap banding. Metode penelitian yang dipergunakan adalah non doktrinal, dengan mengolah dan menganalisis bahan hukum seperti perjanjian internasional, putusan dari lembaga penyelesaian sengketa internasional dan peraturan perundang-undangan terkait. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Pasal 25 DSU pada dasarnya menekankan adanya objek sengketa dari arbitrase yang ditafsirkan secara luas, yakni sengketa yang dapat didefinisikan oleh para pihak, sehingga forum arbitrase dimungkinkan untuk dipergunakan sebagai mekanisme banding. Secara sosiologis, urgensi adanya arbitrase di tahap banding adalah karena adanya pemblokiran penambahan anggota di AB, yang menyebabkan AB tidak dapat memproses perkara yang masuk dari para pihak. Arbitrase ini memberikan suatu terobosan hukum baru dan perjanjian turunan berupa terbentuknya Multi Party Interim Appeal Arbitration, namun memiliki tantangannya tersendiri, seperti permasalahan validitas dari lembaga arbitrase sendiri dan dimungkinkannya putusan arbitrase ditolak eksekusinya oleh hukum nasional. Kata Kunci: Arbitrase; Banding; Sengketa Perdagangan Internasional; WTO. Arbitration is introduced in the World Trade Organization in Article 25 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding, as one of the dispute resolution avenues that parties can pursue. This research discusses how arbitration in the Dispute Settlement Understanding can be used to resolve international trade dispute processes at the appeal stage, and what are the implications and challenges in the operation of arbitration as an alternative to international trade dispute resolution at the appeal stage. The research method used is non-doctrinal, by processing and analyzing legal materials such as international agreements, decisions from international dispute settlement institutions and related laws and regulations. The results of this study show that Article 25 of the DSU basically emphasizes the existence of an object of dispute from arbitration which is interpreted broadly, namely disputes that can be defined by the parties, so that the arbitration forum is possible to be used as an appeal mechanism. Sociologically, the urgency of arbitration at the appeal stage is due to the blocking of additional members in the AB, which causes the AB to be unable to process incoming cases from the parties. This arbitration provides a new legal breakthrough and a derivative agreement in the form of the establishment of Multi Party Interim Appeal Arbi
{"title":"Arbitrase Dalam Dispute Settlement Understanding Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Proses Banding Atas Sengketa Perdagangan Internasional","authors":"F. Salsabila","doi":"10.55809/tora.v9i3.272","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55809/tora.v9i3.272","url":null,"abstract":"Arbitrase diperkenalkan dalam organisasi World Trade Organization pada Pasal 25 dari Dispute Settlement Understanding, sebagai salah satu jalan penyelesaian sengketa yang bisa ditempuh para pihak. Penelitian ini membahas mengenai bagaimana arbitrase dalam Dispute Settlement Understanding dapat dipergunakan untuk menyelesaikan proses sengketa perdagangan internasional di tahap banding, dan bagaimana implikasi dan tantangan dalam berjalannya arbitrase sebagai alternatif penyelesaian sengketa perdagangan internasional di tahap banding. Metode penelitian yang dipergunakan adalah non doktrinal, dengan mengolah dan menganalisis bahan hukum seperti perjanjian internasional, putusan dari lembaga penyelesaian sengketa internasional dan peraturan perundang-undangan terkait. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Pasal 25 DSU pada dasarnya menekankan adanya objek sengketa dari arbitrase yang ditafsirkan secara luas, yakni sengketa yang dapat didefinisikan oleh para pihak, sehingga forum arbitrase dimungkinkan untuk dipergunakan sebagai mekanisme banding. Secara sosiologis, urgensi adanya arbitrase di tahap banding adalah karena adanya pemblokiran penambahan anggota di AB, yang menyebabkan AB tidak dapat memproses perkara yang masuk dari para pihak. Arbitrase ini memberikan suatu terobosan hukum baru dan perjanjian turunan berupa terbentuknya Multi Party Interim Appeal Arbitration, namun memiliki tantangannya tersendiri, seperti permasalahan validitas dari lembaga arbitrase sendiri dan dimungkinkannya putusan arbitrase ditolak eksekusinya oleh hukum nasional. \u0000Kata Kunci: Arbitrase; Banding; Sengketa Perdagangan Internasional; WTO. \u0000Arbitration is introduced in the World Trade Organization in Article 25 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding, as one of the dispute resolution avenues that parties can pursue. This research discusses how arbitration in the Dispute Settlement Understanding can be used to resolve international trade dispute processes at the appeal stage, and what are the implications and challenges in the operation of arbitration as an alternative to international trade dispute resolution at the appeal stage. The research method used is non-doctrinal, by processing and analyzing legal materials such as international agreements, decisions from international dispute settlement institutions and related laws and regulations. The results of this study show that Article 25 of the DSU basically emphasizes the existence of an object of dispute from arbitration which is interpreted broadly, namely disputes that can be defined by the parties, so that the arbitration forum is possible to be used as an appeal mechanism. Sociologically, the urgency of arbitration at the appeal stage is due to the blocking of additional members in the AB, which causes the AB to be unable to process incoming cases from the parties. This arbitration provides a new legal breakthrough and a derivative agreement in the form of the establishment of Multi Party Interim Appeal Arbi","PeriodicalId":355257,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum to-ra : Hukum Untuk Mengatur dan Melindungi Masyarakat","volume":"27 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138950845","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tindak Pidana Korupsi dan tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang merupakan kejahatan luar biasa yang merugikan keuangan negara dan kesejahteraan rakyat. Bahkan kedua jenis tindak pidana khusus tersebut telah menjadi isu dan sorotan di dunia internasional. Indonesia berdasarkan Corruption Perception Index Tahun 2022, saat ini berada pada nomor 34 dengan peringkat 110 dari 180 negara di dunia. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwaKonsep mengenai perampasan aset sudah banyak diakui dan diterima di dunia internasional, bahkan melibatkan kerjasama internasional untuk mewujudkannya. Dengan diratifikasinya United Nation Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) Tahun 2003 melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2006, sudah seharusnya perampasan aset sebagai salah satu strategi untuk mengembalikan kerugian negara yang terjadi sebagai akibat tindak pidana korupsi dan tindak pidana pencucian uang. Oleh karenanya perlu segera diundangkan undang-undang tentang perampasan aset di Indonesia.
