肯尼亚外科手术设备供应的障碍

R. M. Oosting, L. Wauben, Salome .W. Mwaura, J. Madete, R. Groen, J. Dankelman
{"title":"肯尼亚外科手术设备供应的障碍","authors":"R. M. Oosting, L. Wauben, Salome .W. Mwaura, J. Madete, R. Groen, J. Dankelman","doi":"10.31354/GLOBALCE.V1I2.61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & Objective:The need for surgery is currently not met in Sub-Saharan Africa, requiring both extra workforce and surgical equipment. Currently, there is a gap in the availability of surgical equipment which, among others, limits the provision of safe surgery. To design strategies to increase availability, the use of surgical equipment in this context needs to be understood. This study aims to: 1) identify the different phases surgical equipment goes through during its lifespan (i.e. the surgical equipment journey) in Kenya, and to 2) identify barriers that are perceived by biomedical equipment technicians (BMETs). \n  \nMaterial & Methods:Seven semi-structured in-depth interview sessions were conducted with a total of 17 BMETs working in Kenya. Participants worked in six different hospitals (four public, one private and one mission). Interviews were conducted between December 2016 and December 2018. Participants were asked to describe or draw the surgical equipment journey and describe the perceived barriers during this journey. \nResults:The surgical equipment journey consists of three phases: procurement, usage, and disposal. Stakeholders involved in the surgical equipment journey are users, BMETs, procurement officers, local distributors and in case of donations, donation agencies. Bureaucracy during procurement, difficulties to obtain consumables and spare parts (especially for donated equipment), cleaning with heavy chemicals, and usage in challenging environments were identified as barriers during the surgical equipment journey. \n  \nConclusion:Sustainable interventions at multiple organisational levels are required to optimize the surgical equipment journey in hospitals in Kenya. Different strategies that can be applied in parallel to increase availability of surgical equipment in Kenya were identified by the participants in this study: policies on donations, procurement of durable equipment, more well-trained BMETs and university-trained biomedical engineers, and designs and business models that fit the local use in Kenya and presumably other countries in Sub-Saharan Africa.","PeriodicalId":318587,"journal":{"name":"Global Clinical Engineering Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers to availability of surgical equipment in Kenya\",\"authors\":\"R. M. Oosting, L. Wauben, Salome .W. Mwaura, J. Madete, R. Groen, J. Dankelman\",\"doi\":\"10.31354/GLOBALCE.V1I2.61\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background & Objective:The need for surgery is currently not met in Sub-Saharan Africa, requiring both extra workforce and surgical equipment. Currently, there is a gap in the availability of surgical equipment which, among others, limits the provision of safe surgery. To design strategies to increase availability, the use of surgical equipment in this context needs to be understood. This study aims to: 1) identify the different phases surgical equipment goes through during its lifespan (i.e. the surgical equipment journey) in Kenya, and to 2) identify barriers that are perceived by biomedical equipment technicians (BMETs). \\n  \\nMaterial & Methods:Seven semi-structured in-depth interview sessions were conducted with a total of 17 BMETs working in Kenya. Participants worked in six different hospitals (four public, one private and one mission). Interviews were conducted between December 2016 and December 2018. Participants were asked to describe or draw the surgical equipment journey and describe the perceived barriers during this journey. \\nResults:The surgical equipment journey consists of three phases: procurement, usage, and disposal. Stakeholders involved in the surgical equipment journey are users, BMETs, procurement officers, local distributors and in case of donations, donation agencies. Bureaucracy during procurement, difficulties to obtain consumables and spare parts (especially for donated equipment), cleaning with heavy chemicals, and usage in challenging environments were identified as barriers during the surgical equipment journey. \\n  \\nConclusion:Sustainable interventions at multiple organisational levels are required to optimize the surgical equipment journey in hospitals in Kenya. Different strategies that can be applied in parallel to increase availability of surgical equipment in Kenya were identified by the participants in this study: policies on donations, procurement of durable equipment, more well-trained BMETs and university-trained biomedical engineers, and designs and business models that fit the local use in Kenya and presumably other countries in Sub-Saharan Africa.\",\"PeriodicalId\":318587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Clinical Engineering Journal\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Clinical Engineering Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31354/GLOBALCE.V1I2.61\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Clinical Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31354/GLOBALCE.V1I2.61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景与目的:撒哈拉以南非洲地区目前对外科手术的需求尚未得到满足,这需要额外的劳动力和手术设备。目前,外科手术设备的供应存在差距,这限制了安全手术的提供。为了设计提高可用性的策略,需要了解在这种情况下手术设备的使用。本研究旨在:1)确定肯尼亚手术设备在其使用寿命(即手术设备之旅)中经历的不同阶段,以及2)确定生物医学设备技术人员(BMETs)所感知的障碍。材料与方法:对在肯尼亚工作的17名bmet进行了7次半结构化的深度访谈。参与者在6家不同的医院工作(4家公立医院、1家私立医院和1家特派团医院)。采访于2016年12月至2018年12月进行。参与者被要求描述或绘制手术设备之旅,并描述在此过程中感知到的障碍。结果:手术器械的采购、使用和处置分为三个阶段。参与手术设备旅程的利益相关者包括用户、BMETs、采购官员、当地分销商以及捐赠机构。采购过程中的官僚主义,难以获得耗材和备件(特别是捐赠设备),使用重化学品清洁以及在具有挑战性的环境中使用手术设备被认为是手术设备旅程中的障碍。结论:需要在多个组织层面采取可持续的干预措施,以优化肯尼亚医院的外科设备之旅。本研究的参与者确定了可以同时应用于增加肯尼亚手术设备可用性的不同策略:捐赠政策、耐用设备的采购、训练有素的bmet和大学培训的生物医学工程师,以及适合肯尼亚当地使用的设计和商业模式,可能也适用于撒哈拉以南非洲的其他国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Barriers to availability of surgical equipment in Kenya
Background & Objective:The need for surgery is currently not met in Sub-Saharan Africa, requiring both extra workforce and surgical equipment. Currently, there is a gap in the availability of surgical equipment which, among others, limits the provision of safe surgery. To design strategies to increase availability, the use of surgical equipment in this context needs to be understood. This study aims to: 1) identify the different phases surgical equipment goes through during its lifespan (i.e. the surgical equipment journey) in Kenya, and to 2) identify barriers that are perceived by biomedical equipment technicians (BMETs).   Material & Methods:Seven semi-structured in-depth interview sessions were conducted with a total of 17 BMETs working in Kenya. Participants worked in six different hospitals (four public, one private and one mission). Interviews were conducted between December 2016 and December 2018. Participants were asked to describe or draw the surgical equipment journey and describe the perceived barriers during this journey. Results:The surgical equipment journey consists of three phases: procurement, usage, and disposal. Stakeholders involved in the surgical equipment journey are users, BMETs, procurement officers, local distributors and in case of donations, donation agencies. Bureaucracy during procurement, difficulties to obtain consumables and spare parts (especially for donated equipment), cleaning with heavy chemicals, and usage in challenging environments were identified as barriers during the surgical equipment journey.   Conclusion:Sustainable interventions at multiple organisational levels are required to optimize the surgical equipment journey in hospitals in Kenya. Different strategies that can be applied in parallel to increase availability of surgical equipment in Kenya were identified by the participants in this study: policies on donations, procurement of durable equipment, more well-trained BMETs and university-trained biomedical engineers, and designs and business models that fit the local use in Kenya and presumably other countries in Sub-Saharan Africa.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Healthcare Providers’ Readiness to Address Medical Device Cybersecurity within the Irish Healthcare System Sustainable procurement of medical devices in an international context - Part 3 A Landscape Study to Determine the Innovation Mortality Rate in Health Technology Innovations Across the Globe Sustainable procurement of medical devices in an international context - Part 2 Application of statistical processes control for the performance improvement of a clinical engineering department
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1