{"title":"Urgensi Penerapan Perampasan Aset Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang","authors":"Lonna Yohanes Lengkong","doi":"10.55809/tora.v9i3.278","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55809/tora.v9i3.278","url":null,"abstract":"Tindak Pidana Korupsi dan tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang merupakan kejahatan luar biasa yang merugikan keuangan negara dan kesejahteraan rakyat. Bahkan kedua jenis tindak pidana khusus tersebut telah menjadi isu dan sorotan di dunia internasional. Indonesia berdasarkan Corruption Perception Index Tahun 2022, saat ini berada pada nomor 34 dengan peringkat 110 dari 180 negara di dunia. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwaKonsep mengenai perampasan aset sudah banyak diakui dan diterima di dunia internasional, bahkan melibatkan kerjasama internasional untuk mewujudkannya. Dengan diratifikasinya United Nation Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) Tahun 2003 melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2006, sudah seharusnya perampasan aset sebagai salah satu strategi untuk mengembalikan kerugian negara yang terjadi sebagai akibat tindak pidana korupsi dan tindak pidana pencucian uang. Oleh karenanya perlu segera diundangkan undang-undang tentang perampasan aset di Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":355257,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum to-ra : Hukum Untuk Mengatur dan Melindungi Masyarakat","volume":"29 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138948828","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hukum Untuk Mengatur, dan Melindungi Masyarakat, Aidhya Diory, Amamie Marpaung, Akhmad Budi Cahyono, Akhmad Budi, Konsekuensi Bagi, Debitor Yang, Tidak Mengajukan, Rencana Perdamaian, Dalam Proses, Penundaan Kewajiban, Pembayaran Utang
A settlement offer in the process of suspension of debt payment obligation is in principle given to convince creditors that the debtor has the desire to settle their debts. When the debtor is in an unstable condition and feels unable to pay his debts, the law provides the debtor with the opportunity for the debt payment obligation to be suspended and provide a settlement offer for their creditors, which is regulated in Article 222 paragraph (2) of the Law No. 37 of 2004. However, in practice, it turns out some debtors do not use this opportunity to provide a settlement offer, in which case the Law No. 37 of 2004 does not explicitly regulate the legal consequences. This is the focus of this research by reviewing and discussing several jurisprudence/judge decisions with different legal considerations to see what the legal consequences are if the Debtor does not submit a settlement offer.
{"title":"KONSEKUENSI BAGI DEBITOR YANG TIDAK MENGAJUKAN RENCANA PERDAMAIAN DALAM PROSES PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG","authors":"Hukum Untuk Mengatur, dan Melindungi Masyarakat, Aidhya Diory, Amamie Marpaung, Akhmad Budi Cahyono, Akhmad Budi, Konsekuensi Bagi, Debitor Yang, Tidak Mengajukan, Rencana Perdamaian, Dalam Proses, Penundaan Kewajiban, Pembayaran Utang","doi":"10.55809/tora.v9i3.277","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55809/tora.v9i3.277","url":null,"abstract":"A settlement offer in the process of suspension of debt payment obligation is in principle given to convince creditors that the debtor has the desire to settle their debts. When the debtor is in an unstable condition and feels unable to pay his debts, the law provides the debtor with the opportunity for the debt payment obligation to be suspended and provide a settlement offer for their creditors, which is regulated in Article 222 paragraph (2) of the Law No. 37 of 2004. However, in practice, it turns out some debtors do not use this opportunity to provide a settlement offer, in which case the Law No. 37 of 2004 does not explicitly regulate the legal consequences. This is the focus of this research by reviewing and discussing several jurisprudence/judge decisions with different legal considerations to see what the legal consequences are if the Debtor does not submit a settlement offer.","PeriodicalId":355257,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum to-ra : Hukum Untuk Mengatur dan Melindungi Masyarakat","volume":"88 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138951437","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：